Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. Martyn, you need to factor in that not only would a legalised cannabis market raise $1.5bn a year in revenue, the counterfactual is that $3.5bn currently spent on enforcing illegal weed would be available for redistribution elsewhere.

  2. Their policy on income tax and the G.S.T. is to the right of Tony Abbott and John Howard! Even if they did modify the brackets and somehow raise a large amount of cash, what would they actually spend it on?

    I don’t think anyone believes that the Greens would suddenly announce a plan to build high-speed rail to every town/suburb, reopen the factories to churn out electric automobiles and robotics, expand the decrepit highway network, or reopen the 68 mothballed tramway routes in nine cities.

    The money would probably just be wasted.

    Like the other parties, they demand everybody lower their political horizons into the dirt. The dizzying heights of the world-beating 1950s economy shall never again be reached — because people like the Greens are quite happy to rule over a nation reduced to being a backward, low-wage agrarian satrapy of Wall Street.

  3. Well it’s not just focusing taxes on untaxed capital gains per say it also has to clear the landscape for more industrious entrepreneurs.

    The way to handle that was to claim real-estate early on. Patents is a way of dealing with that. Open source mentalities in development. A lot of developers not just in property don’t understand intellectual property in my opinion. There’s this huge stick that isn’t empathetic to collaboration when the reality is developers can’t inforce only fans or more liquor stores etc without controlling IP.

    So if the government has control over IP and patents through out government science departments as an example then spending that increase tax revenue would have a far greater fighting chance of staying in the game as regulators take out over developed capital as regulators try and find room for more walk ins.

    Without a spending mechanism it is literally your litigation dollars vs traditional finance aka the big four banks and how’s that been going? Lolz.

  4. Simon Wilson’s best work has been on the working group. When his views have been debated. Not a big fan of his opinion piece.

    We all have to love soccer for the next few months to support the World Cup.

  5. Hit the nail on the head. No-one takes them seriously because they have become a caricature of who they used to be.

    Also I get this overwhelming sense of ennui just now.

    I notice people are no longer signing petitions or putting in submissions in big numbers despite some really meaty issues around just now – censorship, new RMA, Local Govt and Electoral Reform. I get the impression the entire electorate is absolutely exhausted by the never ending barrage of political shit day in and day out in NZ combined with the very real struggle to just survive on an existential level.

  6. No one takes the Greens seriously because they are science deniers with their gender ideology bullshit and the failure of the minister of violence and sexual violence prevention to condemn the violence at Albert Park. They have no credibility

  7. Simon Wilson. That guy whose anti Wayne Brown articles actually helped Wayne win the mayoralty. Jilted Simon, that annoying voice in the wilderness who only writes I hate Wayne Brown articles in the Herald, to get back at him. Car hating freedom of movement opponent Simon, the man who wants us riding bicycles inside our medieval 15 minute villages but no further. Someone has to like him. I know Wayne doesn’t. Nor 99.9% of Herald commenters. But thanks to Wayne, Simon, somehow and I don’t know how, gets paid.

    1. XRAY: “Car hating freedom of movement opponent Simon, the man who wants us riding bicycles inside our medieval 15 minute villages but no further.”

      We’ve got people like that here in Wellington, some of them Councillors.

      I’m informed by another local Councillor that those who shout loudest against car use, and tell the rest of us to use (non-existent or unreliable) public transport or bikes, or to walk, are the same ones who drive their cars to Council meetings. Hypocrisy rules, ok…

  8. We read with raucous scepticism the Green proposals for a wealth tax.

    What they’re proposing bears very strong resemblances to what the Communists did to the Russian bourgeoisie and aristocrats, following the Revolution.

    But they don’t want to be compared to the evil Commies, do they!

Comments are closed.