Similar Posts

10 Comments

    1. Helena The various comments like yours show a lack of understanding of what money is. Money is a token that is allocated to income earners to enable them to get access to the goods and services they have created. The ‘wealth’ of a nation is not money, which is virtually an IOU, it is the goods themselves. The various comments suggest that all this money appearing fortuitously has been created by the Government. Not so. The Reserve Bank buys the visible currency (notes and coinage) at production cost, so they may pay 50c to buy a $50 note and that money is then on-sold to the private banks AT FACE (i.e banks pay $50 for a $50 note), mostly to fill ATMs. This is a nice little earner for the Reserve Bank (the process is called siegnorage and is a standard process) so I cant see what you are worried about, Helena..
      However notes and coin amount to only about 2% on money in the economy. The other 98% in the economy is invisible money – invisible because it consists purely of computer entries and can only be ‘seen’ on your Bank statements. How does this electronic money come into being? The private Banks create if from absolutely nothing whenever they create a loan, mostly for mortgages. Obviously this is very good for the banks but not good for us because they charge interest on it.
      Where then does the Government get the money it is “splashing around”? From international Bankers, who will have created it from nothing and will charge NZ interest on it. Now, Helena, you should be very worried

  1. Hi Ross

    Although your blog contains some useful history in terms of recent gold standards it leaves a lot to be desired, episodes such as the (Eric) Volcker Shock or price controls. Also an end to a fixed gold standard doesn’t mean and end to gold as a representation of value, Isn’t it possible to have a floating gold standard? Is it coincidence that as the Fed has continued to issue fiat notes the value of gold in those notes has continued to climb? Criminals as I’m sure your aware often use gold as a medium to launder money.

    But more importantly you fail to answer your original premise, “What is money?”. You correctly point out that the origins of money lie in exchange, to quote Marx, “gold is not naturally money, but money is naturally gold”. But why is money gold, and what is being exchanged? or further, why is a universal form necessary to exchange different goods, what is common between them? Is this not the origins of value which money represents as a social medium?

    I think there is another distinction you miss, gold bullion as a product of private capital versus cash and fiat money (not to be confused) issued by the state.

    Anyway if you find any of these questions intriguing I would suggest this blog, I have found it very helpful.
    https://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/money-as-the-universal-equivalent/

    Thanks for your attention, and time.

Comments are closed.