Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

29 Comments

  1. TVNZ is bad enough. If RNZ is to stoop to that level, we have nothing left. it’s serious.

    1. Which is why I’ve always maintained it should be more of a takeover by RNZ than a merger.
      I’m all for a merger, but it still doesn’t fix the problem of NZ having one of the most over-managed, over complicated public broadcasting systems in the world.
      We’ve gone from one extreme (during the days of the NZBC) to the other where assets belonging to the commons have been stolen (e.g. broadcasting house Wellington) or commercialised.
      Merger fine – it’s probably the best we can hope for as a first step

  2. Given such a strong right wing media bias in this country will this merger offer balance or would it be, as it should be, neutral .
    As it is Newstalk ZB and TV 3 are right wing corrupt and we need balance.

    1. lol at the Stockholm Syndrome responses to this. The MSM are bought because they told me they were. WTF is MSM anyway? Is it where the junk dealer lives?

  3. There must be a lot of people who don’t watch or listen to the local broadcasters at all any more.

    I recall the A.B.C. reporting that, prior to Warner Bros. announcing their offer for the old TV-Works stations, that the country was at serious risk of having no commercial news bulletins on T.V. whatsoever.

    Imagine a parallel universe where the country had demanded to remain a British dependency, and the B.B.C. has set up shop instead of the (now splintered) N.Z.B.C.

    The entire network would still be commercial free, and the licence fee would still pay for it.

    Every province would still have its own local B.B.C. radio station, as well as the national stations.

    B.B.C. Radio One would be the dominant F.M. Top 40 station, and the dominant station for sports would be B.B.C. Five Live.

    Large amounts of televised sports would be on B.B.C. One. Presumably there would be a local version of B.B.C. News 24.

    After all, every one of those things is still the case in the U.K. right now. The A.B.C. still provides virtually all those things, even without the licence fee (or commercials).

    No wonder they are afraid of a unified N.Z.B.C. coming back to life. People might actually demand the same service.

  4. 60% support the merger and 40% oppose it.

    Including the ‘don’t knows’ the results were:

    44% support
    29% don’t support
    26% don’t know

    Either these numbers do not compute,
    Or I’m a wee bit more stupid than I think I am…

    1. The post says: “of those with an opinion, 60% support the merger and 40% oppose it.”

      So, the don’t knows are excluded, leaving the 60% being a recalculation of the numbers of those who support compared with those who don’t support the merger.

  5. We want a public broadcasting system. A TV channel with no ads, or interruptions during a programme. Also we don’t want it called by another set of letters. What is the matter with National Radio, and National TV.
    Why Advertisers want space on TV, I cannot understand. Who watches them? We certainly don’t.

    Another comment. Please please can someone influence the amount of background music. I need a TV where I can turn the music off. I find it irritating and I cannot hear the story or the speakers. Can programme makers manage to think what is important – a conversation or music.

  6. RNZ won’t raise standards of journalism in TVNZ. In the longer term the reverse will happen as history suggests standards will always be dragged down. If you want excellence you need to start afresh.
    Besides, neoliberal NZ worships the lowest common denominator. It’s content is easiest to produce and it’s from where money can be most easily extracted.

  7. John Campbell’s recent journalism has been as a TVNZ chief correspondent. What exactly is RNZ producing since it was placed under neo-liberal management and asked to focus on the Auckland market?

Comments are closed.