Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. FOLLOW THE MONEY, just the usual trait of many NZers, as I sadly observe, certainly the more pro capitalism ones.

    No wonder we have so many former politicians and also business leaders get cosy with Mainland Chinese banks, businesses, corporations, and end up in positions where they compromise the interests of most NZers to levels that get close to treason.

  2. This seems like nonsense to me. The NZ Government could trivially regulate water as it sees fit (after all, just about everything else is regulated without general (lat alone Maori) consultation so I don’t see it as a sticking point). Exploitative whoring water out for foreign interests could be halted as quickly as a Thanos snap. e.g. just create legislation that if said water doesn’t directly contribute toward the wealth of NZ citizens generally, then its extraction is a hard no. Done and dusted.

    1. re …”doesn’t directly contribute toward the wealth of NZ citizens generally’

      ….”wealth” defined as environmental health

      1. Environmental health would obviously be a key consideration (in fact, you’d hope that is case already!).

  3. Of all the political parties NZF stood on a platform of NO sales of water overseas!

    …so I fail to understand how it can be solely NZF’s fault that water under Christchurch is being sold off

    …this Coalition Labour , NZF , Green Government needs to get some balls and change the law and ECAN fast!…so that NO NZ water can be sold overseas.

    …otherwise Christchurch will sink into the hole left by the drained aquifers…as it has been sinking since the earthquakes

    …(if dairy drainage of the aquifers under Christchurch and the Waimakariri hinterland did not not cause the earthquakes in the first place!)

    ..and the pristine Christchurch aquifer water runs the danger of seawater drainage and back contamination….this is how cities die

    PUMPED DRY: The Global Crisis of Vanishing Groundwater
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjsThobgq7Q&feature=youtu.be

    I fail to see how privatising water to the control of Maori Corporations will stop the sale of New Zealand water….these corporations may also sell water to the Chinese as they have considered also doing deals over pounamu (greenstone)…another taonga.

    Also why are some on the Christchurch City Council also considering selling off water under Christchurch as bottled water overseas?

  4. It’s not difficult – impose the cost on exporting water. The recycling cost of the PET bottles should also be recovered. Doesn’t hit small irrigators.

    But it’s gone a bit far in some communities already – some public water supplies have become unsafe to drink. No commercial water right can be permitted to trump safe domestic supply.

  5. This can easily be resolved by legislation… NZ Government is more than capable of protecting its interests eg., legislated protection of its poison industry

  6. Canterbury’s water allocation zones are almost without exception over allocated or fully allocated. Other parts of NZ are approaching the same scenario so …why are we not discussing the fact that we continue to grow our population and our economy without either the water to support that growth or the regulations to allocate water where its needed. Time to connect the dots Minister Parker – quickly.

  7. Refusing to put a price on water and the bottling of our water are two separate issues (which perhaps means we can’t blame NZF). We can and should ban bottling (for export or completely) and THEN choose whether or not to put a price on water. Two things are certain: firstly, if we put a price on water it will not stop the bottlers (it will in fact make it easier for them to acquire consents to take water) and; secondly, if we don’t stop the bottlers we will very quickly lose our last reserves of clean drinking water. A royalty is not the solution to the bottling problem.

Comments are closed.