Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. Did the SIS really poll New Zealand to see who the biggest security threat was ? Good lord. I thought that was their job.

    Does this mean that I can no longer talk politics with checkout operators ? What about taxi drivers ? They often know more about what’s going on than the media do, but half are foreign imports now and are fairly disenchanted themselves.

    I have trouble accepting that the SIS is asking Kiwis what our biggest security threat is, and if they did, then I would like to very politely suggest it may have been a colossal waste of taxpayer funds.
    The Neighbourhood Watch ladies could have a field day here.

  2. The SIS appear to be solution champions looking for their problem, now putting national security out to tender and asking: Who would you like to be ‘the other’? Thank god for these unelected intelligence creepers and their departmental diversity officers. But I’m confused, the US deep state recently said terrorism opens up incredible opportunities. Is some terrorism good and some bad in this safe space?

    1. Ethan Woke. So are you saying that ‘shit stirrers ‘ and ‘ solution champions ‘ are the same thing ?
      I don’t think so. This looks more like the old ‘ divide and rule ‘ dynamic to me, makes us suspicious of each other, sets people against each other. Or it could just be thickish public servants trying to find out what their job is.

      Whatever, it’s no good. Possibly in wake of USA McCarthyism, allegations of communism were made against specific candidates in the 1952 New Zealand snap election and mud sticks; it impacted on school kids.

  3. Well said. And you’re right: “Firstly, what the fuck would your average Kiwi know about national security threats? It’s like asking a bunch of school children who their favourite brain surgeon is!” In fact the poll listed a pre-selected group of about 15 ‘threats’ for the respondents to choose from, since they would probably have bugger-all idea without hints. When asked to volunteer a ‘threat’ not on the handy list the majority declined, but of those who did offer a suggestion the highest percentage proffered “The government – threat from / posed by the government / mistrust of the government”. Too bloody right. We’re not that bloody stupid.

  4. The poll is a f…g outrage. Perhaps they were checking to see if their propaganda is working and people are registering the threats that the media are telling them are there.

    I mean what can I say? How bloody embarrassing. Do they have no shame? Dads Army anyone?

    Some Australian arsehole who is the scum of the earth comes here. He was a lone wolf and the security services missed him. My understanding was this bastard chose NZ because he thought this was the place people would expect to feel safe (how many trrrorist attacks have we had again?)

    I read part of the dob in a terrorist document and it said words to the effect that there had been very few attacks here so they looked overseas to see what they found are the signs someone is or could carry out a terrorist attack. Very useful if anyone is planning an attack. Note to oneself”terrorist thinks “don’t share with my neighbours that I am experimenting with bomb making equipment, pretend to have the same political thoughts as others, act normal and friendly.

    Those seeking revenge for petty misdemeanours such as not using someone’s pro nouns have a newfound way to make the culprits live hell. Simply dob them on via 0800 Stasi

    1. Anker. 100%. I can’t believe that they’re doing this. I just cannot believe it, is is so seriously dumb and divisive.

      In the pandemic we had PM Ardern telling us not to speak to the neighbours, which was very hard for elderly persons living alone, and it really frightened some, possibly more so when she said that her government was the only source of truth. That makes ‘truth’ an absolute, a concept I wouldn’t want to discuss with a politician. Now these SIS people are telling us to view the neighbours, and God knows who else, with suspicion.

      The Australian runt was a runt, literally, a shortie, a small town outsider, achieved zilch, got an inheritance, used it to travel, saw the big outside world for the first time, jumped to too many conclusions and only felt at home with other outliers. The rest is now part of this country’s terrible history. It’s bad enough that it is being used to curtail freedom of speech, but these sort of Dad’s Army tactics are not something which the social community needs. We’re not at war, and nor do we want to be. Whoever thought it up should be pensioned off. Again, it is probably going to frighten persons who simply do not deserve to be frightened, victimise others. What a mess.

  5. The biggest “National Security Threat” is infiltration of NZ’s sovereignty by The WEF/Davos. Unfortunately our wonderfully competent security agencies did absolutely nothing to stop that (rather they’ve been cheering it on).

  6. If they did a poll to work out their priorities then they are a marketing led organisation checking where on the political spectrum their main customers/audience sit. How else do they increase their budget and internal profit and expand power. Is it any better system than having some ex military guys spying on unionists and maori calling them commies and seeding politicians to chant reds under the bed?

    1. Joseph. So are they former SAS personnel then ? Like the SAS officers who flew to the US after the 9/11 2001 attacks and lobbied to join the Afghanistan war as recorded by Hager and Stephenson in “Hit & Run”?

      Like the ex-SAS Major -General who advocated ‘cauterising’ insurgents from the population, and said “ I do not care for the word ‘peacemaker’ “, as recorded by Hager and Stephenson. The “ Hit &Run” report contains much about the SAS and about what happened in the Tirigan Valley and elsewhere, but I am not inclined to reread it as I have potatoes to plant.

  7. I don’t think it is a better system and the union/maori/commie stuff surely is going back a few decades?

    but your point about a marketing led organisation is bang on

    1. Anker. ‘ The Rural ‘ reports Ardern saying that we need to have a public conversation about security. I don’t quite know why she thinks that we need to have a public conversation, but it’s likely to make some folk even more anxious and unsettled than they are post the various covid restrictions, and probably unnecessarily so. It could be another diversionary tactic, but if it’s all a marketing ploy to obtain increased funding, then asking Joe Blogs what it/they/ she / he sees as security threats is very much on a par with Mallard, incredibly, asking the public to nominate their most obnoxious music to blast the Parliamentary demonstrators with. They should not be asking, or having to be asking such things were they professionals doing a professional job. If it’s a fishing expedition, that can be counter- productive, and if they need or want to increase their budget without seemingly knowing why, it’s exceedingly odd. Juxtaposing the need for ‘public conversation’ with anti – free speech laws is also a bit difficult.

Comments are closed.