Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

2 Comments

  1. Ah yes, the politics of inclusion, where we turned on our gun owners after Christchurch and punished them for the action of the Australian terrorist.
    Safety could have been achieved by making all centrefire semiautos E category (extremely highly vetted, extremely high security, zero incidence of gun crime), but no, moral hysteria was incited and agendas pushed through.

    This story above has been the same endlessly repeated story run on every news channel in one form or another: how “happy” gun owners are, how “well” it’s all going. North Korea would be proud.
    It’s bullshit spin of course.
    Read the comments on these articles where they appear online, read the police association and Stuart Nashes Facebook pages to judge sentiment (at least the ones they haven’t deleted yet and no the vast majority of these posters are clearly not from overseas) these changes and how they have been done are despised by most gun owners.
    Not a great state of affairs if we want maximum compliance, and with more compliance needed for upcoming registration.
    Police threaten 5 years jail to firearms license holders who don’t hand back a now illegal gun,yet a couple of weeks back a criminal non license holder (who beat his wife) was caught with a pistol in his car and got home detention.
    Who is the system seeking to punish?

    It was estimated that there are maybe 350 000 firearms in NZ which have now been made illegal by the new law, only a small number of which are Mike Clements “evil by their nature” guns, most guns swept up are lever action .22s and shotguns or centre fire semiautos with small internal magazines.
    Ask the police for a breakdown of how many guns are centrefire semiautos that could take a large magazine.
    They won’t tell you but the number will be very small.

    And don’t buy the lie that police don’t have an idea of how many guns there are in the country and what type – every single gun coming in to this country (except illegal gang smuggled guns) has had an import permit signed by police.

    So 12 000 is a small drop in a bucket of 350 000.
    Police will claim success no matter the final tally of course. Stop and think about what it means if the end tally isn’t close to 350 000.
    Do you feel safer?

    1. Keepcalmcarryon: “Ah yes, the politics of inclusion, where we turned on our gun owners after Christchurch and punished them for the action of the Australian terrorist.”

      I agree. Right from the beginning, I’ve been ambivalent about how the government has handled the aftermath of the Christchurch shootings.

      That ambivalence extends to the gun buy-back scheme. Even though intentions were of the best, the unintended consequences have been the effective criminalisation of a hitherto inoffensive, law-abiding group of citizens. And causing said citizens to be at the very least wary of further co-operation with the police, let alone being willing to be compliant with what the state requires by way of gun registration in the future.

      “Police threaten 5 years jail to firearms license holders who don’t hand back a now illegal gun…”

      This is completely extraordinary. I’m astonished that neither police nor government apparently see the sheer blinding idiocy of this. Were it not so serious for the license holders, I’d characterise it as Clochemerle-ish.

      “So 12 000 is a small drop in a bucket of 350 000….Do you feel safer?”

      I didn’t feel unsafe to begin with. Though the fact of the gangs having guns has always been something to be aware of.

      And who expects that the gangs will hand in their guns? Pigs might fly…..

Comments are closed.