Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

30 Comments

  1. Fuck non-disclosure sgreements. It only encourages them and others to NOT get the shit sorted. Openness – the Jeyes Fluid for bullshit artists

  2. Option 3 is the best. Tana was never going to win the case and it’s sensible for the Greens to finish off what they started. Option 1 lacks wisdom and option 2 lacks integrity. The Greens value integrity so they will presumably go for option 3.

    1. The Greens shot their intergrity in the foot when they swallowed the dead rat and vited for the bill. They’ve since said ad nauseum that they dont support it its anti democratic etc if they now use it they’ll not be able to criticize the waka jumping law nor call for its removal.

      1. I’m not Green voter, but things change. The Greens value process which is more than the other lot with their sneaky addition on gang patches. Just about everyone including the Law Society say it’s outrageous but the minister is deaf.

    2. Agree. I think they need to decimate the faction that represented the likes of the parakeet they got rid of previously

  3. Dump her now today and then under take a review of the way future candidates are selected .Every political party has had this type of drama in the last 100 years or less .Why even the staunch god bothering national party have been sweeping this type of shit under the carpet for the last few years .

  4. If this photo was taken in Auckland yesterday, who’s she hiding from? It wasn’t that cold.
    Not so loud and proud now? Not so convinced she’s right and can do no wrong.
    Very foolish behaviour from this MP. Should have gone quietly, immediately, and everyone would have forgotten her by now, instead of her thinking she can’t go anywhere without a disguise.

    Let this be a lesson to others who try to pretend they have nothing to hide.
    Go immediately and retain a LITTLE self-respect.
    Some in the present CoC might like to reflect on this. Their time is coming, judging by their cavalier attitude to the law.

  5. ““As we have just received today’s judgment, we will take the appropriate time to take advice and consider next steps.

    “We will have more to say in due course,” Swarbrick said.

    Exactly how much more time or consideration do you need Chloe? She was suspended in March and it is now September. Grow a backbone.

      1. They have had six months to work through the different scenarios. All this has done is say the greens leadership is weak and don’t want to make a hard call

  6. The Green Party put her into parliament; they should live with that decision. What has it to do with parliament if it turns out to have been a bad decision. However her usefulness as an MP has probably ended, so perhaps in order to maintain her dignity she should resign anyway, but only after winning her case (assuming she does so). Staying on beyond that point gives the appearance of only remaining in parliament for the salary

    The difficulty with legislation that allows a party to boot one of its MPs out of parliament is that it may allow the eviction of an MP who has issues with party policy on a matter of principle.

  7. Option 3 and move on.

    And…be more careful with candidate selection in future–as all the other parties have found out over the years.

  8. Dharleen should just vote whichever way the greentards vote thus not distorting proportionality and pocket the pay. She never gonna ever earn 180k a year for doing nothing.

  9. Take option 3, then make an offer to all parties in the house to support a new waka jumping bill whereby all list MP’s should have to leave Parliament when they leave their parties.

  10. “Threats of dirt files aside”…does dear Darleen know where the Greens bodies are buried?

    A woman scorned and all that

Comments are closed.