Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. Economic growth and population growth are, by definition, unsustainable on a finite planet, and there are plenty of indicators that warn us both are about to stall, and then go into reverse.

    Global pollution, on the other hand, tends to be cumulative, and there of plenty of indicators that warn us pollution, especially atmospheric CO2, has passed a critical threshold.

    Therefore, expect present politicians attempting to hold onto their seats and candidates hoping to dislodge them to campaign on increased economic growth, population growth (large or not so large) and further conversion of fossil fuels into life-threatening CO2. This will be so because the entire system is insane, as are those who support it.

    1. Worse still now is this,

      http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-38285300

      Scientists say they are concerned at the rate at which methane in the atmosphere is now rising.

      After a period of relative stagnation in the 2000s, the concentration of the gas has surged.

      Methane (CH4) is a smaller component than carbon dioxide (CO2) but drives a more potent greenhouse effect.

      Researchers warn that efforts to tackle climate change will be undermined unless CH4 is also brought under tighter control.

      “CO2 is still the dominant target for mitigation, for good reason. But we run the risk if we lose sight of methane of offsetting the gains we might make in bringing down levels of carbon dioxide,” said Robert Jackson from Stanford University, US.

      Prof Jackson was speaking ahead of this week’s American Geophysical Union (AGU) meeting in San Francisco where methane trends will be a major point of discussion.

      With colleagues who are part of an initiative called the Global Carbon Project, he has also just authored an editorial in the journal Environmental Research Letters (ERL).

  2. No no no. Here’s what will matter (in my view.)

    1.Poverty in New Zealand. A New Zealand no one expected to see.
    What? Not as bad as Syria? Despair isn’t a competition. We can fix this if we choose to. Historically we always have. are we less compassionate that our parent or grandparents? (Probably we are, but this kind of rhetorical question will not elicit this answer from the complacent who look the other way in the face of long queues for Christmas largesse).

    The Nats are planning to proclaim a doctrine, through this new Ministry, that largely blames the victims. They say that children suffer because their parents are lazy, or addicted, or feckless, or mad, or violent, or all the above. They plan to identify the “at risk” kids before they are statistics. As if no one else need help. Ultimately cheaper, while pandering to the prejudice of their supporters.

    Research refutes this. (Ignore the Dunedin study’s determinist findings. Their sampling is long but narrow, statistically-speaking. The moment you try to identify any classification groups you are dealing with tiny numbers. Not enough for a meaningful conclusion. (It may indicate further study, but from reports they plan to use the tentative finding from this group of 1000 as definitive proof that targeting is appropriate). It is going to be used by the government to justify seizing individual children to prevent abuse before it happens. And thus create the very misery they are trying, wrong-headedly to avoid.) Poor parents are just as motivated to help their children as anyone else. They need to be supported, not judged. No wonder the Maori Party is so opposed.

    2.The second issue should be environmental. The plan to clean up our rivers as a top priority can animate heaps of people who cannot identify with urban misery.

    MMP says every single vote counts, whether in town or the country. In battleground States we saw that with Donald Trump. So it is a full court press on issues related to local population.

    3.Regional Development. Winston got that. Time the rest of us did.
    Regional tax inducements or relocation assistance for businesses to set up or shift has the double whammy of also helping the housing crisis.

    4.Health, wealth and wisdom for everyone. The big picture. For New Zealand to succeed we need EVERYONE. Not just minorities or workers or beneficiaries, or liberals or townies. EVERYONE. It’s time to get our hands out of our pockets and make a difference. We can’t get back to the kinder, gentler time David Lange once orated about, so let’s go forward to a better one. This doesn’t happen by itself. It happens because we dream it, then make it real.

    5.And, last but not least, a focus on our leaders to round them out as real people with 3-dimensional interests, understandings, sympathies and experiences. Smart, committed, communicative, generous, courageous. Be seen with all sorts of people in all sorts of situations. None of this may be in their wheelhouse. So it must become the very heart of their comfort zone. Without this last the rest tois likely sink with barely a ripple.

    (Note: tactically, to characterize Bill English’s efforts as back to the tin-eared failed leader of the nineties will eventually resonate with the Nats on condition that it is both pointed and relentless.)

    (For Paula, I suggest we patronize her like mad. (When she isn’t releasing private information in ad hominum attacks. This shows a nasty streak behind the bumbling incompetence). Suggesting she tries to keep up, but isn’t up to it, endlessly repeated should cover that one.)

  3. NZ has had a guts full of this lousy dictatorship government and next year they will be thrown out as the garbage they are for a cleaner more caring style of administration devoid of the deep corruption that now permeates this current lack lustre administration.

    So 2017 is the year of our salvation folks!

    I can feel it in my old bones!

Comments are closed.