Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

13 Comments

  1. For the Democrats to win back men, they have to genuinely want them back. But they don’t, they just want their votes. Just like they don’t like black people, but need their votes.
    The pretense is obvious.

  2. Here’s the problem as I see it, and I think others do as well.
    What you call the “left” are so far right, in terms of economic policy, that they have to compensate with bullshit social policy in an attempt to “be kind”.
    Until the left change their economic policy to favour work over capital, which removes the need for all their bullshit social policy, voters will see them as a slightly less repulsive, but more insidious, form of the extreme far right we have in power now.
    What is kinder? To boil the frog slowly in oil, or to put a bullet through its tiny head.

  3. I’d like posts to start off with Kiwi stuff and then show how USA stuff affects us too not the other way round. The whole of politics has become a mega drama performance to hat titillates (suitable word eh) the punters, us as the passive audience. What we want is to make sure of audience participation in this country,not be looking at the USA all the time. We don’t want to be watching them as the country burns behind us. If we hre want to attract men back to the Left we need to be clever, Tamaki has succeeded in rallying men in one way, but we don’t want the brownshirt reaction – the Left should do better and then demand to take over Labour. Rationale – the present incumbents are losers, out of touch with the voters, and out of touch with their own humanity. They are caught up in the theatrical strutting and peacock side of politics minor stars under the guidance of a clever, calculating entrepreneur plus.

  4. How did the modern conception of masculinity become so constrained and narrow that some men are threatened by women with assertiveness, well-argued opinions and a determination to maintain the sort of financial and physical independence that men take for granted?
    What the hell happened? Where did the idea of Renaissance Man disappear to? The archetypal Renaissance Man being Sir Philip Sidney – the international diplomat, acclaimed poet and soldier who died at the battle of Zutphen aged 32 – reputedly from an infected leg wound after he removed his own thigh armour because his men had not been issued with any for the battle.
    What happened to the man who has a larg, inclusive spirit, who can do many things, who (as Whitman said) “contains multitudes”?

    Now he just sits and whines about something called ‘wokeness’ – a garbage concept invented by a malevolent right-wing propaganda machine. It’s not’ wokeness’ that’s the problem, it’s how contemporary capitalism, the tyranny of money and predatory rent-seeking limits the possibility of young men being anything more than a shadow of what they could be.

    1. Hear, hear my good man! Thanks I think we all need those apposite and interesting facts and thoughts. (This is not a bit, bot or a butt.)

Comments are closed.