Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Manfred Staab: “….the Māori Experience is essential.”

    It isn’t clear to me how the Maori experience is in-principle different from that of anyone else here.

  2. G’Day D’Esterre,

    Thanks for feedback.

    Perhaps these aspects may help foster understanding of the “Māori experience”?

    https://www.waikatoregion.govt.nz/Community/Your-community/iwi/A-Maori-Perspective-Te-Ao-Maori/Maori-and-the-land/

    “… mission to New Zealand was considered unsuccessful by his employers, the Dutch East India Company, Tasman having found ‘no treasures or matters of great profit’.”
    “The contribution of guns to Māori intertribal warfare, along with European diseases, led to a steep decline in the Māori population during this time.”
    https://www.newzealand.com/us/feature/europeans-arrive-to-aotearoa/

    etc.

    1. Manfred Staab: Thanks for the links, read them. I’m still not seeing what the in-principle difference is between Maori and everyone else.

      1. Thank you for further investigation, D’Esterre.

        ‘A priori’ (knowledge independent from experience) there is no difference between Māori and other ethnic groups.

        > All human species are the same.

        ‘A posteriori’ (knowledge that depends on empirical evidence) there are significant differences.

        > Some human groups established distinct socioeconomic traits and advantages over the others.

        Matters become more complex if (social and economic) class-structure is included in analyses and viewpoints.

        Some Kiwis are reluctant and resistant to get into the nitty-gritty of these terminologies, as it would challenge a few myths as a nation and self-images of the individual.

        (Both terms mentioned above appear in Euclid’s ‘Elements’ but were popularized by Immanuel Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’.)

Comments are closed.