Review of crippling debts to government now delayed to the Never Never.

19
552

I have complained loud and often about how the last government conducted multiple ‘reviews’ of social policy. Typically, an expensive bureaucratic process was set up, a glossy full colour document produced, and endless rounds of consultations, written submissions, and zooms were conducted with the ever-patient voluntary and poorly resourced NGO sector. The well-paid bureaucrats ticked their boxes, did nothing, and lived another day to set up the next round of exploitative consultation. NGOs and other unpaid participants were left feeling both used and disillusioned. 

Remember for instance, the fiasco of the consultation on the Purposes and Principles of the Social Security Act. This was one of the worst examples, because in 2018 government had already commissioned an expensive Welfare Expert Advisory Group (WEAG) to advise on the critical changes needed to the Act. The rounds of consultation that WEAG conducted exposed the extent of the problem and how lives were damaged.   But their report was basically ignored, and the Ministry of Social Development began its own crusade to maintain the status quo while looking as if it was genuine about reform.

The Purposes and Principles are critical as starting points to any welfare reform. Yet inexplicably in 2007, Labour itself had inserted the current offending amendment to the Social Security Act that stressed self-reliance and paid work. National was delighted with this paving of the way for their reforms. Elected in 2008, they used those principles to justify harsh treatment of welfare beneficiaries.   The depth of relative child and family poverty inevitably increased. 

When Labour was elected in 2017 it should have had a ‘mea culpa’ moment and fixed these principles as a matter of urgency. Social Security should be about making sure that there is income adequacy and poverty prevention, not about forcing paid work as if it is the only worthy source of wellbeing and parenting or caregiving treated as  unworthy.

Six years of messing about and so-called consultation, the Minister came up with this troubling statement  when questioned about the  lack of reform of the purposes and principles just before the 2023 election:  

- Sponsor Promotion -

“ Some people thought that we should have started there with the overhaul, but one of the reasons why we didn’t start with that at the beginning was because, unfortunately, given the nature of some of the policies in the legislation and throughout the welfare system, potentially any revised purpose and principles could have ended up being completely unaligned with the practice and what is happening in the welfare system. So we’ve been doing what we can to overhaul the whole system whilst in the back of our minds knowing we want to get to the point where we can change the purpose and principles in a way where everything aligns.” (Hansard August 2023)

The coalition government has thus been bequeathed a perfectly legal basis again for making paid work the (only) answer to poverty. Compounded by the recession, the result of the work first approach can only be more poverty. 

I won’t even start on the Working for Families (WFF) review. Suffice to say, because if started with the principle that this programme for children was primarily about the paid work of the parents, the needs of children got lost. The review produced multiple redacted documents at huge cost and like all the other reviews was a waste of everyone’s time. But Labour’s election policy on WFF that increased the work-related In Work Tax Credit (IWTC) payment was copied by National showing how both parties were wedded to the paid work principle for income support of children.  

Last week we learnt that the consultative review on debt to government agencies was a total flop too.

Outlined in The Detail Radio NZ: The benefit system that holds the poor in poverty,  Sharon Brettkelly, and Susan Edmunds and Jennie Sim a researcher for a non-governmental organisation called Kore Hiakai (Zero Hunger). explain that

The debt owed by hundreds of thousands of people to government agencies has soared in recent years, but a plan to tackle it has been put on hold.

Figures from Ministry of Social Development show that total debt has climbed by more than $1 billion since 2018 to $2.61 billion in the year to this March, and the number of people with debts has increased by tens of thousands, to 621,541.

Other ministries – including Justice and Inland Revenue – are also owed hundreds of thousands of dollars, though the total overall debt has not been updated since September 2020 when a figure of $3.5 billion was published by Inland Revenue.

I well remember the consultative process on debt.  The NGO sector were experiencing  so many families owing debts to multiple government agencies. When families are unable to pay for basics, the shortfall in budgets must be filled with charity or borrowing every year. Servicing the debt causes the next year’s shortfall to be worse, pushing families into a vortex of unmanageable debt.   

Fairer Future in their excellent report, Lifting the Weight, describes how individuals and families are affected by MSD (Ministry of Social Development)  debt. CPAG outlines how WFF debts to Inland Revenue have doubled since 2018.  Then on top, many families are also repaying hefty student loans and Justice Department reparations and fines.

When last year a review of the overall debt to government agencies was announced, NGOs prepared submissions in the belief that the outcome of the review would result in policies to restore some fairness and sanity.  

But the IRD, MSD and other agencies saw their task as a high-level ‘framework’ discussion. In a two hour zoom, I asked what the outcome would be for the NGOs present who cared so passionately about getting attention to this issue. We were told there would a Cabinet paper in June (2023) and if, and only if, government approved, we would see it.  Thanks, and no thanks.  

The Detail goes on to note the high level framework was finally adopted:

“That framework was adopted by the government in July last year with the aim of improving “fairness and consistency of how people are treated across government agencies, to put more emphasis on debt prevention in policy design and ensure people get appropriate relief if they’re in hardship”.

This month, a year on, we learn of a report back to Cabinet to assess “whether the framework has been effective.” But Inland Revenue told The Detail that this report will now not go ahead. “Instead, the framework is scheduled to be evaluated in 2026.”

So, we had a time-wasting consultation during 2023 that was not focussed on the urgent need to tackle the never-ending accumulation of debt affecting so many families. A framework paper was then produced mid-2023, and now we hear there was another report to evaluate the framework paper due this month (a year later).  But even that ‘make work’ report will not go ahead until 2026.

If I was Martyn, I’d be swearing big time at this point. WTF? 2026? Election year? 

We can expect no attention to this critical issue in the foreseeable future. Meanwhile the acute needs of families suffocating under the debt load are ignored in typical Tory fashion.

  



19 COMMENTS

  1. The over 1 billion debt ” owed ‘ by beneficiaries should be be cancelled wiped clean as per that ancient social balancing for a healthy society the ” Jubilee ” We are a greedy debt enforcement society. All part of the Neoliberal brain damaged head fuck our governments slave to.

    • Thanks jay11 for Jubilee suggestion. We don’t need another review we need workable policies to fix the debt burden before it buries us all.
      Here is another one– Government pay the annual student loan payments for all who stay and work the full year NZ.

  2. The various shambles of clusters of psychopaths we think of as various gubbimints are corrupt. All of them. Our IRD is corrupt. All of it. WINZ is corrupt and rotten to the core. Our four main banksters, ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac are corrupt.
    14 multi-billionaires, 3118 multi-millionaires each with a base line of $50 million net and four now Australian owned banks stealing away with $180.00 net a second 24/7/365 while there is poverty here, people living rough and our farmers are drowning in debt to their Australian masters and competitors. And all while we hide in the shame while they gaslight us with.
    It’s no longer a matter of identifying what’s wrong. We know what’s wrong. What we must do now is work out what to do about it. Should we stop giving our money to rich Kiwi individuals and foreign owned banks? Do you think that might work?
    The above took me about 15 minutes to write. That’s $162,000.00 dollars after tax gone to Australia via its banks digestive tracts along with some of our best people. How does that make you feel? Proud? Happy? Thankfull that the politicians we pay are doing their very best by us and for us? While they make us feel guilty for going off the rails.
    We Kiwi’s need to take our country back off the neo-liberal scum who stole it three decades ago. roger douglas should spend his remaining days in prison and our hyper riche need to be cash and asset stripped as do the four now foreign owned banks and that money should be redistributed throughout those living in poverty first.
    Let’s try a little trickle-up roger? What do you reckon?

  3. It seems to me that we have public servants & consultants with very high pay rates who recommend continued research into different aspects of poverty with the main aim being to enrich themself & no thought about actually improving things for those in poverty.

    • Sadly, after years of this I have come to the same conclusion. The worst part is taking the unpaid time of the people who are actually on the ground helping those affected and seeing the damage caused. They may be well intentioned, but they don’t see the bigger costs of their reviews and the damage when they go nowhere

      • Often these reviews bring nothing concrete, it may talk problems and not solutions. If there are solutions, that may be too challenging or unpalatable to the audience. Hence, after spending millions on reviews, nothing change.

        • Sadly true Benny – see it repeated over the decades. Going through the motions. But are we gradually seizing up as time goes by. Got to keep going as Susan St John does. It’s a hard world if you want to apply known effective social science aimed at assisting society as a whole. That doesn’t please the always disguised class consciousness in the ambitious.

        • Thanks for comments. We have seen that the govt will reverse bad policy ( eg cancer drugs). if outcry strong enough. It is going to be exhausting to opposed on each issue. And we must encourage Labour to do better

  4. No payments of debt to W and I by those on a main benefit.

    Where when are children re-finance private debt* (credit cards, car, other consumer debt) and ensure a cash (bank account) reserve. This enables easier payment of rent and the like, on loss of employment or partners. And then work with charity groups to develop their involvement in providing interest free debt.

  5. The people on the ground – the NGOs etc are actually doing a modern government’s work yet often being treated like immigrant labour here, too often not well treated; no or poor wages, long hours, often no homes, hard to find remedies for this. The charity or help group may be cancelled peremptorily after a few years whether showing good or minor outcomes.

    People don’t realise how this theme plays out throughout NZ/AO. And I repeat a few lines from a book about how Hitler rose to power in Germany . From The Death of Democracy by Benjamin Carter Hett : Few Germans could imagine [the war’s outcomes]. It is hard to blame them for not foreseeing the unthinkable. Yet their innocence failed them, and they were catastrophically wrong about their future. We who come later have one advantage over them: we have their example before us.

    The same words apply to us as did the 1930s Germans. But we have not seen the comparison and never will; we don’t have enough intellectual depth in our education and home lives have little philosophical input, it’s all get up and go physicality without much contemplation, questioning, trying for an understanding of anything.

    We are in a different mindset than in the 20th century, and it seems that there is no way back. It is as if the welfare state had been a fashion, now passe’. So there has to be thought on how to achieve a modicum of decent compassion and inclusion in a balanced society and its comforts and services for the increasingly impoverished. Which will grow with the tanks of tech and AI etc. squeezing us out like toothpaste!

  6. Furthermore,
    so much of this debt can be generated by the decreasing competence of the government agency staff.
    I worked 7 months in the W&I call centre in 2007. I have had periodic engagement with them over the intervening years, a few main benefits for a year, mostly non-beneficiary accommodation supplement.

    First the ethos of the Clark regime staff “making sure everyone got their full and correct entitlement”, has withered away. Second, the impoverished pay rate paid to W&I frontline staff, and huge stress has seen competent and expert staff wither away. This year I made the mistake of using jobseeker while working casually, just in case y income dropped too far – it did not. But every contact with them was a disaster of screw ups. Including a large chunk of debt that was not my fault, their internal systems.
    Fortunately I knew the system well enough to push and push, get the debt cleared and so forth. That is not the same for the average kiwi.
    The same goes for ACC and IRD. Competence has dropped, secrecy and non-communication has increased, and it is almost impossible to speak to a person with discretion and authority. Just as the onset and sunset of call centres has seen a collapse in service and responsiveness, It will only get worse with AI calling the shots.

    Write off the debt, have all kiwis entitled to a yearly tax credit or pay at the level of the main benefit, and be done with most of the ministry. Get back to helping NZers in need.

  7. Thanyou Paul for these great insights. You are so right. There needs to be loud demands for proper reform and debt write offs immediately. Repairing balance sheets will require deliberative sustained policies.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here