Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. Why should Maori have their own Parliament? The John T party is such a circus that the status quo appears better structured to accommodate all comers, it and does so already, irrespective of genetic anomalies.

  2. Various indigenous peoples around the world have their own assemblies and Councils. The Kingitanga, Ratana etc. does not affect others largely until the likes of this CoC Govt. attack Māori.

    Allowing referenda for whiteys to strip Māori Wards from local Govt. is blatant and the Natzos and Act are going to get it back in spades.

  3. Fine with Maori having their own parliament and their own area or areas where they can have complete autonomy and jurisdiction – these can be also be coupled with funding their own hospitals / roads / social services etc from their own taxes as well.

    Let’s just pull the pin and split the country between the ‘genocidal colonists & ‘friends’ and those Maori who no longer want to be a part of a unified New Zealand.

  4. “They all have a particular dislike for Māori ”
    they have a general dislike for anyone that they consider is beneath them, particularly the poor. Sprinkled with fear. They’ve had this since at least the 1500s.

  5. The problem with that James Brown is who would use the cycle ways.

  6. “The government is always going to win a showdown between order and anarchy.”

    it’s all a bit anarchy these days. didn’t luxon promise de-centralization. lol

  7. Last Thursday our people raised tino rangatiratanga and whakaminenga flags on the State Highway bridge which passes over their awa and whenua. A week later those flags remain flying, and they may well remain there permanently. That indicates a deep seated community commitment to the principle of mana motuhake. It is not decided what form tino rangatiratanga should take, although many will have strong opinions on that. I think it fair to say that a “Maori parliament” which is a carbon copy of the colonialist parliament would have limited appeal. Most favour a radical departure from the current colonialist system of government, which would also constitute a return to the natural organic forms of governance which preceded the colonialist era and which have been maintained on marae throughout that era. This issue is bigger than the parliamentary Pati Maori, and it is bigger than the colonialist parliament as a whole. People can stop jumping up and down, and start thinking dispassionately about what form of government they want to replace the Westminster system in our motu.

  8. The only power imbalance is your team didnt get enough votes in the last election. Now we have to put up with your grizzling for at least 6 years.

  9. Geoff, the Westminster system is largely an unwritten constitution. Look at an example of a written constitution, that of the US whose preamble reads:

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    This is the Enlightenment background plus the principle of toleration which underscores the liberal democratic tradition. These are the values upon which we agree to be ruled by a government freely chosen by us all in a fair procedure.

    1. There are advantages to a written constitution, and there are reasons why New Zealand does not have one. To be specific, if the Realm of New Zealand’s actual and present constitution was written down in plain language there would be a national riot, while if New Zealand had a written constitution on a liberal democratic model the colonialist regime would lose its trump card, which is the ability to remove all democratic institutions through a sovereign decree.
      You write “we agree to be ruled by a government freely chosen by us all in a fair procedure”. If that is the case (it isn’t really – I for one have not agreed to the British monarch’s claims to sovereignty over Aotearoa, and I have not agreed to the rule of any government established the sovereignty of the British monarch) then it follows that we must also have the right to reject that government. It makes no sense to claim that we “freely choose” something which we are given no right to reject. Westminster does not give us democracy. Only rangatiratanga can.

Comments are closed.