Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

19 Comments

  1. Militarizes nations fight wars, not large social/economic issues.

    A cashed up military wants one thing, to fire those god damned guns.

    FFS those on the left who the military is the answer to the coming climate crisis, show about as much clarity of thought as the hard right militarists who think all we need to do to stop the warming, is to drop a few nuclear bombs to clog up the atmosphere with dust.

    This mad rush to embrace our violent instincts never works out well.

  2. “…China is our Economic Overlord, Australia is our loud mouthed rude neighbour and America is our 5 Eyes Political Master, so to think we will be immune from such volatility between China, Australia and America is delusional.”
    Isn’t this the truth.
    Australia is very loud because they think they have the complete backing of powers much larger than them but would change their attitude very quickly if those same powers were forced to drop support for them.
    Both Australia and New Zealand should prepare for a future that no longer has America as the sole global super power and take a fortress Pacific approach. That means spending alot of money on our defense and on supporting Pacific economies much smaller than ours which means increasing taxes to pay for it all. Anyone advocating less will be selling us out for capital gains on their rental properties.

  3. His Evilness, Emperor Xi, has a grand vision for a new world order . And it looks suspiciously similar to the inside of a concentration camp.

  4. I think if Labour needed the Greens to stY in power the cou try would be in danger of being seen as a lame duck partner as they would push to demilitarize .Not sure of how the Maori Party would use their power if the were in the power split.Another reason to look at getting National Act into power.

  5. The hideous nature of the National party in the accompanying photos Martyn is a stark reminder that NO we cannot and never again trust the corrupt National party.

  6. Yes.
    Except there is no independent foreign policy, we are with America or China.
    Those are the choices.

    1. I agree. I think all the rest is window dressing.

      We can have all sorts of ideals but sometimes you are faced with a choice you dont want to make and there isnt any getting around it.

      1. And we choose to go with China over the US we have shit for brains.
        It’s that simple.

  7. Where and how does a small nation defend a rules based order?

    By hiding away, or everywhere.

    If its hiding away – we have our economic zone, we have our associations – Cook Is, Niue and Tokelau. There is also the continental shelf and Antarctica. Mining, fisheries and disarmament.

    If it is everywhere, we do not do it alone.

  8. Why is there so much opposition to Michele Bachelet, human rights chief of the UN, visiting Xinjiang to .assess the state of the Uighurs?
    Surely this is the right thing to do?
    Or is it similar to the first Sec General of OPCW being outright threatened with violence for promoting the mutual agreement with Iraq to conduct regular inspections looking for WMD.The US didn’t want this happening, because they needed the propaganda that Iraq had WMD, and knew full well that Iraq didn’t have them
    They were intent on war, and sent John Bolton to threaten Mafia style, Bustani ,the first sec general of OPCW.This is how the institutions of the UN have become degraded.
    Its disappointing to see so much propaganda being swallowed hook line and sinker.The American empire is fraying at the edges and I for one will be pleased to see it gone

  9. This is not a pro-America comment, simply realism as I see it. China’s meteoric economic rise is entirely based on a globalised economic system a product of Bretton Woods. A US bribe to build an alliance against the USSR during the Cold War.

    The globalised system is now collapsing to be replaces by closed networks of trading nations. Foreign manufacturers are exiting China, to places like Vietnam partly because of the rolling covid lockdowns but mainly because the 12-fold growth in labour costs means China is no longer the worlds low-cost, low value-added manufacturer. It is now cheaper for some US companies to manufacture in the US (less the sunk costs of existing infrastructure). As a result the US is on-shoring production, re-industrialising at the fasted rate in it’s history.

    About 80% of China’s energy is imported and about 80% of that comes from the Persian Gulf. The physical pipeline infrastructure does not exist to redirect the oil that Russia would send to Europe towards China. Tankers are the only option and that supply could be choked off or redirected by US/NATO forces in multiple locations that the Chinese Navy does not have the range of capability to defend. The Ukraine war will take at least 5M bpd off global oil supply by the end of the year, expect China to have to bear the brunt of most of that.

    I could go on, lockdowns, block on exporting fertiliser, rolling blackouts, collapsing property ponzi scheme taking a significant portion of the middle class intergenerational wealth with it, demographic collapse (yes families can now have 3 children but that will take 18-25 years to make a difference).

    The CCPs internal messaging increasingly has a cultural revolution 2.0 flavour with a focus on Han ethno nationalism. Increased militarism and blaming foreigners for everything (which has been going on long before covid) suggests that CCP strategy for maintaining authority will be based on ideology as they can no longer claim legitimacy due to full stomachs, housing and a guarantee of improving economic conditions and quality of life for the people.

    The CCP has successfully hamstrung China in multiple ways, this is worsening under Xi. Anyone who thinks the CCP is far-sited with 5 year plans, (rather than reactive and corrupt) is not paying attention. In short China’s success has stood on globalisation and Deng’s reforms. America is in the process of pulling the globalisation rug out from underneath them and Xi’s worldview is very different from Deng’s. Further the US Navy has every capability to cut off the majority of China’s energy supplies leading to a trend of de-industrialistion and ultimately famine and civil unrest.

    China’s moves into the Pacific make perfect sense as it is the only region where it has any hope of consolidating power. However without access to new energy supplies and facing US/NATO opposition it’s difficult to see how China lasts more that a decade.

    Worry more about the conflict and shockwaves of a China collapse rather than a new Chinese overlord or a China-led world order.

    IMO the only chance China has is if the political and social disfunction and manifest corruption in the US leads to civil war or in some way neutralises the US ability or will to project power globally.

    1. Yes, thank god they have a fatal flaw (energy and food imports), and have made stupid choices

Comments are closed.