Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

20 Comments

  1. Every party looks hard right after 6 years of hard left government with the hard core Marxism of the Greens in the wings. The Overton Window in NZ Politics has skewed towards the left side by some margin.

    1. What a joke that Labour were hard left in any of their 6 years.

      I only wish. I want all people to have a fair go and they currently don’t.

      We like unemployment.

    2. Are you able to give an example of how far left New Zealand has skewed, on taxes maybe. Foreign affairs. Childwelfare. Whatever. Just one example?

  2. Right-wing politics is a range of political ideologies that view certain social orders and hierarchies as inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically supporting this position based on natural law, economics, authority, property or tradition. Hierarchy and inequality may be seen as natural results of traditional social differences or competition in market economies.
    In addition right wing thinking involves rugged individualism and assumptions about the market being the primary solver of problems in a society – conversely, government involvement in the economy needs to be minimalised (or eliminated if possible) to allow for market forces to function unfettered.

  3. There’s just “something” up with “our” new government post election. I really feel the whole coalition will not materialise. Certainly, David Seymours ridiculous policies will not materialise. Dunno why but it all feels really off. Yet, if I’m wrong, we’re all here to correct him/her/they.

  4. Seymour said on the award winning AM show, Willy is an old radio Shock Jock and he is probably right.

  5. If Jackson wants to organise marches he is free to do so. Just like the current govt is free to hold a referendum on the Treaty.

    Politicians made changes ro the treaty in the 70’s and 80’s without consulting us. What could be fairer than holding a referendum?

    1. No such thing as a fair referendum in this country. The only way it could possibly be fair would be for the political parties to nominate one person to put forward the view of that party, do not allow advertising paid for by anyone other than the state, each party funded equally by the state.
      Referendums as well as elections can be bought by the big end of as we have just seen.
      The wording of the question would need to be approved by all parties not just those in Government.
      Unfortunately I cannot see that happening as already Seymour and Luxon don’t agree on even having a referendum.

  6. Perhaps we can have a referendum on “Anyone with dishonest and manipulative character flaws shall be forbidden from entering politics.”

  7. Civil unrest is exactly what the billionaire-class power bloc that truly runs the world, and of which both Labour and National are subservient to, longs for. The more unrest, the easier it s to push their policies through (via their political minions). Ordinary folk fighting ordinary folk – yet another ruling class wet dream comes to fruition.

  8. Would Winston Peters, who is a lawyer and believes in the “sanctity of contract”, agree to an alteration of the terms of the Treaty by the Crown acting without the consent of Maori?
    Would Christopher Luxon, who holds himself out as a pragmatist, be prepared to unilaterally annul the Treaty of Waitangi and propel Maori back to the Whakaminenga of 1835?
    I doubt it.
    However in the unlikely event that the colonialist parliament votes to enact ACT’s proposed bill, Maori will be obliged to detach from the colonial regime and that will be no bad thing.

Comments are closed.