Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

31 Comments

  1. The Rent Freeze is at the top of my wish list at the moment.
    It would bring stability to many aspects of life in AO/ NZ.

    1. Yes, this should be near the top of the list. You can up benefits etc, but we all know where a lot of the benefit increases end up going.

      The outdated and no longer fit for purpose Reserve Bank mandate needs addressing to rein in the property ponzi scheme. This monetary policy madness has already done untold present and future damage.

      Adrian Orr is champing at the bit to inflate house prices even further with negative interest rates.

      1. Yes Polly, benefit increases are immediately factored in by landlords, and ZZZAPPP! they’d be gone in a blink. So, rent freezes first, or at the same time.

  2. Increase in Natl Superannuation is what I & many, many other super annuitants urgently need – every time I go to buy food, prices of some items have increased. I NEVER drink “out” nor do I eat “out” EVER. No films EVER, no concerts EVER. No money for subscriptions to any organisations. In my eighties I still have $25k mortgage to pay off. As a NZRN I was paid “sixpence” all my working life – which Multiple Sclerosis cut short by many years. Even the Winter Energy payment is calculated so as to be unfair to solo super annuitants. It costs as much to heat a lounge for 1 as it does for 2. I barely use my heat pump – I use a hot water bottle on my knees.

    1. Why don’t you run for office in the next election instead of just writing and demanding and talking but actually get nothing done? Is this a joke or what, Mr Bradbury? Stop giving the left a bad name.

      1. Hard to see why advocating on behalf of poor and downtrodden people should be a bad thing to be doing.

        Hard to see why Mr Bradbury should be criticised for not actioning what pollies keep failing to action.

    2. As a pensioner myself I felt sad to read your comments. I am not wealthy but am able to enjoy doing thinks with friends.
      Without knowing your circumstance can I suggest you look at a reverse mortgage. You obviously have a property which in the current climate would be worth good money . Many of our generation seem to feel they owe it to their children to leave a legacy but it should not be at the expense of your own enjoyment which you deserve.

      1. I think that’s good advice, Trevor. Isabel, maybe have your place independently valued. You might be surprised, as even in the last few months almost all property values have ballooned further. Then consider a Reverse Mortgage?

      2. Trev many retirees with families know if their home is not passed on then their kids will have little chance of ever owning a home.
        Isabel are you eligible for an accommodation supplement with that mortgage and your relatively low income.

    3. Isabel – If you do look at a reverse mortgage they may want you to get it valued by a valuer of their choice, at your expense, ok ? This is what happened to me when I considered it a while back.

      Four years ago a chartered accountant explored it for me, and told me the best choice – hopefully I still have that info somewhere – but whether it still stands as best choice, I wouldn’t know. The Consumer website may have something. If I can find mine I can let you know – I have rather a lot of paper files, not all well organised.

      I mentioned doing it to one of my kids once, and got a negative reaction, but they’ve had inheritances already, and are much better off than me, so I decided that if I do it, and they’re in no great need, then I will.

      Do try and keep warm – too long being cold, does have a health impact, no matter how stoic one may be!
      Also, if you sit in your property and the value increases, and the proposed Green wealth tax rears it’s head, the govt may hit you with their millionaire tax, but your needs are much more important, especially if you live to a ripe old age. Kia kaha

      1. The cold can be very restricting. A body needs warming rather than a room.
        Op shops may have some warm layers of clothing to keep the legs and arms cosy. The main central body can respond well to warm layers but circulation to the extremities has to be watched. Fingerless gloves are a help as well as mittens when it is really cold. You can use both if not active with your hands.
        Warming a house is just too expensive on a pension

  3. Where will you get the money to do all this? From the Reserve Bank of course, by creating our money supply from nothing as the banks currently and disastrously do. But you cant say that because that would mean supporting Social Credit policy and you will never do that.
    What is the point of removing GST on food when you can drop GST on everything by introducing a Financial T ransaction Tax. The rate required to do that is quite small and wouldn’t be noticed by the man in the street. Only speculators will be hurt. But you cant say that because it Social Credit policy. Tough.
    Now someone will claim how Saint Mike Savage saved the day in the ’30’s by introducing similar policies. Totally wrong. Savage was a conservative like Adhern. The man who promoted those policies and deserved the accolades was John Lee and he was a fervent supporter of Social Credit. In 1940 he was sacked from the Labour party for being a nuisance. Read the book “The Scrim /Lee papers”. On the other hand dont bother, you might learn something.

  4. I only hope that Jacinda and Labour are as useless at implementing their policy over the next three years as they were in the last, quite frankly its the only chance that we have got to get the countries economy back on track!

  5. Hear hear

    Their new National Party rural supporters voted for such.
    FTT is not a good tax btw as it like a CGT requires a disposal….land taxes far better and more immediate especially on rural communities who support the new way even in the mighty Waikato Party vote Labour! ;). The family trusts already prepare annual accounts, easy to clip that ticket.

    Party Votes
    Candidates Party
    AL-BUSTANJI, Ala’13392
    Labour Party16558
    UPSTON, Louise18646
    National Party12781
    FREEMAN, David1519
    ACT New Zealand3889
    GLENDINING, Danna1570
    Green Party1325
    New Zealand First Party1050
    QUINN, Jan-Marie533
    New Conservative591
    The Opportunities Party (TOP)477
    Advance NZ

    1. Or Jeff Bezos!! Some sort of class action suit from Aotearoa, for billions. Bezos filled oceans with plastic, in effect, yet is celebrated as “Richest man in the world”. How does that work again?

      There really is something in what you’re saying. Those few individuals who have hoarded up all the world’s free flowing cash, instead of clapping them on the back and saying, “Good bloke”, they need to be given a sharp tap on the shoulder, and then some reckoning. We just need to sort out the “Hows” and set the ball rolling.

      1. How their rotten system works, global billionaire wealth surged to record trillions

        While Covid-19 has taken the lives of over one million people across the globe and exacerbated economic precarity for millions more, the combined wealth held by the world’s 2,189 billionaires has skyrocketed—increasing by 27.5% between April and July 2020 and reaching a record high of $10.2 trillion.

        “The super-rich got even richer while millions of people around the world lost their jobs,” tweeted Richard Burgon, a British Labour Party parliamentarian. “That’s not a coincidence,” Burgon added. “That’s how their rotten system works.”

  6. Yes I am looking forward to some kindness and the Maori lens promised to us by Ruawhe ( from the Te Tai Hauauru electorate)

  7. The idea of rent to own state housing is absurd, state housing should be provided by the government for a limited term as a safety net. It is not the role of government to be both a wholesale housing developer and mortgage lender to beneficiaries.

    It is NOT a right to own a home, for most, it is an aspiration that takes considerable effort and sustained dedication to achieve. Why deplete the state housing stock and provide a shortcut for people who by all objective measures have not earned it, this only serves to increase the burden these people are upon the rest of us.

    Currently the government charges as little as $100pw; if i rent to own a 400k property, for 5 years, i pay 26k – in reality most of this would have come from a benefit anyway so did i really pay at all? in this interim, the property has likely increased in value by 100-150k, i then sell the property and pocket the difference. I didn’t address my dysfunctions, i didn’t study, i didn’t apply myself, i didn’t take a risk, i didn’t reign in my vices, i didn’t earn a thing, yet i walk away with a fortune courtesy of the tax payer.

    How is this fair? where are the fraction of market rate mortgages for the rest of us?

    Digital extortion like the one proposed in Australia – hm, the phrase don’t bite the hand that feeds you seems utterly applicable here, if i were in charge of google i’d simply remove you from the results rather than pay you – media companies of old need to adapt, traditional broadcast media is awful, any time i turn on the TV i am reminded how horrid it is, it needs to die.

    Lowering the voting age, this is the opposite of voter suppression yet is motivated by the same intent, the perceived benefit of one end of the political spectrum.

Comments are closed.