Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Way out there in the realms of possibility but a meteor strike – a smallish localised one – would be an unwelcome addition. Not unprecedented I believe.

  2. AL brings worse than job losses. It exacerbates the societal dehumanising of eg call centres and bots replacing face-to-face engagements; interaction with AL-reliant ISPs can be a mental health challenge.

  3. Apocalypse Who? What will destroy us first?

    And the answer is….

    Indifference

    Why aren’t we having the same sort of massive protests against the genocide in Gaza, like we did against the war in Vietnam?

    The sad thing is the genocide in Gaza as terrible as it is, is not the worst genocide in the world that title goes to Sudan. And we see the same players, MSF backed by Russian mercenaries and the Sudanese Army backed by Western proxies.

    If we can’t stop war, a solely human endeavor, we definitely can’t stop climate change, or ever have the will or resources to spend on working to avert the other disasters natural or man made that will do us

    1. War? Us humans have been at it for some time, ever since hunter-gatherers started to form more complex societies. I don’t really know if conflict existed in hunter-gathering groups but in the transition there must be something about the appropriation/protection of resources and the dynamics of political power. And surely the psychology of it all plays a big part. Why do men become soldiers? And what psychological forces turn them into brutal killing machines devoid of all humanity? Even if we knew the answers would it put a stop to it all.

      1. It’s arguable that living under Roman Rule is more preferable than living under a nuclear umbrella. That said every culture is shaped by the material necessities of their age. It’s completely feasible that somebody who would disdain modern values just doesn’t understand that our values are better in a 20th century environment than they have been a 21st century environment or a 10th century environment.

        But most importantly culture and ethics are shaped by necessities in the context of their age. While events may horrified today, it’s also because we have a different set of circumstances. Adultery is an issue today, but these days it’s a personal issue between individuals rather than one that calls for a handmaid’s tale because we have DNA testing so if all else fails we can find out who the father is. Well, that and succession these days is a lot less tied to inheritance which means bastards are not necessarily going to rob their trueborn half-siblings.

        While I have doubts about certain aspects of modern society (I’m increasingly sure by the day that Twitter was a mistake, and I mean that society would have been notably worse due to twitter still existing, not that kids these days can sense these things), there’s an idea that goes around sometimes that it’s virtue that makes society weak. That a society that’s cruel is also strong, that virtue is measured against efficiency.

        And that’s both dangerous and wrong. If past societies are better equipped than we were, it’s probably because of virtues that we fail to emulate, not the vices that we’ve overcome.

  4. @Martyn- Good to see that you are starting to realise that Silicon Valley runs the Republicans now, and boy do they have some warped creeps in charge – the “New Zealander” being the one with his foot firmly on the idealogical accelerator. The current NZ Government is firmly backing these madmen – don’t forget it- and they seem to have found upwards of 5 Billion dollars for defence spending when they couldn’t find any money for the ferries and health. They are nothing but corrupt criminals working against the interests of New Zealanders, that should be abundantly clear by now.

Comments are closed.