Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. …”there are tens of thousands like him…”. No there is not tens if thousands of homicidal maniacs out there or we would put Russia and Ukraine in the shade.

    What we have is emotionally stunted self indulgent arseholes who think with the fists and make consistently bad decisions who should be locked away until it dawns in them, its a bad idea to be like that!

    1. Signalling your desire to lock assholes away is cope. It isn’t a very good role model.

    2. Matu failed in his duty to protect and provide for his woman and his family which is precisely where people like X-ray need men to be weak and degenerate so that there is less compitition.

  2. Most interesting thoughts Martyn. I can recognise much of what you say and agree that we are at a bad crux in time.

  3. There is widespread and very dangerous demonisation of males occurring in the U.S. Alliance countries, which is heavily promoted by Wall Street and the political establishment.

    This outcome is the result of a strategy by the Third Way Liberal establishment to control dissent, namely the use of particularist demagogy from the Critical Social Justice school of Poststructuralism.

    It has resulted in most male Europeans (those without sexual abnormalities) being denounced as the cause of all social problems — a public menace that must be silenced, suppressed, re-educated, and “deconstructed”. (But most revealingly, it is mainly the workingmen who are attacked; and the only workers who are lauded are the non-union imported labourers, cheaply supplied by the people traffickers!)

    These anti-scientific theories claim that social problems do not emanate from actual conditions of wealth and political power, but rather from the morphological traits of individual men — specifically caused by a master stratum that supposedly controls society, somehow consisting of all non-sodomite European males (including the poor). This bizarre, anti-intellectual propaganda deliberately buries any useful class analysis.

    1. Cheap imported labour, are so much more interesting than the lads here…. Men in NZ should not have any opportunity to become fully realized deep human beings, under woke -no, just confused little plebeians, constantly navel gazing and staring at their balls in the mirror wondering what they are for.

    2. “…particularist demagogy from the Critical Social Justice school of Poststructuralism.” I don’t know what reactionary bullshit you’re reading but none of this has anything to do with the critical Neo-Marxist inspired philosophy of poststructuralism. I suspect you have become imbued with the whole sub-genre of trashy books portending to be intelligent enough to criticise poststructuralism in a meaningful way. Most of this stuff seems to be inspired by the likes of Ayn Rand or Friedrich Hayek and misses the point entirely.

  4. Well said Martyn!- you’re at least halfway there in your thinking:

    Several aspects of supposedly progressive policy changes over the decades have destroyed the future of this young man and thousands of others. Let me try to list them:

    1. The structure of welfare promotes solo motherhood and absentee fathers. Boys need good male role models. They need male protection in rough areas to prevent intimidation by street gangs. They don’t need their mothers’ live-in boyfriends to bash them. The most vulnerable in society fall into this welfare trap. Here it’s Maori and Islanders. In the US it’s blacks. In the UK it’s across the board.

    2. Schools have few if any male teachers. Teaching today is largely a second income job for women.

    3. The school curriculum has been restructured to favour girls. The craft work that boys thrive on is largely gone. Craft work that would previously have gotten them into an apprenticeship. Continuous assessment instead of high stakes exams favours girls over boys because they’re more social mature adept in their teens. The syllabus has been castrated by removing all the fun stuff boys like, such as ballistics, vectors and trigonometry with military applications. (My school maths and physics were full off cannon firings and torpedoes shooting whilst my chemistry class mostly consisted of making things go bang)

    4. Every time the TV is turned on there is a woman in an ad belittling a man. This is because the marketing people know the women often makes the purchasing choice and females are more susceptible to this type of propaganda. If it was the other way around there would be hell to pay, but we just shrug and take it.

    5. Feminism has a lot to answer for. I was a feminist when it meant equality of the sexes, but it’s metastasized to become pure misandry.

  5. “boyfriends should not control their girlfriends”

    Girlfriends should not control their boyfriends. Lost count over the years since invention of smart phone the endless texts guys get from their partner who under some trivial pretext (no pun intended) are just keeping them under surveillance – I need x done, where are you now?

  6. I agree about this idea of male toxicity is rampant is untrue and unhelpful.

    It’s part of the woke culture that some of us on here rail against.

    This young man had already assaulted someone when he brutally assaulted a women. He obviously had previously history because he was in a programme to help young men turn their lives around. His history included family violence and deprivation. This guy imo was a walking time bomb.

    We know from the Dunedin study a combination of genes and childhood history of abuse is the combo that creates somebody who is capable of this.
    No surprises there.

    The Dunedin study also showed that the more self control from three years old a child has, the better outcomes including criminal behaviour and addiction. I have no idea why we are not making more use of this excellent knowledge.

    So really this isn’t about how men are on a continuum. Most men are ok, more than ok.

Comments are closed.