Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. All I can say now, just looking at this post, before I have to rush out to do things: GOOD JOB, THANKS FOR YOUR DEDICATION AND COURAGE AND HARD WORK, ALL AT AAAP!!!

    I wish more people would wake up and take a damned clear and firm stand against all this appalling stuff that goes on in our country these days. Manpower need to be shamed into bankruptcy, they have no place in our employment referral industry with the kinds of methods they have been using, shame on them.

    Again, thanks Kate and others, we need more action like this.

  2. Yes agree with writer under employment is the issue and so is availability of cheap labour and using a different process to measure unemployment as those working a few hours or in a casual position or in training are probably being counted as working to push down the rate but really they are part of the bigger group in our country that are actually under employed

  3. The lies of those in government are beyond belief, and we see now that in the US anger is boiling also, leading to the totally unexpected election result that will change things, not necessarily for the better, but that will shake things up.

    NZ government is lying to the public and beneficiaries, and they are pushing people into work, who are often not fit and healthy enough to work, but this proves the lies they use to do this:

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2016/08/16/senior-scientist-and-legal-experts-discredit-evidence-used-by-msd-and-dr-bratt-when-claiming-the-health-benefits-of-work/

    https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/read-the-journal/all-issues/2010-2019/2015/vol-128-no-1425-20-november-2015/6729
    “Is the statement that if a person is off work for 70 days the chance of ever getting back to work is 35% justified?”

    ‚In the expectation of recovery’, Faulkner, Centre for Welfare Reform, Scrib
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/308613502/In-the-Expectation-of-Recovery
    (criticism of biopsychosocial model, Aylward et al)

    More on the obfuscation and lies by MSD and the government:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2015/11/27/msds-selective-and-poor-responses-to-new-oia-requests-on-benefits-advisors-reports-mental-health-and-sole-parent-employment-services/

    New, current PDF version (as on 19.09.16):
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/msds-selective-poor-responses-to-new-o-i-a-requests-post-nzsjb-upd-27-11-15.pdf

    Also study this, if you care:
    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/msd-dr-bratt-present-misleading-evidence-on-worklessness-and-health-publ-post-19-09-16.pdf
    (new current PDF with post, 19.09.16)

    And this is factual stuff too, some do not get it:
    http://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2013/12/28/designated-doctors-used-by-work-and-income-some-also-used-by-acc-the-truth-about-them/

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/designated-doctors-used-by-winz-msd-the-truth-about-them-post-upd-18-10-2016.pdf

  4. WINZ have an agenda of diminishing unemployment and Manpower is one of the pawns they use to acheive it. WINZ are probably functioning legally but this action is morally questionable. How is putting people in a more precarious position, helping them? It makes me wonder how much of this governance people can absorb, before they break.

  5. “This is the story of someone seeking work and sent by Work and Income to Manpower. The hero of the story was and still is “Tony” who came to AAAP with his complaints and concerns. That takes courage. The villain of the piece is not who you might suspect, it is not Manpower. They are just parasitic middlemen pimping poverty. The real villain is Work and Income.”

    Yes, ABSOLUTELY, it is WINZ and MSD that are the true CRIMINALS, who are also responsible for the Social Security Legislation Rewrite Bill before Parliament, wanting rights to redirect benefit money to landlords, as they see fit, without even consulting beneficiaries:
    https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/bills-and-laws/bills-proposed-laws/document/00DBHOH_BILL68669_1/social-security-legislation-rewrite-bill

    Read the critical submissions on the Bill:
    https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/bills-and-laws/bills-proposed-laws/document/00DBHOH_BILL68669_1/tab/submissionsandadvice

    https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/reports/document/51DBSCH_SCR69947_1/social-security-legislation-rewrite-bill-122-2-and-report

    There is other hideous legislation that gets proposed and passed, and sadly our shit media never report on it, as it affects “only” a disliked minority, who most have a dim view of, given media bias and negative reporting.

    So we have this legislation due for the third reading soon, and nobody out there really knows anything about it.

    It will “enshrine” the so called unproved “investment approach”, force more rules and expectations on beneficiaries, and bring in ever more draconian, unjust law and rules that should not be allowed.

    With the SHIT MEDIA we have in New Zealand, being a beneficiary is like being a criminal, given their biased and poor reporting, and most should rather hang themselves than depend on the ever so honoured tax payer, it seems.

    I call them for what they are, these mercenary “reporters”, largely in the government’s pocket, but even Labour betray us, with their indifference towards people on welfare support. They only offer a slightly less draconian approach, and that is BS to me, so I will never vote for Labour anyway.

Comments are closed.