Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

21 Comments

  1. I think it’s a mistake to believe that “communities” exist in any meaningful form – by which I mean a form that is an effective restraint on selfish behaviour that might harm the common interest.

    Market capitalism makes such a thing very difficult to even imagine, let alone implement. If daily economic life is structured as competition for survival, communities are formal entities rather than substantive ones.

    So it’s no surprise that economic drivers mean most farmers are unconcerned about the downstream effects of their actions. What matters more to them, is whether the costs of fixing the problems they cause can be externalised onto current or future taxpayers.

    This is not because farmers are bad people, but because the rules of the game make it economically rational to do what they do.

    1. It’s hard to disagree @ AB. Canterbury dairy farmers don’t meet the criteria for bad people. By the same thinking however we could say that the early sealers and whalers and their enablers = even the early bushmen = were not inherently bad people. Their ignorance of ecological matters – let alone the ethics of it all – was par for the times exacerbated by lack of education. I dont think we can give the same lenience to Canterbury dairy farmers and their enablers. Bad people they may not be but failure to own their actions puts them on the wanted list.

      1. Yes, I think that’s fair enough. Environmental understanding develops over time, and at a certain point destructive actions become indefensible, even if they are understandable.

  2. Farmers spoken today, our Federation Election care, a Party, eradication promise of other rogue trees and other pests, not human.
    How about our water power reforms, what about, jist that, these reforms, in charge of born to rule Minister Watts, eh Bugsy, slouch in our Parliament like a old school, born to rule, Bugsy, behave.

  3. It’s not as if many of us weren’t warning twenty five years ago of exactly these consequences.

  4. Big payouts for dairy farmers! A cooperative to the benefit of all? Nah, another spin on privatizing profits and socializing the costs. And the cost here – well, its water quality… and in the bigger picture social wellbeing as communities struggle to source clean water. Canterbury in particular but lots of other places too it seems. No doubt some dairy farmers are aware of the issues but when the industry has been corporatized to the extent is has been individual voices matter little. Why it is allowed to happen will be something historians look back on in disbelief.

  5. Water. We take it for granted in a land of where it rains a lot – well in some places it does. Where there is variable rainfall water means everything, specially if you’re trying to grow something. The water-hungry dairy industry is in full focus – and for good reasons – but you can look anywhere for how water use impacts on the environment and ultimately on communities. Avocado growing in the far north lowering the water table and causing salinization. And now on the Dargaville coast more intensive avocado growing, this time drawing on a man-made reservoir built in partnership that will deliver for some but with long term implications for all local residents. Water, the forgotten resource. Californians know all too well the importance of water. Australians too. Ask those who live down stream on the Murray River.

Comments are closed.