Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

3 Comments

  1. Great article Mike

    “Another vital statistic was that the percentage of those aged 18-25 who voted went from 41% to 53% and of those two-thirds voted Labour”

    wow if that happened here imagine…

  2. ” The big majority of Labour MPs remain hangovers from the days of Tony Blair and have actively sought to sabotage Jeremy Corbyn again and again since he won the Labour leadership only two years ago.”
    .
    * we have our own counterparts in NZ , the ABC’s , and those neo liberals in Labours caucus who have ensured the neo liberal narrative for the last 33 years .
    ……………………………………………

    ” Corbyn and the left now need their mandate to clean house within the Labour Party to ensure the loyalty of all MPs to the new left-wing party programme . But it is the absolute democratic right of members to go through a selection process for MPs before the next election. They should start giving notice of that intention now. ”

    ** And this is precisely the solution needed in NZ’s Labour party. A ‘cleaning of the house’ . I have called it a ‘ purge’ in the past. ‘ Clean house’ sounds so much more …. neutral , perhaps, …. but amounts to one and the same thing.
    …………………………………………….

    The neo liberals must go.

    1. Great article Mike.

      “The neo liberals must go… And this is precisely the solution needed in NZ’s Labour party.”

      I agree, but hasn’t this mostly already happened? Goff, gone. Shearer, gone. King, demoted and probably gone by 2020. Most of the legendary ABCs (Robertson, Curran etc) opposed Cunliffe not because they supported Shearer, but because they’d drunk the kool-aid and believed 2014 would be won or lost in the mythical “centre”. In view of recent events I doubt they still think this. A rump of neo-liberal ideologues remain (Trevor Mallard, Clayton Cosgrove, Stuart Nash, along with ‘useful idiots’ like Poto Williams and Kelvin Davis), but their influence is waning. They have been put on notice by a leader who came out of the union movement, and who, as Chris Trotter put it;
      “has spent the last 18 months convincing caucus members of every ideological stripe that disunity is death”
      http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/08/13/dangerous-company-andrew-little-quarantines-the-labour-right/

      The claim that Labour remains “neo-liberal” seems to be coming entirely from supporters of other parties who want to make hay out of left-leaning voters. Particularly NZ First, whose opposition to neo-liberalism is so paper-thin they won’t rule out propping up a NatACT government for another 3 years. Also Mana who, despite some very good policy, have no chance of building the alliances necessary to get to 5% this year (if ever), although I wish Hone well in Te Tai Tokerau (Davis has had it coming since his campaign in 2014 swung the election for the NatACTs). Anyone who thinks a Labour/Green government would be the least bad outcome of this election -certainly preferable to a Labour/ NZ First or National/ NZ First government -needs to stop buying into this spin and challenge those issuing it to back it up with reference to actual policy. Policy, policy, policy!

      “A ‘cleaning of the house’ . I have called it a ‘ purge’ in the past. ‘ Clean house’ sounds so much more …. neutral , perhaps, …. but amounts to one and the same thing.”

      No. It doesn’t. A “purge” is what Stalin did. It involves killing everyone who isn’t loyal to a cult-of-personality leader, or at least sending them off to the salt mines. Packaging up the rump of MPs who think the 1980s were the party’s glory days, and sending them off to the electoral purgatory of ACT where they belong, is not at all the same thing, and cleaning house is a more apt metaphor. I agree with you it needed to be done, but it seems to me it’s been well and truly underway since the membership and the unions elected Cunliffe as leader.

Comments are closed.