How does NZF Hate Troll Rhys Williams define a woman?

ByMartyn Bradbury

So Winnie wants to import America’s culture war and erase Trans people from existing.

Charming.

Personally I think Winnie needs to define what a man is first, because real Men don’t bully minorities for political shits and giggles.

A real man doesn’t denigrate the environment on a climate change burning planet for trans-national mining interests.

A real man doesn’t falsely accuse Harry Tam of smuggling a covid infected prostitute across boundaries during lockdown.

A real man doesn’t mock migrant Politicians.

A real man doesn’t insinuate another is a child pedophile with only ‘bussy’ as evidence.

A real man doesn’t excite rednecks and Anti-vaxxers.

A real man doesn’t take from the poor to give to the rich.

A real man doesn’t implement policy for donations.

So how does NZF Hate Troll Rhys Williams  define women Winston?

The smear against Benjamin Doyle was manufactured by Toxic NZFirst Troll, Rhys Williams…

Businessman behind toxic online Benjamin Doyle campaign

The anonymous online account that helped spark a political firestorm over Green MP Benjamin Doyle’s past Instagram posts is run by a businessman who is a former NZ First member, The Post can reveal.
Rhys Williams, from New Plymouth, is behind the inflammatory X (formerly Twitter) account @2ETEKA, which last month unearthed posts from Doyle’s pre-Parliament Instagram page, “BibleBeltBussy”.
The controversy centred on a post where Doyle, who uses they/them pronouns, juxtaposed a photo of their child with explicit sexual terminology. The posts were amplified by NZ First leader Winston Peters, who called for a police investigation into Doyle.
While criticism of Doyle’s posts has come from across the political spectrum, the backlash quickly morphed into a torrent of abuse, including baseless accusations of criminal behaviour. The nature and intensity of the online attacks have raised questions about the boundary between legitimate scrutiny and harassment.

At the centre of this campaign is @2ETEKA, which has called for more dirt on Doyle and relentlessly targeted political opponents with slurs, smears, and thinly veiled allegations of paedophilia.

There is no evidence suggesting NZ First is involved with the account. The party said Williams is not a current member.

…funny last comment there regarding no involvement by NZF  because of course Rhys was on The Platform claiming NZF paid for Inflection Point, but then that interview was suddenly removed from The Platform…

…So how does Winnies pet hate troll define women?

Well look for yourself…

…I think NZF toxic hate troll Rhys Williams broad definition of women is  ‘bitches’.

Charming.

NZF has quickly become as Toxic as ACT and just as vile.

These people are despicable and they want open season on the Trans Community because they are hateful damaged people.

Any human being with any sense of decency should hold NZF in deep contempt.

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. None of this bullshit is about “defining what a woman is”.
    It’s about prescribing what the WORD “woman” is allowed to mean – and then enforcing that meaning with implied threats of violence against any departures from the ‘correct’ usage. It’s extraordinarily authoritarian.

    Like all words, “woman” can quite legitimately have multiple meanings that depend on social context. It can validly mean different things for prison authorities, sports administrators, or HR departments trying to build harmonious workplaces with a diverse range of people.

    Note: you can’t define what anything “is” without using language – other than by raising your arm and silently pointing at what you believe to be an example of the thing in question. This is of necessity an argument about language and what language is allowed to mean.

    1. And for clarity – this nonsense comes from both radical biological essentialists who insist that “woman” must always mean biological adult female in all social contexts, and from radical anti-essentialists who insist that “woman” can mean whatever they want it to in all social contexts.

      1. it’s oat milk territory. these attacks are ghastly with their gaslighting bullshit. ghouls. it’s a fucking hate crime. so called conservatives in this country attacking fellow citizens are a sham and a disgrace. a few eco-cons will shut them up with their snowflake bullshit. print that in your report and smoke it.

  2. I wonder if any here have seen the cartoons of Ronald Searle in his Non-Sexist Dictionary (he has searched for some routine words with ‘men’ in them and replaced with ‘women’, he embracing she as the saying goes.
    Searle had encountered real brutality in his war service and that no doubt aided him in his views about the terrible sexism of language affecting females badly.

    https://www.comicsreview.co.uk/nowreadthis/2018/08/12/ronald-searles-non-sexist-dictionary-2/
    …During the Second World War he was a Japanese POW at the infamous Changi Prison. The second St Trinian‘s cartoon was drawn in that hell-hole in 1944 and it survived along with his incredible war sketches to see print once peace broke out. Searle was a worker on the Siam-Burma Railroad (a story for another time and place) and risked his life daily both by making pictures and by keeping them…

    …despite being 30+ years old [pub 1989] – this sharp and immaculately depicted slice of satirical buffoonery still affords a chuckle or two, but the truly magical aspect of this book is the unforgettable collection of black and white cartoons delivered with stunning absurdist candour and the peculiarly tragic warmth that only Searle could instil with his seemingly wild yet clearly-considered linework…
    You will laugh, (it’s impossible not to) but you will also grieve and yearn and burn in empathised frustration at the marvels in this lost supply of ordinance in the Battle of the Sexes.

    Sorry I can’t find my copy to demonstrate the pathos and bathos of this book.

Comments are closed.