Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Best part of the commune system?
    “the public service had to be done at workmen’s wages. “.

    Worst part of the commune system? It is but a step towards full communism. ”
    “Thus in Marxist theory, the commune is a form of political organization adopted during the first (or lower) phase of communism, ”

    For once a commune is established
    “But in order to join and become an integral part of the provincial federation, the commune must conform its own particular charter to the fundamental principles of the provincial constitution and be accepted by the parliament of the province. The commune must also accept the judgments of the provincial tribunal and any measures ordered by the government of the province. (All measures of the provincial government must be ratified by the provincial parliament.) Communes refusing to accept the provincial laws will not be entitled to its benefits.”

    So who “elects” the state and provisional overlords in the politburo to set the “fundamental constitutions”?

    Would a commune based on capitalistic principals, as voted on by the commune members (as in an Isreali Kibbutz) be tolerated by the ruling elite?

    Worth a read

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commune_(model_of_government)

    Even from the start the ruling elite were not happy with the Paris Commune model. How dare the members wanting to sort out the democractic process first instead of storming Versailles.
    “Marx found it aggravating that the Communards pooled all their resources into first organizing democratic elections rather than gathering their forces and attacking Versailles in a timely fashion. ”

    The commune model is the first step to communism where the power of the commune is destroyed to cater for the overlords in the politburo. Democratic communes are gone. Not a good model of governance, or at least as bad as any we know of currently.

    1. You need a bit more imagination than that of quoting old blueprints applied to today’s changed conditions. The Capitalocene threat of extinction changes everything. But the principle of mother right that allowed society to survive for 100,000s of years will center the new commune. If the mothers’ protection of their children was key to the survival of hunter gatherer society before it fell to the patriarchy, think how much more that protection is necessary today facing our species extinction. Past communes were works in progress under specific historical conditions. Democracy and equality have to have a guiding principle. I think it is mother right. So lets see what lessons we have learned from the past and apply then to building the commune today.

      1. So when is your commune being organised? One thing to say what is needed, another to actually do.

        Or are you going to be sliding on someone’s coat-tails?

  2. I would argue that the godless heathens did not worship the European god, and then later on the acceptance of the theory of evolution allowed European conquerors to designate non white ‘others’ as sub human, and deserving of even further exploitation.

    The conquerors retarded offspring [from alcohol, harmful grains like wheat and processed foods like flour and sugar, awful spine affecting shoes, clothing and harmful medicines, as well as sickened exploitative thinking] would then interbreed and infect healthy and in balance nature worshipping societies with sickened blood lines, sick ideologies and the bad habits of unnatural diets and medicines.

    **Infant deaths and famines were and are natural processes that kept the herd strong, much as the wolf keeps the caribou strong.**

    These were removed by modern man, in his drive toward autonomy from god and experimentation and manipulation of god given rules and laws. The weak got to live and breed. We have a surplus of food, which kills just as readily as a lack of food.

    This loss of belief in a space travelling creator with a 3D bio printer that seeded the various humanoid sub species, is also a very important date point that initiated deleterious belief regarding mans relationship with the earth.

    Early man was given instruction via passed down teachings and books like the bible, this was to preserve the earth and man, as well as all the other creatures.

    Olde societies had and still have enshrined beliefs that served to protect the hand that feeds, mother earth. All of the ancient world practised earth preservation religious ideologies.

    Now, the godless scientists and bureaucrats still looking to make a buck out of gods garden, have a new plan to reverse their earlier legacy.

    All the while, ‘primitive’ man who still worships ‘spirits’ and still also follows ancient teachings given by the wise ancient seeders [gods] and passed down for millennia.

    This loss of earth preserving spiritual teaching of olde, and the furthering of various materialistic ideologies continues to drive ‘who’ and ‘what’ but not ‘why’,, which remains hidden in our spiritless descent from grace.

    This grace period is drawing to a close.

    Nature is inherently capitalistic. The strong bull who passes on the best genes helps to keep the herd and the planet in health. Favouring all as equal is not in line with scientific common sense. The road to global redemption is narrow, and the old rules and laws are just as important today as before, much more so as things are heating up,, and the prophecy of being consumed by fire appears to be coming to fruition.

    Fiyah pon Babylon.

  3. By 1492 England had built its cathedrals, Europe’s great orchestras we’re formed and the Chinese had sailed around the world.
    There was a healthy trade in spices, silk and other goods between Asia and Europe.

  4. The Ottomans never entered the heart of Europe. Thus, the Capitalocene marks the beginning of European society colonizing the world and nature to launch global capitalism. Why was the Capitalocene so important?

Comments are closed.