Why would we trust a climate denial Government with RMA changes?

3
271
Orange is the new arsehole

Surprise, surprise…

RMA overhaul puts private property rights first

The coalition Governmentโ€™s sweeping overhaul of the Resource Management Act is focused on the enjoyment of private property rights โ€“ an approach it says will turn New Zealandโ€™s economic outlook around.

Under the new system, Minister for RMA Reform Chris Bishop says nearly half of current consents will be rendered unnecessary โ€“ mostly things that only affect private land, for example balconies and garages โ€“ freeing up billions in compliance costs.

The new system is designed to shift the assumption away from an activity being prohibited, and towards the assumption that it would be permitted. It creates a mechanism by which landowners can recover costs from councils if their private land was held behind environmental protections, and allows ministers to set national limits on human and environmental health.

- Sponsor Promotion -

But critics say the devilโ€™s in the detail, and still have questions about how the two new acts will communicate with each other, how environmental limits will be set, and who has to pay if those limits clash with someoneโ€™s private property rights.

…this is being sold as changes for the ‘kiwi battler’ building a deck without having the Council poke their sticky beak into, but that’s just bullshit, this is about making it far easier for mining, property speculators and polluters to get away with anything they want.

What is most hilarious is that Labour had made it easier for those kiwi battlers in their version of RMA reform

Bernard Hickey point this out

Itโ€™s like deja-vu all over again.

For the second time, the Government has reinvented another legislative wheel that runs local Government and local infrastructure and housing development.

The first reinvented wheel was Three Waters, where the new Government repealed long-deliberated legislation just months after it was legislated by the previous Government, and then replaced it with legislation that looked and felt remarkably similar, apart from a few key details. The big differences between Three Waters and Local Water, Done Well was Nationalโ€™s version of forced separation and amalgamation of water networks and the imposition of user-pays was slightly less forced and does not include the veneer of co-governance with iwi.

Now, the second reinvented wheel is RMA reform. Labour spent six years creating two acts to replace the RMA, only for the Spatial Planning Act and the Natural and Built Environment Act to be repealed in a flurry of pre-Christmas urgency in 2023. Two years later, weโ€™re back where we started with two bills called the Planning Bill and the Natural Environment Bill.

…look.

Of course the RMA needed an overhaul, but this Government is the most climate denial Government in NZ Political history, they have waged a war win the environment and have ben over backwards for the polluters interests and their developer donor mates, so OF COURSE the RMA will be weaponised against community, against environmental law, against Mฤori to sate the thirsts of their big polluter donors!

I don’t trust Chris Bishop as far as I could throw him and I doubt I could lift that dumping!

This will be legislation for their developer pimp mates, it won’t protect the environment or our communities.

There’s a reason they are ramming it through under urgency.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, soย if you value having an independent voice โ€“ please donate here.

3 COMMENTS

  1. The economic system is now grasping at straws. Gone are the days of picking the low lying fruit to achieve growth, now legislation is seen – more than ever – as the means to stimulate both productivity and growth. Optimists and apologists alike will argue we’ll all benefit from the changes, you know, pipeline savings, trickle down, good for all. Many will be winners, big time, others on the wrong end of the legislation will be the losers. Streamlining? Rationalization? Trickle down? Pipeline savings? Call it as you wish. And as MB’s post points out long term the environment is the likely loser, and that means all of us.

    • Desperate to be seen to be doing things on the political stage (To Be or Not to Be, All’s Well that Ends Well, abut could be Love’s Labour Lost) there must be something to push for the wealthy backers to fund their Parties for next election.

      The rich don’t care what happen as long as their dvdends from fu…ing NZ keep up. So cry big tears you people who don’t keep your eye on the ball of politics. Make turning NZs losing streak on its turntable in 2026, point it towards Labour, (lacks verve but not so many underhand passes and ball-biting); let NZ Politics be the team game for 2026. Give up your Olympics or whatever, the Game is Here, now. Make it so!!!!

  2. Not only will the environment be the loser but so will the people who end up buying a property with a shonky garage or deck built on it…

    Luxon, Bishop, Brown, Penk…. Wouldn’t have a practical bone in their collective bodies…that is obvious….wouldn’t have a clue how
    to read a set a plans or which end to
    hold a hammer….

    Just like Brooke Van Velden trying to tell people what is and isn’t safe on a building site or a forestry block….

    Yet another clueless, ignorant, recipe for disaster, minister.

    These ignorant clowns, who naively believe these changes are going to somehow magically make N.Z.
    richer, are an absolute menace to N.Z. society….and when the inevitable death and disasters occur, they should be held accountable and made liable …

    That’s the way the real world operates!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here