Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. So are we saying that the illegal status of cannabis is about the privileged status of pharmaceutical companies and the liquor barons who seek to maintain their ‘market share’

    &/OR

    Are we saying that the medical profession has intentionally ignored research outcomes for cannabis so as to appease their pharmaceutical company overlords while maintaining their position in the healthcare hierarchy?

  2. A couple of decades ago I read a news item where Prince Charles during one of his public walks asked a MS sufferer if s/he had tried cannabis, as he had heard it was a useful medicine. So Charlie knows all about the weed. At the time, I thought he might be indulging in a sadistic joke – as in – “Try some weed that’ll help you. (the unsaid bit – Oh you can’t because it is prohibited for you peasants, hahah!) “.

    The denial of the proven benefits of cannabis to sick people is one of the biggest example of the evils of cannabis prohibition. Of course, the insistence on allowing it only for medically supervised deserving sick people, shows that insister still has a bit of waking up to do.

    So, has Tampax Rex got a little ironic smile on his face these days? Is there something about his eyes? Is he indulging in more “Goonisms”?

    “Death to cannabis prohibition! and bad luck to its minions!” I say most times I have a smoke.

    Thank you for your work Tadhg!

  3. The story behind this study shows how the narrative around cannabis has been manipulated over the years. What could have happened if the public and policymakers had embraced this research back in the ‘70s?

  4. Cannabis was banned and demonised in all countries the globalists could exert power over in 1924 on September 28th simultaneously. The photograph of Jay Z proves time travel and the US government has come clean about this tech along with others undisclosed. Ever since Dubya. Or before.

Comments are closed.