Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. Its not the presenters I dislike, it is the amount of shit they are required to talk that is unappealing

  2. Yep, it’s a desolate wasteland in our so-called media:

    One headline caught my eye however, but not for the reasons the Herald want their readers to believe.

    26/11/16 – “First home buyers in? Auction clearances down” http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11755007

    It’s not written as such but in reality it goes like this; As Auckland’s Ponzi scheme begins to stall the Herald are now advertising to first home buyers to take the leap and go into 2 lifetimes worth of debt. Why, well a distinct lack of buyers and confidence is threatening the very existence of property bubble and suckers are badly needed to fill the void that greed inc, namely investors vacated, for whatever reason.

    I can confirm accurately that in this tempest of building fever and cranes dotting the skyline, some construction companies are teetering on the edge.

    As crazy as this sounds it’s true. Because most of the construction is been encouraged by misinformation from our government as well as greed, the result is it is sapping all resources to do the job, (a trend worldwide with cheap money and greed awash). Additionally and again because greed, suppliers are upping prices massively between the time buyers sign on the dotted line and the time the house is actually completed, now almost universally delayed by months.

    Those stories of developers asking for more than originally agreed to is because they are getting burnt, badly. Agreed prices today do not equal costs at completion sometime next year or the year after.

    Its stating the bloody obvious but our property market is in a very bad place and there is a very worrying storm brewing. There could be a collapse sometime between signing and taking possession. Do you want to take that risk?

    But loyal as ever the Herald know it and also know, I wager, that the fate of their beloved National Party is linked to it. Hence recklessly encouraging those with the least money to get on board now!

    Oh and Nicky Watson is going to get her breast implants removed. God our media is absolutely shit!

  3. I read the so-called “open letter”…

    What a load of self-serving drivel.

    “But to have 30 editors sign their name to this letter is a highly unusual show of unanimity and, rather than proving the point an NZME and Fairfax Media merger would result in a lessening of diverse editorial views, it should be seen as a reflection of the deep concern we have that your decision to reject the merger will inevitably spell the end of our ability to maintain quality national and local journalism at scale for New Zealanders.”

    I suppose the irony of the above statement has completely escaped the 30 signatories to the “open letter”?!

    The author of the “open letter” denies that “an NZME and Fairfax Media merger would result in a lessening of diverse editorial views”.

    Those words followed the author lauding “a highly unusual show of unanimity” by 30 signatories.

    No lessening of diverse editorial views then? Not with 30 editors all agreeing to sign one document?

    Were there any dissenting views by NZME or Fairfax editors, and if so, will they be published?

    “We decided to write because in its draft decision the commission didn’t stick to the economic analysis but strayed into intangibles such as the quality of journalism and unquantified risks to editorial independence, and that is territory where we live and work every day.”

    So the signatories all believe that the Commerce Commission understood economic analysis? Yet, to borrow the words of the author, the Commission ability to assess economic analysis is also “where [they] live and work every day”.

    Editors may know their editorial stuff. I suspect the Commerce Commission knows their commercial stuff.

    But this is the bit that took my breath away;

    “By the way, this letter has not been commissioned by, nor approval sought from, the CEOs or shareholders of our businesses. We are speaking as editors whose only concern is the protection of journalism and journalists.”

    Really? So newspaper editors are now making comment on business decisions that up to now have been the responsibility of the CEO and shareholders?

    I find that a bit hard to swallow.

    Especially when newspapers do not, as a rule, post news stories of their own commercial issues. Especially where mass redundancies have resulted.

    Which begs the question; would those 30 signatories have signed an “open letter” opposing any mergers? If so, what would have been the consequences for their ongoing employment status?

    Because I’ll bet anything that the contracts of each editors contains clauses that restrict disclosures which might be commercially sensitive or embarrassing to their own media companies.

  4. The towering pachyderm in the room is the fact that you,Martyn,and John Campbell are the only two journalists in a population of 4-5 million who espouse any liberal values…if that is not supression I dont know what is…and why are you not allowed on national radio?

  5. The architects of public opinion are revolting and engaged in revolting against their own narrow view of the world but in the wrong direction; working toward smaller dissenting views rather than greater, just think about how much national propaganda we are served up compared to opposition party views we get and the negative slant place on Them!

  6. I just don’t bother with this fake, fabricated and manipulatitive news anymore – wish the rest of NZ would do the same. Let’s start with clean slate in 2017. Better broadcasting please!

  7. I read the open letter. All I could think of was what a load of self-self, pious bollocks. All thirty of those people are so far out of touch with reality that LSD couldn’t give them a bigger ‘high’.

Comments are closed.