Similar Posts

17 Comments

  1. 100% The dictatorship of the housing speculators for capital gain and National.

  2. I would have thought that a threat such as that to an opposition candidate during an election year was an attempt to interfere with the electoral process. Any thoughts?

  3. It is just typical Nat speak, I cannot see this as anything worse than that, they have been doing this all the time, often when they are not recorded by media, though.

    Alfred Ngaro is a narrow minded kind of jerk, I know, he is not the kind of persons I would ever want to be associated with.

    He used to be a pastor of a church too:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Ngaro

    “Ngaro trained as an electrician and was self-employed in the trade for five years.[3] As per his grandmother’s wish,[2] he then completed a theology degree and became a pastor at the Tamaki Community Church.[4]”

    Something else of interest:

    “Controversy

    In 2009, Alfred Ngaro allegedly punched former Tamaki College art teacher Christopher Scott Roy for not bowing his head during a prayer. Roy alleged that Ngaro, whose son was in the Tamaki First XV rugby team, approached Roy after the prayer. Roy alleged that he was then confronted by Ngaro and that he then punched Roy in the back of the head.[15] Tamaki College denied any assault occurred. In a judgment released mid November 2013, ERA member Tania Tetitaha did not make a finding about the alleged assault but found there were several issues with Roy’s statements including: despite initially identifying the principal Soana Pamaka, Roy changed his evidence at the hearing, saying he didn’t see her strike him at all. Roy then changed the location of his injuries and provided no corroborating evidence. The alleged motivation for the assault (Ngaro’s displeasure at Roy’s refusal to bow his head during grace) did not ring true. When Roy took the matter to police, they declined to investigate. The ERA also found a lack of evidence of bullying behaviour. The police and Employment Relations Authority decided not to investigate the incident.[16]”

    He comes across a bit bigoted and overzealous at times, the above may explain it. Now he is in politics, and we see the nasty side of him in his actions there.

    1. Why are people surprised to see ngaros nasty side he is in the nasty party.

  4. I always wondered why National selected Alfred. Clearly he was more useful than just their diversity card for appearances sake.

    Obviously his “debt collector/rent man/bouncer” persona, threatening anyone who disagreed with “The organisation” aka the National Party, was seen as useful too.

    Weird but never would I have thought a Minister of the Crown could be such intimidating extortionate filth, but there you go, National plumb a new depth in the sewer they occupy.

    I suppose their gangster style in your face stand overs are a change from the old model where an agent did the ministers bidding so they could deny all knowledge.

  5. The last person who behaved like that was Aaron “Don’t you know who I am” Gilmour. We know how well that went!

    Be careful Alfred Ngaro, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”

    Remember Alfred, we still think your a nobody.

  6. So just how long has National used the threatening mantra? Have the media had this threat hanging over their heads for many years? How many mainstream media presenters are “in the pocket”?

    Given the Chipmunks interview of Little compared to the interview of English, clearly the Chipmunks been threatened and told to tone down his questions.

  7. National’s hierarchy has forced Ngaro to apologise; http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/330743/ngaro-apologises-for-govt-criticism

    Joyce has stated;

    “It’s not the way the government operates, we work with providers of all types in terms of working relationships and they all have different politics and their politics doesn’t get involved with the way that the government contracts and nor should it.

    Which is rubbish, of course. Ngaro was made to apologise not for what he said, but that he publicly voiced National’s covert policy to hit back at criticisms.

    In National’s eyes, that was Ngaro’s mis-step, not that he actually said it.

    1. Oh to have been a fly on the wall during that conversation between Joyce and Ngaro. I suspect, given that it’s an election year, there was some salty language involved. It’s Joyce’s job to go around with the air freshener, banishing the stench wafting up from the putrid carcass he hilariously terms a successful government, and Ngaro, overcome by a toxic surplus of bile and testosterone, has gone and thrown a sackful of spanners into the works. Joyce must be inwardly seething.

      Nice job, Alfred. I suspect Andrew Little is grinning from ear to ear.

    2. Where is Alfred Ngaro’s apology to Willie Jackson, Alan Johnson and John Campbell, by the way, for the tone of the language he used? Should he not apologise to them and the public, rather than to his own party???

Comments are closed.