Similar Posts

14 Comments

  1. Well as far as neo liberalism is concerned you can thank our main parties for consistently supporting it over the years and the MSM for incessantly promoting it.

    The outcome on euthanasia was a good one as far as I’m concerned. Whether this so called govt does anything positive with it remains to be seen. To date their track record has been a long long way from being exemplary.

  2. Ironically a dear friend just lost an adult child to a very rare and aggressive cancer today. He died peacefully and quietly at his home this morning, surrounded by a lot of love and support from family, receiving excellent Hospice palliative care to alleviate his pain.

    I have mentioned this before, but I cannot support euthanizing a person, when this caring service is readily available to assist not only the patient, but also the family as well.

  3. This is only the start. In the news last week.

    The Dutch have had euthanasia for 19 years and every year the numbers of mentally ill people who are euthanased goes up. This is really frightening, I don’t get how you can be mentally ill and of sound mind to make the decision!

    Martyn as you say you can knock someone off but you can’t smoke weed, how ludicrous is that.

    We have got this from the ‘compassionate caring’ party Act whose proposals for those on benefits and low wages would make anyone tremble.

    The Dutch government has approved plans to allow euthanasia for terminally ill children aged between one and 12.

    On Tuesday, Health Minister Hugo de Jonge said the rule change would prevent some children from “suffering hopelessly and unbearably”.

    Euthanasia is currently legal in the Netherlands for children older than 12, with mandatory consent from the patient and their parents.

    It is also legal for babies up to a year old with parental consent.

    Doctors in the Netherlands can no longer be prosecuted for carrying out euthanasia on dementia patients who have previously given written consent.

    Previously, patients would need to confirm their request.

    But on Tuesday the Dutch Supreme Court ruled this was no longer the case.

    The decision comes after a doctor was taken to court for carrying out assisted suicide on a patient with Alzheimer’s, who had previously asked for the procedure in a statement.

    Prosecutors said the doctor did not properly consult the unnamed 74-year-old. But the family supported the doctor’s decision, and she was acquitted of any wrongdoing last year.

    1. BBC Netherlands backs euthanasia for terminally ill children under-12
      14th Oct 2020: The Dutch government has approved plans to allow euthanasia for terminally ill children aged between one and 12.

      On Tuesday, Health Minister Hugo de Jonge said the rule change would prevent some children from “suffering hopelessly and unbearably”.

      Euthanasia is currently legal in the Netherlands for children older than 12, with mandatory consent from the patient and their parents. It is also legal for babies up to a year old with parental consent.

      But there is no provision for those aged between one and 12 who are terminally ill.

      “The current laws would not need to be changed, the health minister said, but doctors would be exempt from prosecution for carrying out an approved euthanasia on someone in this age range.”

      Belgium brought in child euthanasia in 2014: Belgium parliament votes through child euthanasia

      “It may be requested by terminally ill children who are in great pain and also have parental consent.
      Opponents argue children cannot make such a difficult decision.”

      Belgium legalised euthanasia for adults 12 years earlier, in 2002.

    2. Euthanasia, Dutch court expands law on dementia cases BBC 21st April 2020

      The decision stems from a court case involving a 64-year-old doctor who carried out the assisted suicide in 2016.

      After being diagnosed with Alzheimer’s four years before she died, the unnamed patient wrote a statement saying that she wanted to be euthanised before entering a care home, but adding that she wanted to decide “while still in my senses and when I think the time is right”.

      Before she was taken into care, a doctor decided that assisted suicide should be administered based on her prior statement. This was confirmed by two separate doctors independently.

      When the day came to end the woman’s life, a sedative was put in her coffee and she lost consciousness.

      But the woman then woke up and had to be held down by her daughter and husband while the process was finished. Full article at the link.

    3. Michal I totally agree. When Seymour was yabbering away about how we now have “a new, kinder New Zealand”, in his weird creepy voice, it looked and sounded like the opening scene for a horror movie. (Stephen King eat your heart out.)

      Yes, this is just the beginning. The “Halloween” season has taken on new meaning. I am desperately sad that Aotearoa has ended up in this place.

  4. This bill was designed by the bean counters at Treasury, to rush ppensioners to their death as fast as possible so their pension is no longer another state outgiong payment the treasury is keen not to pay at all, so it was always about lowering the Government financial liability.

    also we are very woried that any choice to put terminal patients to death is now kept confidential not to be opened to inspectionby famaly or any other person or agency who wants to check on how the billl kis used.

    1. Treasury is capable of identifying that less than 100 people per year within 6 months of death (half not yet on super) offers little saving in super payments.

    2. Don’t be ridiculous Cleangreen, I suppose you think George Soros is behind it as well and Treasury are going to harvest blood of dead babies to help him live longer.

  5. We now have a situation where the government can choose whether or not to pay for drugs to extend someone’s (and quality of) life by a few years. Without those expensive drugs the latter person is now qualified for much cheaper government sanctioned euthanasia.

    Sounds like a massively worrying, deeply toxic, society changing, conflict of interest to me.

  6. I can’t understand why anyone thought this euthanasia bill was necessary.
    It isn’t as if it has ever been difficult for kiwis who are sick to knock themselves off.
    I’ve known a few people who have decided that was the best option, they’ve done it and there was no blowback – people understand.

    AFAIK the only prosecutions over this have been from types who made a big issue about it after they had helped mum. dad or whoever to slip the veil.

    On the other hand I have also witnessed private ‘hospitals’ knock off a human who hadn’t asked for it, but the bill payer, tired of blowing more than $1000 per week on their former partner, did ask.

    This isn’t just a slippery slope we’ve chosen, it is a needless journey.

    Meanwhile the same types who agreed that is is OK to knock off an aged relative because his/her continued existence has become inconvenient, simultaneously decided that none of us have the right to have a puff if that need/desire should arise.
    Hypocrisy much, every person who voted yes to euthanasia, no to pot needs to be mustered onto the next available flight to england where they will fit in as snug as bug in a rug.

Comments are closed.