Media Statement: ‘Governmentt Ferry decision a bad day for New Zealand’
-
$900m purchase of 2 smaller non-rail ferries
-
$551m cancelled iRex contract for two ferries
-
$469m sunk costs (other than ferry construction contract) for iReX project
-
$500m portside facilities for new ferries
-
$300m land purchase, construction for new ‘road-bridging’ facilities
-
$200m replication of Kiwirail engineering facilities in South Island
-
$17m annual ongoing costs of double handling of interisland freight at rail ferry terminals
-
$1B reduction in value of KiwiRail’s Balance Sheet.
-
$1Bpa Economic cost of slower, more expensive freight, greater roading damage, reduced road safety
-
$900m purchase of 2 smaller non-rail ferries;
-
$551m iReX ferries contract cancellation costs
-
possibly $300m, based on likely tagged contingency;
-
$469m sunk costs (other than ferry construction contract) for iRex project
-
design, Picton / Wellington portside work, consents, etc – This includes the 2024 KiwiRail asset impairment charge on its Balance Sheet of $228 Million for Interisland under construction assets written off
-
$500m portside facilities for new ferries
-
upgrades, earthquake strengthening, terminals for new ferries, etc. at Picton & Wellington
-
$300m land purchase, construction for new ‘road-bridging’ facilities
-
including purchase of additional intermodal equipment for transfer of freight on and off rail at each end of the Strait
-
$200m replication of Kiwirail engineering facilities
-
now needed in South Island due to lack of rail connection with existing network, eg Woburn rail (Lower Hutt) track weld facility, upgrading locomotive overhaul facilities, likely duplication of maintenance equipment for separate networks that can no longer be practically or economically moved across Cook Strait
-
$800m Economic cost of slower, more expensive freight, greater roading damage, reduced road safety
-
$17m annual ongoing costs of double handling of interisland freight at rail ferry terminals
-
$1B reduction in value of KiwiRail’s Balance Sheet
-
plus possible material impairment to the current carrying value of rolling stock, rail infrastructure, plant, equipment and other assets on KiwiRail’s Balance Sheet. This is needed to ensure Balance Sheet carrying valuations reflect fair value due to a likely loss of freight traffic as a result of this decision which will likely require a material valuation downwards in Cash Generating Units (CGU) valuations. Indeed, on a CGU basis many assets on KiwiRail‘s Balance current sheet may be worthless post this decision.
-
LIkely loss of up to 25% of KiwiRail freight due to exit from Domestic Freight if Kiwirails exits market
-
Additional costs to the Wellington region as it has to carry more burden of the rail network since here may be little or no freight to share its infrastructure costs
While it is true there are likely to be some direct benefits to the Road transport industry (gross economic benefits from displacement of rail to road transport) not reflected above, the nett effects of road benefits when the disbenefits of abandoning rail are taken into account, will mean there will be significant economic and wellbeing loss to the nation a identified the Benefit of Rail to New Zealand ARA report in August 2024







And then there is this, corruption of the highest order…
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/536285/fast-track-projects-speaker-rules-no-private-benefit-in-list
We haven’t got them yet nathan they might have hairs on them like the ten bridges up north, the Hutt Valley link minus Melling station, the twin Mt Victoria tunnels and the Grenada to Petone link.