Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

11 Comments

  1. Agree 100%. Also stop dispute resolution confidentiality and non- disclosure clauses from being almost automatic now, and thereby protecting bad employers. Also there is no good reason why government dept bullies, in particular, should be protected by confidentiality agreements.

  2. You need to ask yourself…. Is this story relevant to the UN? If so, expect action, if not…. meh!

  3. Though I agree with this article, it’s not going to happen.

    If you’re an employee and you’re being bullied, put in unsafe situations or not being paid – leave!

    Don’t wait weeks, months or years! Leave today. I can understand why people don’t, however you have a responsibility to yourself too.

  4. Agree hugely that worker and labour rights in NZ should be tightened up.

    But “Any employer exploiting vulnerable workers, including migrant workers, shall be referred to the criminal courts.”

    Shouldn’t it be any worker being exploited has the rights for their case to be referred to the criminal courts? Not just vulnerable workers? Why make the distinction? Worker exploitation is across the board in NZ and getting worse with more scams.

    Joanne Harrison for example managed to make redundant workers who were questioning her criminal frauds.

    Then there was professors and lawyers bullying or sexually harrassing others.

    None of these may fit the ‘vulnerable’ worker discourse that the media and woke love but are not acceptable ways for colleagues or managers to behave in their employment roles.

    It is extremely easy for people to use power in NZ against others, and not always in the woke sense that government has become obsessed about, such as migrant exploitation (while woke are seemingly encouraging migrant exploitation with more migrant work permits, for lower end jobs and for longer. While also having non NZ citizens able to bring in work visa applicants into NZ so it’s a free for all).

    NZ workers are easy to exploit as NZ workers often have a ‘trust’ model and so are easily exploited by scammers who seem to be everywhere in NZ.

    It’s actually considered good business in NZ to exploit labour here.

    A starting point for helping workers should be compulsory redundancy payments.

    Another change necessary is that ERA should be able to hear all labour cases equally not just those in “employment” so that contractors, gig workers and so forth don’t have additional discrimination to them by being a ‘get out of jail free’ card for abusive employers and employment scams as they try to make every worker outside of employment to ensure they don’t have to pay minimum statuary contributions. (Employment scams are increasing across the board in NZ not just for migrants and vulnerable people. )

    If we want to keep NZ a safe place for labour here, then government need to update the employment laws with the times.

    There needs to be a complete system for redress for labour disputes across the courts in NZ. NZ is falling behind the world (and OZ) and it is starting with our abusive labour laws that encourage labour exploitation in NZ and have a very narrow view of it.

    ERA needs to be more user friendly, more like disputes tribunal and tenancy tribunal.

    There should be under $50k courts for Labour disputes, over $50k courts for Labour disputes and then collective or test labour cases, which is when there are legal points to prove in discrimination to keep up with the growing labour scams and exploitation, aka not paying holiday pay, uber drivers etc.

    The payments are also so low from ERA that people’s legal costs are over the pay outs so for middle class workers. There is little incentive or penalty in NZ to provide decent benefits for labour here.

  5. This government has trapped renters in a situation where they cannot move, they have to find the landlords extra $150 a week, they are stuck. They cannot leave an area. They cannot afford to leave their job. Their lives are hell. They are depressed, anxious and worst of all, often suicidal. At least the slumlords are happy though hey?

  6. UTU for Workers Union seems a hybrid activist organisation angling for social change and doing some case work and education along the way as they put the fear of the proverbial into some of the worst exploiters.

    If we had a class left, regularly fighting central labour organisation, such adventurism would not be necessary. CTU officials turned up at the bus strike/lockout today, dunno, because it was in Wellington? I will be watching their statements closely on this because if they cannot make significant noise about venture capitalists locking out essential transport workers then they may as well retire.

    Remember Matt McCarten started Unite union for the untouchables, as other unions deemed fast food and migrant workers, and is a credible ongoing force today. So who knows where UTU might end up. “Living Wage” was a movement that got tacked onto some unions work flows and has delivered in some areas while a flawed programme imo that does not necessarily increase union density.

    So good luck with UTU.

Comments are closed.