Similar Posts

15 Comments

  1. Re the ignored issues:

    * Mass incarceration rates and a racist prison system only creating more damaged individuals:
    This affects only a few thousand people, who are locked out of sight of voters, and with MSM continuing to report on dramatised crime events and instilling fear into the public’s minds, few voters would care about what goes on in our prisons, that is a sad truth.

    * Suicide rates that are out of control and may be 3 times higher than officials claim:
    Again, this affects only a few hundred people, well a few thousand with relatives and friends affected, and as sad and shocking the situation in NZ is, again, most voters have other things on their minds, have other pressing concerns that are more imminent, so few will go voting on this topic and issue.

    * A toxic culture inside WINZ, CYFS and MoD that denigrates and destroys beneficiaries:
    Now, officially, less than 290,000 persons receive a main benefit, the MSM has sold us the story that they are “all” getting more somehow, that is through the BS investment approach, in support, they got $25 per household a year ago, now get more through an Accommodation Supplement, although it does not come until April 2017 and will lead to reduction in temporary additional support that many on benefits also get. With supposedly high employment, many jobs advertised, supposedly “low” unemployment, and the usual bias being fed by MSM and government, most voters will question whether anything is wrong with WINZ, and whether the odd story about suffering is genuine and representative of the general clientele. The bulk of voters do not give a shit about beneficiaries, they want more into their pockets, and vote accordingly.

    * Catastrophic climate change and how we will adapt to that:
    Climate change is REAL, but is tricky as an issue, it comes very gradually, is hard to detect, and most voters have very subjective perception and judgment, so while some are concerned, many will do nothing, do not consider it a priority for themselves to feel overly concerned with, and vote accordingly. Personal aspirations in a consumerist, neoliberal, competitive and selfish society are ‘priority’, so they look for more income, more into their pockets and the ability to afford stuff, including of course housing, cars and what else they expect. Sadly it is given fuck all attention by the MSM, except when freak weather hits, and so most are under informed and will not vote with this on their minds.

    * An unemployment and under employment rate far higher than officials admit:
    As mentioned above, re WINZ and so, the bulk of voters are employed, have become accustomed to neoliberal, capitalist competitive job market conditions, some know nothing else, and while there is job insecurity in many low paid jobs, the ones that are employed there do not vote in same numbers as the middle class that have more secure jobs. Again, those not getting jobs are often judge as lazy, incompetent, dumb and what else comes to mind, and hence, with the conditioning of past decades, too few will take this as seriously as they should. This will not be a vote changer and election issue at the top, I fear.

    * A speculative property bubble that can’t be tamed:
    That is absolutely true, but as most live and work day to day, like running in a hamster wheel, they see no further than the tip of their noses and live to get to the weekend, which is for a bit of time off, leisure, diy-ing, shopping and sports. Those that have homes are not unhappy about its value, but may gripe about the higher rates (new valuations are in progress here in Auckland). But rates are still manageable for most, and the market is now slowing or stable, at a very high, unaffordable price level. The only ones really concerned are those who wish to enter or climb the property market ladder, and who cannot afford even a deposit. Some have resigned, especially many of the youngest generation, that they will stay longer with mum and dad and be renting for the rest of their lives. But much distraction keeps them away from thinking seriously for the long term. As construction is high and expanding, and as the MSM only report now and then, and in bits on the real size of the problem, the voters will in insufficient high numbers make this the issue it deserves to be. Nevertheless, this is where Labour can really make some headway, by making more aware of the size of the problem.

    * Polluted rivers destroyed by dairy farming:
    Most voters in Kiwiland live in cities, large and small, and few ever see dirty rivers with their own eyes, unless they head out on week-ends and during annual holidays. It is again a serious issue and topic, but a bit away from most voter’s home, as the water from the tap is ok in the vast majority voters’ homes. Dairy is one big earner, still now, and growing again, sadly too many are mindful of the hand that feeds them, without realising other potential and alternatives, so it remains to be seen, whether people vote with this being a priority for them personally. It will concern some, but only 10 to 13 percent vote Green, are thus primarily environmentally concerned.

    * Egregious under investment in infrastructure:
    Another real issue, that is getting worse by the day. This is a topic and issue most can relate to, as it affects them daily, when traveling to and from work, when heading to the malls and so for shopping and other things. The real issue is now credit limitations, that is for Auckland City, the Council, and even developers, as the banks cannot simply hand out money under the present rule set, risking they over over leveraged, so this will constrain development capability, same as labour and materials shortages, which will all drive costs to the sky. The City Rail Link will explode in costs, wait and see, it will be massive, and other projects also. The high immigration continues unabated, and acerbates the problem. We are in real crisis territory here, as we have ever more pressure and demand, and not the money and resources and speed of time to catch up. It grows gradually, and I fear for this election the crisis will not be severe enough for those idiot Nat voters to see they have been led into a mess.

    Some of the issues and challenges NZ Inc faces are related to the last one above, and another one or two, and they are aggravated by high immigration. Certainly in Auckland that must be a major issue for voters that can vote, as we are reaching a situation where we are bursting at the seams and have no way of coping with it. Why is immigration not listed. The MSM does report on it from time to time, but with biased reporters, news readers and the general dumbing down, we get no honest answers and solutions, and voters are not told the whole truth. So only Winston seems to have the guts to address this issue head on, which will give him and NZ First a nice increase in support and votes.

  2. It will be NZ First who decides who gets to govern but I cannot imagine Ron Mark going with any coalition that includes the Greens. He’s just so the opposite of them.

  3. Good review of the current situation Martyn.

    With English meeting Tillerson the Oil baron later this week there now may be some sparks here.

    Tillerson is tied up with the oil discovery using the earthquake producing ship “Amazon Warrior” that destroyed Kaikoura as it was operating there when the earthquake stuck and fled since.

    But now “Amazon Warrior” is off Gisborne/HB and has also caused several earthquakes since and the local anti oil Iwi mob are now demonstrating against it’s presence and the tribes are preparing to leave to go to UN to claim against this ship called “Amazon Warrior”
    destroying the shores and moana of the east coast, so plenty of fires are being lit around this rotten Government now.

    Matter of time mate, so they say “A day in politics is a very long time.”

  4. So Cleangreen….. you are saying that the Amazon Warrior caused the Kaikoura Earthquake? What about the Christchurch quake in 2011 on the same faultline? Was the Amazon Warrior allegedly off Akaroa in 2011?

    Are you smoking what Peter Dunne is trying to legalise? Is that where the Cleangreen pen-name comes from?

    Is this another Chemtrails-caused-the-grassy-knoll conspiracy? Are you another moon-landing denier – should I call you Colin Cleangreen? Do you also believe the Killuminati site that says that the twin towers collapse was a controlled demolition and that the crashed plane could not have fitted the hole in the side of the Pentagon?

    Hmmm. I think you might need to re-consider the Amazon Warrior hypothesis CG – maybe the Amazon Warrior is causing sea level rises and global warming too?

    You sound as deluded and flaky as See-More.

    1. Fundamentalist debunkers who blindly disbelieve in everything but the official narratives, are just as unhelpful as the fundamentalist contrarians who believe in everything but the official narratives. Trust no one. The truth is out there. In a lot of cases it’s on the web, where both flaky conspiracies *and* official narrative can often be debunked.

      Classic example is the pro-1080 claim that NZ uses the vast majority of the world’s 1080 because it only affects mammals. Forest and Bird still have a modified version of this claim on their website:
      ” It is used sparingly in these countries because of the need to protect their native mammals.”
      http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/saving-our-environment/native-plants-and-animals-/protecting-native-forests-1080/1080-frequently-ask

      As the rest of that same page now implicitly admits, this claim was horseshit. 1080 works by interrupting the Krebs cycle in animal cells, and affects any creature that breathes air. Yet for years anti-1080 campaigners were dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” for pointing out that 1080 kills native wildlife as well as introduced mammals.

  5. I so agree with this analysis!

    “Fearing the end of his political career, Peter Dunne is now trying to claim he is a champion for cannabis reform despite making Helen Kelly a criminal for the final months of her life. His meaningless reform agenda however does nothing and if there is a God, he’ll get dumped this election.”

    imo..Phony Peter Dunne has inflicting so much pain on the elderly by his immoral denial of medicinal cannabis and he has shortened the lives of many elderly New Zealanders and others by leaving them to the mercy of dangerous prescribed fatal opioids, he does not deserve to be re-elected!…I hope the policeman Greg O’Connor beats him severely!

    …as for the Greens they look so goddamned cheesy…they look like a bunch of school prats out for a party…who would want to vote for them?…politics is supposed to be a serious business…climate change is also no cause for celebration…lol

    Gareth Morgan looks the real deal….but will a vote for him get over the line and be counted?…same with Mana…but here is to hoping Hone gets the Te Tai Tokerau seat this time without the dirty politics by his adversaries

    Andrew Little has had no effect on Labour’s polls…he is blowing hard but to no effect…. Labour should have stuck with David Cunliffe and the middle aged Labour women for gravitas – Annette King and Nanaia Mahuta and Sue Moroney … these women are serious professional committed politicians with much experience…they are no snowflakes…but they have been demoted, cast aside and lost to the Labour Party and its voters…

    NAct is very aptly described by Martyn Bradbury…

  6. We live in a very safe rural seat, held by National.

    However, in conversations I have had, it seems the mood is to give this current Govt a bloody nose.

    There are a couple of other Parties that rural protest votes could move to, like NZ First and TOP or even Labour.

    And the farming communities usually do ok under Labour.

    1. I’d love to see NZF or TOP peel off a Nat seat or two.

      Ashburton must be feeling the burn right now, what with their water situation? Spots like that might not go for Labour, but they’d probably dig someone like Peters or Morgan.

Comments are closed.