Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

18 Comments

  1. Of course there is funding issues right now but what if for instance applying a financial transactions tax or whatever ends up paying a negative return in the case of loses ends up giving tax credits back to them. What if the government borrowed and took a stake in superannuation funds so it could post it’s precious surplus every year at 5% return on $200 billion?

    A qualitative analysis with a strong Asian background who’ve never made a mathematical error in his life would have to proof any financial calculation and make it work anyway.

  2. They can have that tax cut if we disestablish the 14,000 extra bureaucrats Labour has added to the Wellington headcount.
    We can have an even bigger one if we close the ‘demographic ministries’ that achieve nothing and never have.
    Replace your Bill Nighy video with something from Yes Minister! or Gliding On.

  3. You can: just go back to the old rates. Abolish the G.S.T., abolish all top bracket and corporate tax cuts, and bring back the universal Family Benefit.

    That would return the top income rate to 76.5% for the bracket over $8m (Nash Administration level), and the corporate rate to 45% (Muldoon level).

    The old Family Benefit level (Nash era) is such that a breadwinner earning the average wage, with two children, would have an effective tax rate of zero.

  4. Watch this space.

    Labour are very good at one thing. Adamantly claiming a policy they are cooking up is right…..and couldn’t possibly be wrong. They are a reactive Government rather than proactive. Masters of the U-Turn.

    The Cycle Lane on Auckland’s Harbour Bridge one of many examples.

    Aucklanders hated the idea and said so. They were ignored by the lycra wearing Micheal Wood who went further and arrogantly chastised the public and told them it’s happening and just get their head around it. Nurses were incredulous. They repeatedly told the Government their work conditions were unsafe and this needed to be addressed urgently but were told there was nothing in the kitty.

    Tens of millions was spent buying properties on the Northern side of the bridge and consultants were paid millions. Nek minute a poll came out that highlighted the overwhelming majority of Aucklanders didn’t want the cycle lane. We know what happened next. Call me old fashioned but shouldn’t Governments do genuine due diligence before spending tens of millions of tax payer funds…. especially on pet projects?

    Our tax system is a mess and it’s antiquated. We saw that highlighted again when only Auckland went into lockdown during Covid but the Government was allowing businesses in the deep South barely impacted by the lockdown to apply for wage subsidies etc because the IRD system couldn’t distinguish if a tax payer was in Auckland or Southland.

    There are also considerable inequities through the system that are not being addressed despite this Government allegedly being all about putting inequities right.

    It’s obscene to have GST on our supermarket food bill but that’s in the too hard basket. (pardon the pun)

    Now there is a poll out showing it’s not just the wealthy that think tax cuts are a good idea. The majority of Kiwi’s now want tax cuts. This is at the same time Labour are repeating their big NO to tax cuts.

    We know Labour are extremely motivated by re-election and will do / say just about anything to help make that happen. They know now that National are getting traction with tax cuts policy.

    My confident prediction here on the 30th of May is you will hear a gentle U-Turn commencing on the subject during June. The time has run out for a working group to be formed and policy put forward pre-election so it will be a fast forwarded cabinet decision. Before the end of August Labour will have done a complete U-Turn and new tax cuts policy will be in place and being promoted by September. Take this to the bank.

    1. Unfortunately for Labour the time-bomb of a fuel tax reset is inevitable. The punters will see a jump in fuel prices as the tax goes back on. Nice!

  5. A universal FTT would not just hit the wealthy, it would hit everyone with a a KiwiSaver account.
    The reason that OECD countries do not have a universal FTT’s is that they would be fiendishly difficult to apply. A number of European countries do have FTT’s. But they only apply to a very limited range of transactions, such as equities trades. As such they produce limited revenue.

    A much more sensible approach would be a Australian style CGT. That generates enough revenue for the first $20,000 of income to be tax free.

    It also makes sense that New Zealand and Australia have broadly similar tax systems. introducing a CGT and the first $10,000 or $20,000 would do just that. A completely new tax, such as a FTT would simply promote capital flight.

    I would also note that New Zealand and Australia tax a similar percentage of GDP, around the low 30% range.

    The promoters of wealth taxes, FTT’s, etc have as their goal, the fundamental increase of the total tax take to much higher levels of around 40% of GDP. A level that is more typically associated with some of the Nordics, with their much more intrusive styles of government. That will also promote an exodus to Australia, both of people and of capital.

  6. Putting all MP’s on the Minimum Wage would probably sort out the wood from the trees, many of the bludgers would bail and get a real job, only those who were truly committed to doing some good for the country would stay. Seymour would be one of the first to bail, however his well healed m*te’s would kindly pay his salary to keep him there.

Comments are closed.