Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

4 Comments

  1. BB may have cast me to the ether some years ago (for what methinks neither knows) but to this I say..
    Hear! Hear! Bryan Bruce

  2. These historical facts about the neoliberalism corruption of NZ should be carved in stone somewhere and reiterated every election time. That way Jacinda and company could still be nice, but they would get the facts out there and save themselves thinking up new, usually ineffective, ways of getting the “wellbeing” message across. Every election the supposed “left wing” is forced to invent new routes to victory and keep from offending right-wing people at the same time. Why don’t they just tell the facts instead?

  3. Now I remember where I saw the two thumbs up nonsense I heard mentioned on the nation this morning by the ambitious woman.

  4. Discussion point. A truly equitable CGT would mean claimable losses during periods of downturn, such as 2007 – 2012. While there have been some ludicrous gains since, the balancing effects of inflation and periods of loss (e.g. recently in many Oz cities) could mean govt nets very little from CGT in the long term. The failure of minerals prices has hit the Oz economy hard. Their CGT has had minimal or no impact on house prices, and has certainly not created equality. NZ needs a much broader review of tax and income, it needs a much narrower range of salaries, and it needs to focus the economy on genuinely sustainable growth based on environmental protection. The CGT is a red herring and is a soft option for govts unwilling to make hard decisions.

Comments are closed.