Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Winston’s best intentions will not change the current players in the supermarket structure. We MUST have a third, LOCAL, well backed option if we are to produce fair competition. WW is no better. It’s also of concern that Foodstuffs and the Australian Woolworth’s Group are allowed to bring in so many non-recyclable plastic trays for their meat and bakers’ confectionery while NZ suppliers are required to use numbered recyclable trays! How has this been allowed to happen? I recall Willis twice being so excited about bringing in a third option but was unable to progress on either. Par for the course for this lot!

  2. In theory the current system should deliver the lowest prices. Two large companies should enable economies of scale. They have the size to bargain with suppliers, to centralize an efficient distribution of product and to afford the capital requirements of providing buildings in which to operate. Break them up into smaller entities as Winstone is grand-standing and all you get is everybody paying 4 Square prices and no more Pak ‘n Save pricing.
    If you consider the provision of food to our citizens to be an essential activity in society then it is logical that government should control that. The simplist way would be to determine a reasonable rate of return on the capital invested and then apply a punitive tax on excess profit above that amount.