Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

21 Comments

  1. Great report Pat! The revolutions in Syria, Palestine, Egypt and the other Arab states from Morocco to Yemen are one struggle, one revolution! F**k the RT socialists who think that this is all been engineered by some all powerful CIA and the ordinary people are dupes without agency.

  2. Very interesting trip you had Pat. And that proves that Assad maniacally gassed his people in Idlib how exactly?
    D J S

    1. Has no one ever heard of, ‘Occam’s Razor’?

      Or how about it’s opposite counterpart; ‘Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof’?

      All sides agree that a gas attack happened, all sides deny responsibility.

      The rebels say that the gas was dropped on them from government aircraft.

      Chris Trotter says the rebels committed the gas attack on their own people to discredit the regime.

      The Russians claim that a regime bombing raid, accidently released the nerve gas when it struck a rebel arms store, where the nerve gas was being stockpiled to use against the regime.

      Bashar Assad has (all but), said that the gas attack on the rebels was committed by the US.

      If all sides agree that a gas attack happened, but no side claims responsibility, then we have no choice but to use logic to conclude that the most likely perpetrator was the one with the most resources and means to deliver a gas weapon, and with a history of keeping (and using) such weapons.

  3. Chris Trotter is questioning the reliability of information originating in the US, based on past experiences. see the report by Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
    at http://www.commondreams.org/views/2017/04/11/trump-should-rethink-syria-escalation
    Trump has made it clear that he considers himself above international law. Anyone who thinks some countries, particularly the US and Israel, are so exceptional that international law does not apply to them, cannot be a friend of the Palestinian people.
    All the Palestinians have going for them is global grassroots demands that Israel obey international law. That is what BDS is all about.

  4. Well funnily enough, Pat, there are Palestinian militia fighting on the side of Assad
    And it was one of your precious revolutionaries, a so called “moderate” who decapitated a helpless young Palestinian boy on the deck of a ute, and gloatingly videoed the whole thing

    1. And it was one of your precious revolutionaries, a so called “moderate” who decapitated a helpless young Palestinian boy on the deck of a ute, and gloatingly videoed the whole thing

      Details please, Francesca? Do you have a link to any reference?

      1. You must have seen the video of Nour al Din al Zenki, US backed and supplied “moderates” beheading the Palestinian boy.
        Google Al Jazeera 21 July 2016″Rebels behead 12 year old boy”
        The US state dept was embarrassed in to saying they would review their support, and the group swiftly distanced themselves from the fighters involved. One of the men was also the photographer for the “boy in the ambulance” As far as I know the US is still backing this “rebel” group
        Liwa Al Quds is just one of the pro Assad Palestinian militias, you will find them mentioned in the same article

    2. This is crazy stuff Francesca, Chris Trotter is claiming that the Rebels are dropping gas bombs on themselves, and you are claiming that Palestinians are killing their own children.

      A strange way to fight the Assad regime, for the rebels and the Palestinians to attack their own wouldn’t you agree?

      Maybe there have been no attacks on the Syrian people by the regime at all?

      Maybe all the reported attacks on rebel held areas, were committed by themselves?

      1. You are seriously off the track here
        I am saying it was some of your revolutionaries or “rebels” as they are more often named, who beheaded the young Palestinian boy.
        Sorry If my writing was not clear
        Can you name the true democracy, freedom loving groups you refer to?

        1. I am saying it was some of your revolutionaries or “rebels” as they are more often named, who beheaded the young Palestinian boy.

          Link please, Francesca?

          1. I’ve already given you the provenance of my info.Surely its not too much for you to do a quick google search . Its pretty specific
            Alternatively you could teach me how to add links on this mac computer, I haven’t yet mastered it.

          2. ditto to you Frank.Either guide me through how you add links to comments on a mac, or take the trouble to search for the Al Jazeera article. I’ve even supplied the date and the headline.
            Suggest it will be quicker for you to do that
            Sorry, if I’m going to comment I really need to learn how to do this linking stuff

          3. Ok… I haven’t used a mac computer since the late 1990s (and they’d be museum relics by now). So I’ve pretty much forgotten how OS systems operate. Does Copy & Paste work the same on macs as on PCs? No idea.

            I’ll do a google search on the info you’ve provided.

      2. So you utterly reject the Seymour Hersh investigation of the 2013 Ghouta attack, the Carla del Ponti UN report, the testimony of the jailed Turkish politicians who whistle blew that the sarin for the Ghouta attack was supplied by Turkey to the rebels?
        And the UK analysis that found the sarin used in the Ghouta attack was not of the sort that the Syrian govt was in possession of
        James Clappers advice as revealed in an interview with Obama, that it wasn’t “a slam dunk “that Assad had done it, which caused Obama to retreat from his red line
        Seymour Hersh’s piece is “the Red Line and The Rat line, published in the London Review of Books”
        I don’t think any one has found Hersh to be a flakey investigator
        Theodore Postol of the MIT has challenged this latest allegation of Sarin attack, as he did the Ghouta attack.
        All well worth reading, as is your own article.
        I like to look at all stances before coming out guns blazing

        1. and incidentally I use the AlJazeera reference as Qatar (whose pipeline after all is at least one element central to the whole Syria debacle) is owned by the Qatari royal family and is no friend of Assad.

    3. That’s why it’s called, “Civil War” piting families against one another, just like the American Civil War etc. Patrick didn’t say anywhere that it was stright out one country against another, as it’s more complicated than that. Mistrust throughout the areas, country against country, people of the same country fighting each other, but Asad has denied that the gassing ever happened, then in the next breath said, it was done by locals, not his troops, then said that his country doesnt have chemical weapons, so what is true??

  5. Respect for having done so, Pat, but maybe ‘demanding’ from the Egyptian military was not…..the best strategy ?
    Anyway. Easy for me to say.
    Now, it is 7 years later. And the ‘people’s revolution’ you write of ‘against the tyrant Assad,’ has devolved, by design, into a foreign mercenary war of attrition. By all other reports, not civil AT ALL.
    Instead, a vicious and cruel enemy actually cutting the heads off ten year old boys and even younger girls dressed in their Sunday best; eating the innards of murdered soldiers, throwing gay men from rooftops, deploying false flag gas attacks against the hostaged people of Syria and Iraq with regularity, with impunity..including just reported in Khan Sheikhoun and Mosul a day ago.

    Whatever ground swell you saw in 2010, Pat, is done for now.
    The ‘people’s Color revolution’ was either a start up by NGO deepstate cut-outs, or a genuine uprising very quickly taken over by the dark forces of western covert power. The terrorist entities have TAKEN the revolution OVER. And are not at all interested in liberal democratic reforms.
    CIA MI6, MOSSAD NATO have put their hand in that glove, and are now beating the crap out of the people of Syria. As intended. As projected by the ‘PNAC NEOCON’s. Using thousands of FOREIGN mercenary fighters to do so. Not Syrian. Foreign mercenary terrorists. Attacking cultural heritage sites and key infrastructure, using the people of Syria as fodder.

    The SAA sound much more like a people’s army. Not ‘Assads” but ‘Syrias’. Fighting for their country which is under attack from without. Not within.

    ‘Leftist RT apologist’ reporters on the ground in Syria, among them Patrick Henningson and Vanessa Beeley at 21stcenturywire, inform us against the best propaganda auntie BEEB and CrapNewsNetworks can buy, that these terrorist imports are not progressive democracy loving FSA at all, but mass murdering fuck-heads: proxies of ‘the regime change wars of the new Amercian [sic] century.’
    The western media fake news is so FAKE , so corrupt, it can’t even spell its own name’ and you buy what they Sell you, at peril.

  6. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCU9gnBsxGs
    Please READ:
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/04/17/busted-idlib-gas-attack-fakers-murder-68-kids-in-bus-slaughter/
    Children Murdered for Propaganda Videos
    “Swedish Doctors For Human Rights (swedhr.org) analysed videos, the rescue after an alleged attack by Syrian government forces. The doctors found that the videos were counterfeit, where even Arabic stage directions were overheard, and that the alleged “Rescue” in actuality is a murder. On first analysis, it looked as though the doctors working on the child assumed he was already dead.”

    1. I point out the Veteranstoday statement alleging specific ‘at-that-moment’ murder of the child being injected is contested by SWEDHR who, while accepting the overall counterfeit nature of the WH presentation, maintain a degree of separation between the probable, becoming the certain.
      The ‘ultimate’ death of the child is affirmed. The timing and cause not.

      “Swedish Doctors for Human Rights has never accused the White Helmets of “murdering children”. Neither we have accused of such atrocity the personnel showed in the video published by White Helmets. We took special care of formulating our conclusion as to exclude any accusation of intentional killing. This is instead the conclusion reached by the author of the SWEDHR article, Prof Marcello Ferrada de Noli, after doctors at SWEDHR examined videos published by White Helmets in YouTube:

      “Conclusion:

      ‘Lifesaving’ procedures on the children showed in the White Helmets videos were found to be fake, and ultimately performed on dead children. The syringe used in the ‘intracardial injection’ performed on the male infant was empty, or its fluid was never injected into the child. This same child showed, briefly, discrete life-signs (uncertain in my judgement) in the first segment of WH Vid-1. If so, this child might have died during the lapse in which the ‘lifesaving’ manoeuvres showed in the White Helmets movie went on. (Which is not the same than affirming that the personnel seen in the videos caused the dead of the infant. In forensic terms, the actual cause of death, as well as the mode and the issue of intent, refer to different items than those treated in our analysis).”

      Professor Marcello Ferrada de Noli, chairman
      Professor Anders Romelsjö, vice-chairman
      Swedish Doctors for Human Rights, SWEDHR
      http://theindicter.com/statement-by-swedish-doctors-for-human-rights-on-misrepresentations-referred-in-veterans-today-article-on-white-helmets/

Comments are closed.