Similar Posts

– Advertisement –

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 Comments

  1. For billionaires owning media and shaping narrative is not a loss leader rather a lucrative investment in deregulation and privatisation. And at other times paid protection of status quo.

  2. Billionaire is successful in taking over NZME and large parts of NZ media and funds the growing number of right wing platforms in NZ. Boom! Billionaire 1 : The NZ lefts electoral chances in 2026 0.
    This contest is not about who can make the best Twitter come back unfortunately.

  3. Why would he sink money into a failing business model? Captured click-bait. They’re dying off by the day. Just look at Bob and all the right wing ZB geriatrics on here. Outrage delusion is yesterdays news.

    1. Because he is a parasite class donor and can afford to, the number of halfwits still into NZME/ZB show a specific NZ channel of political influence he can’t resist.

      Richos have so much cash ‘loss leaders’ are part of their operation.

  4. What’s new? – Capitalism has always distorted media perspective. But at least now, with its malign influence freely admitted, we can insist that such media be required to carry a warning, like alcohol and cigarettes, that its content is likely to warp the public’s understanding of the truth.

        1. No but you’re police enough to make a comment. I hope our taxes are used for defamation because we don’t want his type buying and shifting the NZ herald any further right. I can say that and I don’t care.

  5. Gut reaction – sock it to ’em baby. I know this is the reaction one would expect from some unthinking pleb, but I did think hard about it for some minutes after years of study of the situation. So no, plain language and no prevarication, fibbing, paltering!