In it for you (as long as ‘you’ are a property speculator, Banks or mega wealthy’)

33
1669
New Labour Party slogan

Chippy has launched Labour’s slogan, ‘In it for you’, which is only true if the ‘you’ is a property speculator, Bank or the mega wealthy’.

They’ve moved from the collective ‘Let’s’ to the individual ‘you’.

The ramifications of Chippy’s ‘Captains Call’ can’t be felt all the way in Lithuania but he’s going to get some on his return.

Ginny Anderson claims Chippy ‘read the room ‘, oh really Ginny, and what fucking room was that love? A room full of Landlords?

Let’s remind ourselves what we could have gained here

- Sponsor Promotion -

The beauty of all this is that Chippy’s call will hold the timid middle while empowering The Māori Party.

The Greens are just too weak and feckless and we all know it, John Tamihere on the other hand is a working class bover boy who plays to win and in any post negotiation Chippy will be given the following ultimatum – either give us our wealth tax or go back to the Polls, a second election that will destroy whatever is left of the Labour Party.

Chippy can say what he likes while Labour have an MMP majority, once he doesn’t have that majority, he don’t have jack shit.

A Labour/Green minority Government with supply and confidence from the Māori Party is still the win I’m expecting post election.

This is where real power will come to play, this is where real change for the poorest NZers will be had, when JT enters that room with Chippy, Grant, David Parker and Willie Jackson, he will be coming to force that change.

John Tamihere’s Māori Party is the only hope for the poorest Kiwis.

As for the Greens, they’ll get what they are given and consider themselves lucky.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

33 COMMENTS

  1. “In it for you” *

    * definition of “you”:
    Transgender Maori vegan cyclist members of the Wellington bureaucracy.

  2. Chippy folds like a deckchair and Labour voters look as nervous as a long-tailed-cat in a room full of rocking-chairs.

  3. J.T. and Chippy vs. Mr. Potato-Head. It’s the Bondi Party vs. the Brisbane Party, because that’s where all their demoralised voters are desperately trying to escape to!

  4. ‘ in it for myself ‘more likely.

    In it for Mallard, in it for Nashy , in it for Mike Woods shares, in it for the professional high earning managerial class, in it for the kitchen cabinet.

  5. In it for you. Really? They seem to be in it completely for themselves.

    Did no “clever” PR person tell them how easily ift will be to mock them for this?

    • No because they are all ‘mind blind’ (usually describes some people on the spectrum, who can only see – one side of an argument ie: there is no nuance).

  6. In it for you (as long as ‘you’ are a property speculator, Banks or mega wealthy’)

    Got it in it for you. (For the rest of us)

    Is Chris Hipkins deliberately trying to throw the election?

  7. “either give us our wealth tax or go back to the Polls, a second election that will destroy whatever is left of the Labour Party.”

    That’s a vote winner, but not for Labour. Everyone knows the wealth they’ll target is the low hanging fruit of the struggling middle class, not the extremely rich.

  8. Ginny Andersen says Chris Hipkins “read the room”.

    Talk about sychophantic horseshit divorced from the reality.

    If Chris Hipkins had read the room, he would have realised, people are hurting, and they are angry.

    The angry vote will be gathered up by the Right and even Far Right, Cue the rise of Act and even NZ First.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/132532167/can-winston-peters-ride-a-freedom-wave-to-parliament

    ….Peters was asked about censorship of people who dispute climate change; the WEF; the “propaganda” of the mainstream media; vaccine mandates; what a woman is; how to “bring democratic society back”.
    He was asked traditional questions at this campaign event, too – about the cost of living, coalition agreements, and crime. These core issues were the main subject of his speech and were consistent with New Zealand First’s policies. But compared to previous meetings, they were fewer: Some in the audience had other issues on their minds.
    In the early stages of his 17th general election campaign, Winston Peters has drawn growing interest from the self-proclaimed “freedom” movement.
    These are people with views that range from rejecting Covid-19 vaccines, dismissing the scientific consensus of climate change, and emphasising what they believe to be the sinister influence of global institutions like the WEF and the WHO….

    If this stupidity continues, Labour there can be little chance that Labour can win the election.

    Chippy and Labour are delivering us up to the most frightening Right Wing National/Act coalition government in a generation, if not ever..

    Be afraid, be very afraid.

    • Pat+O’Dea. Andersen’s ‘Hipkins read the room’ statement was either a blatant gob-smacking lie, or evidence of the pair of them being totally deluded. It was also dumb, patronising, insulting poppycock from yet another brain-frozen fool. If Hipkins read any room, it was an empty one.

      Andersen was using jargonese the way that all these cliched fools do, thinking they impress the punters just because they impress each other.

      “In it for you” sounds rather like “ We’ve got it in for you,”. We know that. We’ve known it since Ardern. We know that the Ardern government wasn’t gutless, or lacking in courage, but that she knew exactly what she was doing, just like cutie sausage-roll boy knows what he’s doing, within the limitations of his own ruthless grey matter.

      Winston Peters has announced his intention of addressing the genderID agenda with its transgender ideology which is being promulgated in the school system as science, when it most certainly is not, and which is confusing and damaging vulnerable children under this government’s watch.

      Yes, they are trying to curb freedom of speech, and not just for nutters, for everybody, and Ardern and Hipkins may see Klaus as Father Christmas which he most certainly is not, and they brutally kneecapped the independent Commissioner for Children, but Peters being the only politically significant person discomforted about the damaging sexualisation of children in the New Zealand state school system is good reason to vote for him and to jettison Labour with their peculiar priorities. Damaging kids while simultaneously depriving them of all sorts of basics and essentials is indefensible, and the alternatives may be worse, but this is all down to dodgy Labour and the useless Greens.

  9. Greg Presland. AKA Mickey Savage, is whimpering like a beaten dog about the coming change of government.

    https://thestandard.org.nz/why-a-change-of-government-would-be-a-bad-thing-school-lunches/

    Why a change of Government would be a bad thing – school lunches
    By: MICKYSAVAGE – Date published:12:14 pm, July 14th, 2023 – 59 comments
    Categories: chris hipkins, david seymour, Economy, education, politicans, poverty, tax – Tags:

    Good hearted Labour Party liberals like Greg Presland whimpering about the negative effects the coming change of government will have, but won’t attack the policy direction of his current government that are making this change of government inevitable.

Comments are closed.