Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. From someone who has spent a reasonable amount of time in India, I suspect trying to extract any sort of FTA will be like pissing in the wind for a while yet. (I’ve no desire really to go back there in a hurry. while Modi is in power).
    Despite the turmoil between religions (stirred up by the likes of Modi), there’s one thing Indians don’t like:
    their countrymen being treated like shit offshore. NZ has a record of treating various Indian demographic classes like shit, ripping them off, and making life unnecessarily hard for them .

    1. New Zealand trade delegates have been able to capitalise on gentrification, changing demographics that drive prices up, and lacks underwriting of loans that drive prices up. And bubbles that drive prices up. The plan was to gather a harvest and drive down taxes and government spending. Now I’m not good at math but I know that a massive sell off of the agri sector doesn’t equal 20 billion a year.

      Now that we are seeing a reversal in demographics we have to begin the process of shorting or buying puts on any nation that trades with New Zealand. The government can’t do that but our big four banks can. Understand that these are political decisions. Governments can just change the rules instead of marking assets to market prices they can just make up a number so we have to use our own analysts and accountants so instead of the market saying what the value of our exporters are we can tell ourselves with a spreadsheet.

      So someone go buys a farm for a million dollars but it’s only worth 500,000. Then say my spread sheet says it’s worth a million then go get a million dollar loan. We can’t do that, but the banks can do that. So. That will turn our exporters around from collapsing to growing.

      Now these are political decisions that should come with a pay off for the the payer so if it’s negotiated in good faith then a 1% financial transaction tax can be implemented so our banks can go after black swans.

    2. Is that other Indians, or Indians that have recently become NZ citizens, ripping off those people or our ministries?

      1. Probably both. There’s a lot of Paula Bennett style ladder puller uppers out there.
        Those that have ‘become’ NZ citizens justify it (rationalising it in their own minds) by thinking that because they had to suffer, it’s OK to do it to others. In Wellington, Neil and Monty, elsewhere – in Bay of Plenty orchids for example.
        Messrs Treen, McCarten, Kaloti, McClymont and others are well familiar with it all.
        It’s unacceptable whoever does it. Unfortunately our gummint departments and agencies have been enablers

  2. I suspect rumours of China’s economic demise are somewhat premature and exaggerated. Idiots like Peter Zeihan have made a career out of this for over a decade. I’m still waiting.

    If you want a more accurate assessment listen to Michael Hudson.

    1. Maybe it’s easier to blame China’s economic performance than acknowledge the we have helped them on their journey to more self sufficiency

  3. With Evergrande having filed for bankruptcy yesterday and dozens of others set to follow, the Chinese economy is likely to face a cash worth ten times what the GFC was.
    Many Chinese will likely be reduced back to a bowl of rice a day, if they’re lucky: They won’t be in a position to buy our overpriced kiwifruit and baby formula.
    Anyone who thinks this won’t impact us is kidding themselves.

    1. lol, imagine thinking that a serious government that actually doesn’t want an unsustainable property boom is going to be hurt by big developers going out of business and being nationalised.

      It’s a pity you neoliberal freaks are in charge here. We could have affordable housing if we had a serious government.

  4. After the military research ship “Yuan Wang 5” belonging to the People’s Republic of China visited Sri Lanka, India-China relations began to deteriorate beyond repair. Finally, New Delhi accused Beijing of “militarizing the Taiwan Strait”. India, which is currently experiencing border tensions with China and therefore does not interfere much in Taiwan-related issues, made such a statement for the first time and openly criticized China’s military presence in the seas.[1] The most important reason for this is the recent arrival of a Chinese military research ship in Sri Lanka, which poses a direct threat to India’s national security.

    In this incident that took place in July 2022, New Delhi put pressure on Sri Lanka to prevent this visit, which threatened its national interests in the southern seas; But he still couldn’t prevent it. At this point, India has raised its voice against China regarding the security of the Indo-Pacific region, which the USA has long wanted to draw to its side. Because the Chinese ship visiting Sri Lanka is equipped with large radar systems for space research and is thought to have the capacity to monitor India’s military bases. China claimed that the ship in question was conducting scientific research. In short, India suspected that the Chinese ship was monitoring its military bases.

    Similar tension is also experienced in the Ladakh border region. In this context, China agrees to retreat 20 km as a result of negotiations with India after entering 40 km inside the border. As a result, 20 km of land is gained.[2] Feeling surrounded by the Indian Ocean after its northern border, New Delhi felt obliged to warn about the “Chinese threat” in the Indo-Pacific. India would not have made a statement in this direction if it did not concern it closely. However, he had to do this when he saw that the “Chinese threat” had reached the Indian Ocean. The situation in question has been an indication that the India-China rivalry has begun to spread from land to sea.

    In the background of this tension in the seas; The reason lies in India’s failure to express its commitment to the “one China” principle after the tensions over Taiwan. Because India has not confirmed its commitment to this principle before the world public opinion for many years. However, after the visit of US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, many European states, including the G-7 and ASEAN countries, and even the USA, reiterated their commitment to the “one China” principle. Thereupon, Beijing asked New Delhi to reiterate its commitment to the ‘one China’ principle.[3] Beijing expected a statement from India in this direction in the first days of the visit; However, New Delhi remained silent in this process.

    Due to India’s failure to confirm its commitment to the “one China” principle, the Beijing administration has begun to think that the security of its immediate surroundings is under threat. As long as India remained silent on this issue, China looked for “ulterior motives” in it. But New Delhi has many reasons to remain silent. The most important reason for this is the border disputes with China. While the Beijing administration claims rights on Indian territory, for example Aranuchal Pradesh; India should not be expected to support the “one China” principle.

    In short, there is distrust between the two countries regarding respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty. Chinese; If India relinquishes its claims over disputed regions such as Kashmir, Ladakh and Aranuchal Pradesh and gives certain assurances in this regard, in return, India can make peace with China and confirm its commitment to its principles.

    Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said in a statement on August 18, 2022 that relations with China are at an “extremely difficult stage” and that there are “many reasons” for the two countries to work together. ] Responding to the comments in question, the Beijing Government said, “We hope that India will bring the relations to an early conclusion.” He decides to work with us in the same direction to put history on track.” made a statement.[5] Based on these words, India is the side that needs to “correct itself” in bilateral relations. Because in this statement, “I hope they will work in the same direction and cooperate with us.” It is said. However, India claims that it is China that acts aggressively on the border. As a result, there is a trust issue between the two countries arising from the border issue.

    India has a generally reactive approach to China.
    Source : https://www.ankasam.org/is-india-china-rivalry-moving-to-indo-pacific/?lang=en

Comments are closed.