Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

16 Comments

  1. Yes ..well …if your getting outplayed by that goofy dreamer clown Seymour, whose only there by dint of Epsom rigging the electoral system combined with a bunch of nothing better to do with their money billionaires, and, the old, and not to be ageist, but let’s face it, he’s past any cohesive rational thinking, Peters, then Luxon would have to be rated as N.Z’s worst Prime Minister ever !!..

    That’s no small achievement when you consider the likes of the dreadful Shipley and the shifty conman Key.

    I know people who are dna Nat.voters, and when i ask them what they think of Luxon there is just a shaking of the head and a barely audible..’ oh well..we’ll see’.

    That’s the highest level of enthusiasm they can muster..

    When i suggest to them that the left hand doesn’t seem to know what right hand is doing , there is just silence…

    The whole coalition of clowns are so stupid, so disorganised, so devoid of any meaningful ideas, i can’t see them getting past the two year mark without the whole thing imploding.

    Luxon has zero cultural capital, poor knowledge, and no idea how to preside over a country that is beset with many complex issues.

    He’s a piece of white bread heading for a toaster on maximum setting!

    1. He’s a piece of white bread heading for a toaster on maximum setting!

      Classic! True @Grant

    2. I wouldn’t underestimate Winston even now. He is as cunning as a shithouse rat. He’s been written off many, many times, and like Jesus Christ or a zombie, he always seems to come back.

  2. I didn’t see the conference, did they mention the starvation and disease and 30,000 dead people or were they more interested in shipping containers?

    1. Only shipping containers and the negative affect it will have on our trade. Total denial as to any link to Israel and Gaza.
      I got the impression Luxon couldn’t be trusted to announce it alone so had to be chaperoned, then the minders made it worse by trying to flannel the fact we are sending troops to a very complex conflict.

    2. Did they mention the millions of Yeminesse chanting Bring on World War 3? No one ever thinks oh shit things are about to go bad until building start blowing up all around.

  3. Luxon took on a disjointed political party and in 2 years pulled it together and then won an election and drew in 2 opposition parties to form a government. Well done I say
    Whereas Hipkins took on a party that had won by a large majority but could not control his team who broke laws broke promises and lost the election .
    Which person do you want leading at the time of a crisis

    1. It’s only well done if he does a good job. That seems vanishingly unlikely. Best thing for NZ would be if he resigned – he hasn’t got a clue how to rebuild an economy savaged by far Right bullshit and hollowed out by immigration and real estate inflation.

    2. He didn’t draw in two opposition parties.
      He was FORCED to have them because his own message is flaky, vague, lacks depth in understanding of NZ, carries unpleasant baggage from their previous time in govt. and is generally not enthusiastically welcomed by the electorate.
      He personally is inadequate and about as inspiring as a wet weekend.
      If he was as wonderful as you say, he wouldn’t have needed them Trevor. Why don’t you face facts?

    3. Labour self-destructed so Luxon winning the highest vote in the election was not as impressive as you claim. National could have run a stuffed pig & it would still have won. While Jacinda got a lot of bad press (some of it deserved) when she got a majority (the first in a very long time) she made a point of saying that she wanted to govern for all New Zealanders while the current coalition has shown that they only care for those at the top & still believe in the widely discredited trickle down theory.

Comments are closed.