Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

42 Comments

  1. This says it all Martyn. Your last sentance rols it all into one tight ball for Jacinda.

    “luckily for us the economic depression alongside the meltdown of the climate crisis will be so deep and damaging that even Cautious Jacinda and Extra Cautious Grant have no choice but to reform and rebuild.- History is watching”.

    We hope for all our sakes Jacinda takes the bull by the horns here.
    Show us what – “transformational” reallly is”

    1. This also says it all, Miss Collins statement about ACT, ” maybe National voters went to ACT because we veered too much to the center ”

      By her own admission.

  2. There is a very strong Maori MP with mana, who imo would make a great deputy PM. She’s been there all the time … Nanaia Mahuta.

    Nanaia knows her stuff. She is respected, a very good speaker, while also having the ability to answer questions with dignity and class.

    1. Yes I agree…and Nanaia Mahuta was a loyal supporter of David Cunliffe ( David Cunliffe, a socialist in the inclusive pro NZ Norm Kirk mould )….so this may rule her out

    2. Indeed, I advocated Nanaia Mahuta a few years back, but as some explained several years ago, she had a child and is possibly in a juggling act. Yet there she is, quietly working away, and would make a good deputy PM. I think its time she should be recognized for her inherent ability’s. It is always a wonder to me, that these woman of the Left, who are instinctively more aligned with the household budget and thus also the national housekeeping , more often times make better leaders than the men.

      It makes one wonder then, whatever on earth happened to the likes of Judith Collins, Ruth Richardson, Jenny Shipley and co?. Even Helen Clarke , I must admit….

  3. Great summary.

    My simplistic suggestions today are…
    1. Fill this nation with state houses and apartments and tiny houses for homeless, all with community gardens and facilities like free Wifi. This will give a lift to skills training, employment, suppliers and producers and within a decade drive out the speculators and overpriced dump renters.

    2. Unite all who can be united to run a massive community organising campaign to make 2023 the year we retire and extinguish neo liberalism for good–Reserve Bank Act, SOEs, State Sector Act, free in and out flow of capital–GONE. Neo liberal traitors in the public service–GONE. WINZ/MSD–GONE with Basic Income payments run by IRD. Transition from industrial scale dairying to horticulture and plant based exports and diet. Restart the Union movement from the base Fair Pay Agreements will provide, restore a class left world view to unions and their members.

  4. I agree Chloe’s a big winner but I think I’d place Jacinda far, far, above Chloe on the winners list. Chloe won a liberal urban electorate seat, Jacinda won the bluest electorates in NZ, destroyed the most efficient political machine that national had became for 15 years and won the largest labour result in about 80 years won Ilam, Timaru wanganui , party vote in Northland, Judith’s electorate, northshore, kaikorua every southland electorate and all but two electorates and won 2023 as well She’s now up there with Savage and Fraser in terms of electoral wins. Politics aside that’s astonishing, nothing that happened on Saturday will go down in the history books quite like that and kudos to the greens for hanging on and increasing their vote astounding. I think a confidence agreement and green environmental ministers to make use of the largest majority climate reforms ever had is a must, we can’t waste this moment and confidence gives them distance to criticize.

    One thing that bugs me a lot is Paddy and Shaw are wrong when they sat it’s the only time it’s ever happened without a deal, Peters won Tauranga without a deal in 96-05, Hyde won Epsom in 2005 without a deal, Anderton won without a deal Dunne didn’t get a deal in 1999 or 02 I wish nz journos knew enough about nz policitical history to correct that falsehood.

    Either way , wow.

  5. Yes , aside from the humourous takes on various groups and attitudes, the fact remains that ‘the neoliberal hegemonic structure’ and ‘ever since Identity Politics over took class politics as the dominant theory’ ,… are the needed changes.

    It really gets back to changing those two things. And until that is done, particularly the former, expect not a lot of change. Full marks , Mr Bradbury. You have analyzed it well. This is not communism, it is not rampant socialism, … it is KEYNESIANISM!!!

    Similar to what we used to have and what the Scandinavians practice now! When we were , in 1968, the 6th wealthiest nation on earth per capita and second only to Denmark !!!

    Under neo liberalism , a few years ago , we were 32nd in the OECD, – behind MEXICO !!! The 36 year old neo liberal experiment, – in which NZ WAS the global Guinea pig,- must end!!! It has created so much poverty and destabilizing of the nation state of NZ it must go. For any who care about their nations sovereignty , it must GO !!!

    For those who support neo liberalism , they must be deemed globalist and anti the STATE of NZ . They must also be deemed to support the homelessness, crushing poverty, the importation of cheap labour from Asia that displaces our own population particularly of our high youth unemployment as the callous cynics that they are. The pollution of our rivers, the sell off of our lands to foreigners,- especially large tracts of land that are strategic and prime ‘ growing lands’, and of our natural resources, to name a few,… these are the things these individuals advocate.

    What is that but rabid globalism justified under the philosophy of neo liberalism?.
    It has nothing to do at all with enhancing NZ , as does the support among them for de unionization and minimum wages , but EVERYTHING TO DO with economic takeover, ‘publicizing’ private losses via corporate welfare ( TTPA ) , creating a working poor wage slave population, in dismantling legislation that protects the working populace all to the benefit of Bill English’s beloved ‘foreign investors’.

    It is all there for everyone to see now. People have had 36 years to see what the elite wealthy have been up to right under our very noses while we pontificated and took SO LONG to act. Evil devours evil. And in time it is exposed for what it is.

    I am glad I party voted Green, and I am overjoyed for them and Chloe Swarbrick . For it seems, the Greens are the leading light – despite some ‘goofiness’ among them , despite many cock ups,- that they are, and such as they are, – still the conscience of this country. Yet even they fall short of the work to be done needed to restore this nations national sovereignty and economic prosperity. The latter being not economic prosperity for any foreign interest , but for the well being, sense of nation hood and economic prosperity that we once enjoyed prior to when Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Roger Douglas , fueled by the Mont Pelerin society, – decided to rip us all off and in particular, – Roger Douglas and the 4th Labour govt starting in 1984.

    I believe our small island nation can do better. We are a great little nation and we are a wonderful , moderate and peaceful peoples. I believe we can expel neo liberalism as the malignant ideology it is. I believe that is a primary to escape globalistic political tentacles, and despite certain sectors offering the excuses that we are ‘a nation wholly dependent on trade’, – that we can do trade on OUR TERMS, – NOT THEIRS. We do not need to sell our souls in order to do this. And still make a good profit.

    We do not need Bill English’s ‘minimum wage economy’, nor do we need to sell off our core assets, nor do we need cheap immigrant labour when we have the wherewithal to train up our own young people to fill those jobs.

    The lazy manipulative and profit greedy motive of the globalist is not needed here. They can go elsewhere. Scandinavia and NZ in the late 1960’s is ample example of what can be done. And what we can also do now in 2020.

    And s a parent, like tens of thousands of others, express this sentiment: OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS AND OUR GRAND CHILDREN DESREVE BETTER!!!

    And for that reason , and that reason alone, I am proud and glad I party voted Green and I was overjoyed to see the dynamic Chloe Swarbrick win Auckland Central. I am also proud and glad Jacinda’s Labour party won in a landslide. I do believe indeed that Swarbrick should be co leader of the Greens. However like Winston Peters of the NZ First party ,… I will not crap all over Marama Davidson or Metiria Turei as those two have been possibly flawed but instrumental in giving us the current Green party of today.

    I would recommend the removal of James Shaw.

    I can see nothing in that man that bolsters up his so called alignment with Green policy. Nothing but timid words and occasional outburst’s. I think he walks far too close to the corporate lines.

    The winners on the night for me were Jacinda Adern and Chloe Swarbrick. And their respective party’s. Now the job is to analyze who they are, what they said, what they did, what they believe in, to work out precisely what it is that people saw in them and why they voted for them.

    And I would suggest this : the rejection, fury and ager against 36 years of a political and economic ideology that only favours the exploitative rich.

  6. Low level socialism? Is that what they are calling center right cold hard capitalism these days?

  7. I’ve always admired John Campbell but his debate and election night presenting was not his greatest. TVNZ in general was pretty hoo hum this election. I’m not sure why Hilary was co-hosting as she seems to have a shallow knowledge of politics and offered little insight. Jack Tame should have had a bigger role. Liam Hehir and Emma Espiner were fine but do we need them on for hours repeating the same talking points? Newshub put more effort into the debates and the tv shows on marijuana and euthanasia, as well as obtaining all the National Party leaks.

    1. Media works are far ahead of TVNZ, they leave them in the dust.
      TV3 on Saturday night made for great viewing indeed.

      Don”t know what Paddy Gower was on, but he was on fire and it showed him in a different light.
      He has a great sense of humour.

      1. I couldnt watch mediaworks. Matthew Hooten and Paul Henry at the same time – where was the balance? Mind, you, for a while it was funny watching Hoots squirming and trying to spin something from it, but yeah nah, I switched to TVNZ after 45 minutes.

      2. Perhaps Paddy was reading the same conclusion from the Party vote results as I do. The anti-cannabis parties got caned by the rural rump . Cannabis Yes vote should exceed 60% IMO.
        His investigation/documentary series was excellent and and he covered a lot of NZ physically and in doing so will have come to understand that consumption and acceptance is endemic in Rural NZ.

  8. I would not write National off, they’re like a cockroach infestation in a tenement slum. You might fumigate most of them out but they’ll be back.

  9. “Mother of Dragons” – GoT reference you use in many of your articles when referring to Jacinda. Hope life doesn’t imitate art since things didn’t work out so well for the tv show version

  10. One of the best suggestions I’ve seen in a long time by a commentator on one of your blogs

    Restrict property investors to new build houses, NOT existing housing stock!

    Should be promoted at every opportunity .This would be a genius move if they would implement it.

    1. Restrict property investors to new build houses, NOT existing housing stock!

      Yes, that jumped out at me too, I think it was Polly T. who first put it out there. It’s so basic.

  11. There’s a good write up on some of Chloe’s immediate goals and concerns, in Stuff today.

    Excerpt:
    The scale of Auckland’s homelessness problem was one reason another of Swarbrick’s key recent meetings was with Auckland City Mission​ chief executive Chris Farrelly​.

    He said Swarbrick had volunteered at the mission without making a big deal about it.
    “She comes into our organisations and quietly volunteers. Not as a photo-op,” Farrelly said.
    “She sits down and listens with these people. Listens to them, listens to their stories.”
    Farrelly said Auckland Central had some of the wealthiest and poorest people in New Zealand.

    “She’s not landing on a parachute here. She’s been on the ground, so to speak. She’s very tuned into the needs of the community.” Chloe, Time for Action on Auckands Homeless

    Chloe also hopes to see more urban farms, such as this one: For the Love of Bees.

  12. Have to agree with your comments on two of the best and worst you pointed out, and both in the same electorate.

    Chloe was awesome. She is really hardworking. I watched some of the debates she was in and you can tell she does her homework, and can articulate this well and with energy and passion. I saw the city mission gave her the thumbs up also, saying she hellps out behind the scenes and out of the limelight.
    Impressive.

    The flipside, Helen White who came across as arrogant and entitled. “I’m a lawyer blah blah blah”, like it’s a selling point, when Parliament is full of them..

  13. “The Wellington Neoliberal Bureaucratic Elite stops transformative change”
    Indeed it does!
    And unfortunately many politicians don’t have adequate bullshit detectors, and don’t realise the relationship they have with senior/muddle management bureaucrats is quite different from the relationship the public have with policy implementation and risk averse public servants anxious to protect their own arses.

    Aaron Smale has just provided us with yet another example (on Newsroom) as has “The Detail”. Funny (not as in funny haha) how many of the protagonists involved are still doing the rounds in the administration – being shuffled from one gig to the next with their taint.
    So too are some of the so-called public servants that thought it perfectly ok to use T&C to spy on the public they’re there to serve, or the ones whose career ambitions take precedence over service – the demographic profilers firmly ensconced at looking at the next opportunity for promotion.
    And then there’s the useless procrastinating rythym politician that gets captured by it all.
    (f-f-f-f-FaFoi, for example, who’s almost been missing in action when it comes to transformation and kindness: 100% interest on payday loans is somehow OK; ummmm-igration; m-m-m-m-media, and his nice bloke mid-life crisis boss before him)
    I think we might be faced with having to wait for them to fuck themselves up, as is often the case, but in the meantime the thing that challenges these masters of the universe most is media scrutiny and the possibility they’ll end up severely embarrassed. (At which time the spin doctors usually trot out various rehearsed platitudes – in this space, going forward).
    Let’s hope Labour get with the programme between now and 2023, or I’ll be breaking the habit of a lifetime of a Labour Party vote

  14. To their credit Labour still campaigned hard even with the likelihood of a solid win they didn’t take it for granted, good on on them. That’s as far as my appreciation for them goes.
    They are no longer the workers party.
    They are the bureaucrats, managerialist party

    I’m wondering if the previously Nat swing vote to Labour is actually more solid than it appears: I’m surmising the female vote for Jacinda was big (appears to be in the stats ive seen), and I’d also bet a big chunk of the wealthy propertied boomer vote also went her way – those all too happy to have their aging lives safeguarded at their children and grandchildren’s expense.

    As such so long as the sacred cow of CGT isn’t slaughtered or similar, these purely selfish individuals will continue to vote Labour.
    Prepare for 3 years of beige platitudes, political correct stupidity and worsening problems.
    Don’t pretend to be surprised.

    1. “To their credit Labour still campaigned hard even with the likelihood of a solid win they didn’t take it for granted, good on on them”
      /agreed. The reason they got my party vote this time round. That and the fact they have quite a few half decent candidates that have the capacity, intelligence and ability to take up the slack from the loafers who’ve caused the 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 Ministers that have held it all together during the past 3 years.
      Sorry to say though this could really be the last dance – unless of course we’ve MISinterpreted, MIS-spoke, MIS-read and Mis understood what Labour professes to stand for.
      As you can see ….. I’m “pivoting” (to use a bit of neoliberalese lingo) while busy trying to figure out how I can do that while going forward in this space – unless of course we subscribe to an ever-increasing space that goes forward, carrying the pivot with it. I should have realised (I probably MIS-thought, or spent too much time worrying about an Honours in Media.)
      Pivot pivot ribbit ribbit

    2. Stupidity got 27 % of the vote. Idiot National supporters still think corrupt practices are still okay in this environment.

          1. Have never voted Nat in my life FYI (value judgement noted) but I’m not arrogant or small minded enough to think them all stupid, however much I might disagree with them.
            I find the best way to highlight what’s wrong is point out the irony (hypocrisy) in someone’s position, a bit like the “kind” lefties thing eh bert.

          2. But your arrogant enough and small minded to take Jacinda,s value of ” being kind to one another” and continue to throw it back in left leaning people’s faces!

            Oh the irony of your own hypocrisy. Eh keepcalm and whatever.

          3. I thought you were educated?
            It’s the left claiming the politics of kindness, not me, do you see the difference?
            It’s pretty obvious.
            Neither is it arrogant to point out a contradiction.
            Hint: disliking something someone says or stands for doesn’t make them stupid or your position correct necessarily.

            Increasingly university fails to produce open minded critical thinkers.

          4. Hint: disliking something someone says or stands for doesn’t make them stupid or your position correct necessarily.

            Perhaps you take good hard look in the mirror for the definition of hypocrisy, clearly, like National you fail to get a grasp of how the country feel . The” Left” you have labelled with a massive generalization but as you say critical thinking eludes you.

          5. We aren’t getting anywhere here are we.
            At least you didn’t threaten to kill me like kindly old mate Jacindafan.
            Small mercies 🙂
            Have a good weekend.

  15. I think a clear line needs to be drawn between owner operators and corporate farms. Federated Farmers are as far from Rural NZ as wall street is from main street.

Comments are closed.