Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. Using meritocracy would establish a better standard for promotion. But what kind of background and what achievement in what area would the various political parties look for. At present – identity, appearance, fluency in speech and thought, suitability of appeal to a particular community. Nothing there though about commitment and success to core needs of the community in both a practical and kind fashion. These two seem to be intertwined in getting good results for the people most requiring their attention.

    Perhaps we need more disabled people like Theodore Roosevelt polio-recovered, blind persons like Helen Keller, etc. Outstanding and wide in their abilities and determination to overcome problems for themselves and wishing good for others as well. I think our politicians and their familiars, (sorry for rudeness to those who don’t deserve it) need to have had harder lives with help to rise, and then return the favour.

    Was Teddy Roosevelt the president in a wheelchair?
    He was diagnosed with poliomyelitis and underwent years of therapy,…Roosevelt remained paralyzed from the waist down and relied on a wheelchair and leg braces for mobility, which he took efforts to conceal in public.
    Paralytic illness of Franklin D. Roosevelt – Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Paralytic_illness_of_Fra…

    Seven fascinating facts you probably didn’t know about Helen Keller
    She was the first person with deafblindness to earn a college degree. …
    She was great friends with Mark Twain. …
    She worked the vaudeville circuit. …
    She was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 1953. …
    She was extremely political. …
    She fell in love and almost eloped.
    More items…
    perkins.org https://www.perkins.org › seven-fascinating

  2. Don’t you find it ironic that you’ve been calling for a revolution for decades but then when there actually is one, you find you’re the target, white man?

    LOL

  3. I challenge you to name one better Minister of MSD since 1975.

    A real increase in benefits, and the change from the miserly CPI increase each year on top of that (why that was not one of the recommendations is beyond me – because there was a real decrease in benefit value each year via the CPI assessment).

    And the significant increase in outside earnings before abatement to $160.

    Weak field, but perspective.

Comments are closed.