Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

10 Comments

  1. Got excited when I heard the word, Green deal, but upon reading realised that this post had nothing to do the environment.

    Environment is often absent in the new Greenwashing of the word “Green” to eliminate the environment and instead concentrate on growth, growth, growth for people.

    Sad that the Green Party has fallen victim to this approach, by their own swords, and other people now freely use the word ‘Green” politically outside of environmental issues, and that is reflected in Green falling voters in NZ and a huge gap for the environment that is absent now in NZ politics in real terms.

    Green is now greenwashed to be all about people growth and traditional labour issues… not the environment.

    And if the Green Party which is full of Labour loving MP’s not environmentalists, does not get 5% which could be a possibility, then it might bring down Labour too.

    So bad for anyone’s term of New Green deal.

  2. We are also never going to improve social outcomes when lobbyists, political parties and groups can now buy information that has been taken without consent like on Facebook and sold for money or given away without any thought to it. This is then minned, sold and used for targeted social media campaigns based on individual profile data being used. That should be banned.

    Apparently in the US election, data profiles were collected about Democrat voters and used to make out Hillary Clinton was a racist to black democrat voters for example so they did not vote… similar in Brexit for Northern voters, individualised hate or disruptive campaigns are now made a lot easier with modern technology and data misuse, that is not being curbed by governments.

    In NZ you see race being used constantly for the MSM which is turning people off policy and onto race triggers instead of policy. Very devious and the left are blind to what is going on, and actually very likely to be targeted into be fooled into thinking that is real, or some issues are huge, this makes the lefties echo the media on identity politics, which tends to be a massive turn off for most people and helps the Natz.

    Brittany Kaiser: Ex-Cambridge Analytica employee talks back
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/2018726938/brittany-kaiser-ex-cambridge-analytica-employee-talks-back

    “The penny dropped two weeks after Donald Trump was elected president, Kaiser says.

    Colleagues on who had run the Trump campaign showed her their working methods.

    “And they showed me some of the most horrific things I’d ever seen.”

    They had created target groups of Democrat supporters with the aim of discouraging them from participating in the election.

    “They used strategies to weaponise racism and sexism to make people hate their neighbour to make people not believe in their government.”

    Since leaving Cambridge Analytica she says she wants to atone for what she became involved in.

    “I consider myself a very smart person, but as I was writing my book, especially going back and tracing every single step, I wonder was I motivated to financially support myself and my family or was I motivated by power? I don’t know but something seduced me.”

    She is now a privacy activist and has co-founded the Digital Asset Trade Association (DATA) and says she wants political ads to be banned on social media.”

    1. Peter Thiel, Trump Key supporter, who got NZ citizenship while not meeting the criteria and doesn’t even live here, doesn’t believe in democracy and was the former board member of Facebook and early investor of Facebook.

      GUESS WHO’S BEHIND FACEBOOK’S POLITICAL AD POLICY
      Peter Thiel has reportedly been lobbying Mark Zuckerberg to refrain from fact checking political ads on the platform.

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/12/peter-thiel-behind-facebooks-political-ad-policy

      Peter Thiel’s view of the world…

      “In a 2009 essay called The Education of a Libertarian, Thiel declared that capitalism and democracy had become incompatible. Since 1920, he argued, the creation of the welfare state and “the extension of the franchise to women” had made the American political system more responsive to more people – and therefore more hostile to capitalism. Capitalism is not “popular with the crowd”, Thiel observed, and this means that as democracy expands, the masses demand greater concessions from capitalists in the form of redistribution and regulation.

      The solution was obvious: less democracy. But in 2009, Thiel despaired of achieving this goal within the realm of politics. How could you possibly build a successful political movement for less democracy?

      Fast forward two years, when the country was still slowly digging its way out of the financial crisis. In 2011, Thiel told George Packer that the mood of emergency made him “weirdly hopeful”. The “failure of the establishment” had become too obvious to ignore, and this created an opportunity for something radically new, “something outside the establishment”, to take root.”

      https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/21/peter-thiel-republican-convention-speech

  3. Great article Mike! Good to see the summary of protests around the world – most of which the MSM is studiously ignoring 🙂

    I’m really curious about where a genuine working class political force is going to come from in New Zealand. The Labour Party has been taken over by middle class people with degrees and most of our activist movements seem to be populated by educated types who look down on working class people. In a grand display of irony we disguise our own prejudice by focusing on the prejudices of the working class but the effect is the same as it always was, the working class continue to be kicked in the teeth.

    I also wonder about a global movement in terms of Labour and environmental battles. I imagine this will be the only way to beat back the corporate beast.

  4. All the suggestions for NZ sound good in theory but where and how do you introduce checks and balances for those that abuse the system. For 2 years I volunteered to teach basic cooking to young welfare families. Some were great but others were drunk or smoking weed when I arrived. Others just were not home when I went round. I found children home from school just because them woke up late so the cycle of poverty and underachieving carries on the next generation.
    Union power is another case of abuse of workers and their relationship with the bosses by officials with an axe to grind.If the power is used correctly it can be a win win but so often it is not .
    Human nature is hard to control for the good of all as some see any concessions as a sign of weakness

    1. “I volunteered to teach basic cooking to young welfare families.”

      I’d be really interested to hear more of the practicalities of that, and in particular, any noteworthy success stories. It is such a basic, essential skill and can make a huge difference to a person’s health and family life, yet many leave school without it.

  5. You say you lived through the 1960’s and 70’s ‘during a similar period of challenge and change’… well didn’t we all,… and yet you and I , and everyone else still lived under a governmental system that had capitalism as its mainstay…

    Just a few points left out of your article, one being that not once did you mention the capitalism on steroids version , – neo liberalism.

    You know as well as I that the part where you mention the changes of the 1980’s and 1990’s were an exceptionally radical change in favour of the far right. You know as well as I that was when the rot really set in. In the west.

    The second point is that in no way shape or form can you even begin to compare rural south american country’s with their counterparts in NZ. Not even a shadow of similarity’s. The demographics and cultural attributes are completely different. Even as far as belief systems go , they are different. While many south american country’s adhere to Roman Catholicism, we proudly announce we are a secular nation.

    We do not live in traditional extended family groupings but in small nuclear units. Thus the sense of community is hugely different.

    For these reasons alone , you will be struggling to even get these measures off the ground,- or at least a significant portion of them.

    What works there does not necessarily mean they can be replicated here. Much as you may want them to be. Therefore, to bring down neo liberalism you need a whole new set of tactics, – though the long terms strategy may bear some similarity’s. One that can take into account environmental issues as well as social responsibility when conducting private enterprise.

    The Blairite way , the third way , is cancer. It is nothing more than a variant to maintain the current status quo.

    What you want , … is a system that dismantles neo liberalism.

    THEN , … you will start to realize some of the things you and others would like to see, – and not before. You are going to have to accommodate business and capitalism whether one likes it or not. It would be wrong to do away with it altogether, – partly because solutions can be sequestered by those willing to work in with a new order of govt, … what is needed is a way to curb radical corporate tendency’s.

    And you do that politically. It is not the fault of the far right wing that they managed to neutralize the left,- it is the fault of successive sell outs in parliaments who found it easier to go with the flow and not oppose it. It was the fault of voters who resigned themselves to their new situation. It was the fault of opportunists in parliaments who saw an angle not only for their political careers but also a way to make large profits by supporting these developments.

    In other words, – human nature is to blame.

    And no amount of altruistic ideals and wishful thinking will change it.

    But there is one thing that will : money in pocket. Cash , Moola, Dollero’s. Thats right , – an appeal to the base instincts and greed and sense of self interest that enabled neo liberalism in the first place. Take fínstance tax,… and a sliding taxation system whereby those with more pay more. We all want that, dont we,… make those rich fat cats pay more . And then wages, ooooh boy… dont we all want more in our pockets at the end of every working week – who wouldn’t vote for that?

    But to do this needs some pretty hard core believers in what they are about to do. And that means overturning the fall out effects of the Employment Contracts Act 1991 for a start. Almost 3 decades later ! Only then can we extricate Bill Englishs proud boast of being a ‘low wage economy ‘.

    And then there’s the issue of the Reserve Bank Act , – and bringing it under direct govt control again.

    A third and brilliant one in its simplicity would be to do what Chris Trotter said about China in the 1950’s and how they re-nationalized their corporations and assets, – by legislating that those corporate’s over a certain size were required to have 25% govt shares , and thus govt officials on the board. Then increasing those shares over time by increment.

    Good bye Australian banks and their leeching.

    And all of it needs no one to be hurt or die, no bloody revolutions in the street, no trying to fight any police,… just a nice peaceful democratic takeover from what was once stolen from us.

    Oh, .. and a reinstatement of trade unions in their rightful place as protectors of workers.

    I’m sure you and others could easily extrapolate many other ares where the neo liberal edifice can then be attacked. Who cares what they think or how hard they bleat? Just do it.

    They cant complain, its all democratic, – but before you do , – make sure you have a wall of information ready to refute their inevitable lies they will try to raise. Shut down their media talking heads. Turf out those govt dept heads who are quislings for the neo liberal concensus. Replace ’em . Get rid of them.

    And just do it.

    Give it 5 years and they will be a faded memory distasteful in the minds of those of us who had to live through their odious impositions. No one will want to go back to their particularly socially and economically destructive brand of failed governance.

    Now the only thing you WILL need to affect this is tight security. No moles, no leakers, no ‘ double agents’ , – the penalty being instant ejection when caught out. With a ready statement of denial of any of the inevitable lies they will try to put over the media. Make them look like a wild conspiracy theorist or something.

    And thats how you do it.

    Money in pocket

    Changes in legislation

    Security

    And a ruthless determination to change and legislate against a corrupt and anti democratic system.

  6. About building or growing people’s power or effectiveness at a local level, – it is entirely do-able. If you search around there are examples of success in all the listed areas. But it’s a grass-roots thing, I think, where each venture begins from the ground up. Just a few keenly interested people initially, can begin something that benefits many more.

    How about this for a community Festival of Carts 🙂

  7. Until we change the way money works we will change nothing.
    Fiat currencies
    Fractional reserve banking
    Compound interest
    All these must go first
    Then we can change our world.

Comments are closed.