Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

4 Comments

  1. Yep TraitorKey will be remembered for being that ‘con artist’ that tried to change the flag and so badly botched it, even though there was a huge desire to get rid of the Union Jack, mainly because his huge ego got in the way.
    The man was a carpet bagger, a USA pawn and is still a disgrace to NZ democracy.
    Thank God he wasn’t in the position to be the ‘NZ Trump’, other than his character.

  2. When the Queen dies, it will be a suitable time to disestablish QB weekend and celebrate our own winter holiday between Easter and Labour weekend.
    Matariki is a truly NZ celebration. it is positive and meaningful – much more so than commemorating wars and massacres. Let’s do it.
    And for those who say it is at variable times – no more so than Easter, and we manage that OK.

  3. Bryan wrote: “While a court document may read “The Queen Vs So-and-so” it really means “The People Vs the Defendant”.
    Wrong. The charge is exactly as it reads. On the occasions that I have been charged in court with offences against the Crown, I never imagined for one moment that the people of Aotearoa had put me in the dock.
    When I was committed to Her Majesty’s Mt Eden Prison for refusing to serve in Her Majesty’s military forces, it was not the people of Aotearoa who sent me there.
    That was the evil work of the colonial regime. Our people did not condone the regime’s actions, and they did not consent and they were in no way responsible.
    Bryan wrote: “I voted against the change (to the New Zealand flag) – not because I have any great affinity for the Union Jack (quite the opposite in fact ) but because I thought the reasons for changing it were wrong. Key’s language was all about “branding” . It was the language of neoliberal commercialism and I really didn’t want a flag fluttering over our parliament that proclaimed “Business Rules Here!”
    If you are not a colonialist at heart Bryan, why did you not abstain, as did most of our people? Why vote to retain the colonialist flag?
    Those who argue that the monarch is irrelevant are trying to avoid acknowledging the evil nature of the colonial regime which she heads. It is also, like most colonialist propositions, profoundly untrue. If the monarch was irrelevant, an oath of allegiance to her person would not be a condition of citizenship and civil rights, including the right to sit in parliament.
    Like others on The Daily Blog, you claim “NZs neoliberal economic settings as the main cause for social issues.” That is very easy to say if you purposefully resist any attempt to investigate the impacts of colonialism upon our people. The truth is rather that the introduction of neo-liberalism into the New Zealand economy and society was only made possible by colonialism.

Comments are closed.