Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

23 Comments

  1. This ‘Standard’ columnist is still selling the con that unemployment is “low”.

    Only 56% of the working age population were in regular employment last quarter (i.e. full time permanent).

    The last number I saw for the number of homemakers, students and disabled came to around 9% total.

    39% of the workforce either unemployed, or scraping by on irregular odd jobs!

    And consider the poor quality of the jobs. The high wage manufacturing and mining jobs were deliberately destroyed. Nobody cares if you created garbage waitressing and tour guide jobs: they want their decent jobs back, at the same high rates of the early 1970s.

    1. You’re on the money @ Kristoff. Definitions of (un)employment result in counting up those un/employed. The stats. Define (un)employment differently and different understandings emerge.

  2. Ironic, isn’t it? This Government makes a big song and dance about mis/disinformation, yet could be accused of spouting it.

    The limitations of the figures re the data for the latest MSD report and how Labour presented that data seems very misleading to say the least.

    1. Lies, damned lies, and statistics. Too right @ Chairman. Governments, think tanks and researchers who should know better have used statistics to bolster their ideological positions for eons. Yes, misleading to say the least. At its root is the operationalization of constructs, bit of a mouthful but in everyday terms, how stuff like ‘(un)employment’, ‘literacy’, ‘poverty’, almost anything you can think of, are defined, subsequently counted (with the assumption of what can be counted is in fact what counts), and presented as evidence. No wonder there’s a battle for truth.

      1. Thanks Bozo for tying up present ec/pol methods in a neat package – good for a takeaway to chew on at home.

  3. I got called out on that blog as an act member by a commentor for saying that universal programs that everyone rich and poor get are the most electorally popular policies that left wing govts introduce.

    Also because universal programs aren’t targeted and single people not just families get them they are preferable to my generation which are majority childless I’m a neoliberal.

    Apparently…. Advocating for Keynesian economic policies…. Makes me …a supporter of Milton Friedman because….. Apparently targeted neoliberal spending is more left wing than old school universalism…

    Boy the PMC are delusional in their ivory towers.

    1. Yes the PMC have become delusional, and Labour are their political wing, it’s how you get a 700million dollar bike bridge cos cars bad -ok’d while thousands are in poverty and you still blow 50 million (on good clean PMC anti car Labour voting consultants) cancelling it and still the people are in poverty.
      Far, far beyond a joke.
      I’d like to see some enquiries in to where our money has gone with this government.

    2. Also ignorant, they dont even know the history of the left or how out of wack their ideology is with the founding aims of the labour party. In their view anyone who was centre left or moderate left is now considered right wing.

  4. One of the tribal over at The Standard has just accused Martyn of turning into another anti-Labour troll due to him putting up this post. How pathetic.

Comments are closed.