Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

16 Comments

  1. Parliament didn’t sign a treaty and TPM do not represent iwi. This isn’t a Crown/iwi partnership. This is the law making organ of state disciplining three misguided members. The treaty analysis is misconceived. TPM should stop its yawn inducing grandstanding.

  2. MB – I agree with your comment – “Civil conduct inside our Parliament is crucial and sacrosanct when it comes to the holy law that commands Parliament, and with your comment about the Privileges Committee, but I see real hypocrisy by the current Government/Speaker for referring Te Pati Maori to the Privileges Committee for the wonderful haka they did in the House, a haka that showed they were prepared to stand up for themselves and all Maori against the divisive and racist Te Tiriti Principles Bill which Seymour and his party are trying to push through, but essentially ignore the racist vile comments by Winston Peters and Shane Jones directed at Ricardo Menendez March, especially Jones’s comment – “send the Mexican home.”

    Ironically, Judith Collins is reported to have said in response to an apparent Te Pati Maori comment about the Privileges Committee being a “silly little committee” – “It’s never wise to denigrate Parliament and the members of Parliament who try their very best, turn up pretty much every day to do their very best and to represent their constituents and the people of New Zealand. I just don’t think it’s best to do that. I always think it’s wise to show respect to each other in this Parliament, not to be disrespectful.”
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/top/556984/te-pati-maori-to-hold-own-hearing-after-boycotting-privileges-committee

    Peters and Jones were not standing up for themselves when they made their comments directed at Menendez March but Te Pati Maori were when they did their haka. Peters and Jones have not been referred to the Privileges Committee. Te Pati Maori were not disrespecting Parliament when they did their haka but they have been referred to the Privileges Committee.

    Privileges Committed for Te Pati Maori but not for Peters and Jones? Just another example of the colonial system doing everything it can to stomp on Maori.

  3. The Principles of the Treaty of Waitangi Bill was never going to pass.

    Whereas, its long-standing companion, the Regulatory Standards Bill, will.

    Will there be another Haka in response?

  4. Even if you think that the neoliberal trash who make up the majority of MPs deserve decorum and civility- a very questionable idea- friend of Tim Jago types like David Seymour most certainly do not.

  5. I would think many voters would have put of Labour if they thought they would go into coalition with this current Maori Party but interested to see if I am right.

      1. I am signing off for a few weeks while I take advantage of our hospital service .You will have to put all your effort into battling Bob the first.
        Happy posting to all .Friends and Foes

        1. Good luck, our hospital system is a pale of it once was thanks to right wing governments.

  6. Just another example of Maori ignoring rules and laws that ‘inconvenience’ them just like increasingly not paying for food at the supermarket.

    1. Like Gerry Brownlee following the rules when barging through an airport that inconvenienced him. Just another example of pakeha privilege.