Budget 2023: Government’s early childhood policy comes under even more fire from educators
The Government’s Budget centrepiece is still being slammed by the early childhood sector, with 90 percent of the industry now telling the Government its 20 hours free care for two-year-olds is unworkable.
At the centre of the Gender Pay Gap is the biological reality women carry the babies. If we as a liberal progressive society want to ensure everyone has equal agency, then surely recognising biological reality is a starting point?
The first 12months should be maternity leave – or paternity leave, either one, but one of the parents should be paid to stay home with the infant for its first year of life. Who else do you want to look after an infant other than the parent?
Meanwhile, ECE should be nationalised and made completely free for 2 year olds to 5 year olds while all after school care should be free.
Childcare costs fall unevenly and unfairly on women, so why not eliminate those costs altogether?
Playing the Gender Pay Gap Game even when implemented, doesn’t lead to the outcomes desired.
If women having babies is stunting their pay careers, then subside the cost of having that kid with 12months maternity/paternity leave, Nationalise ECE and free after school care.
Also implement a 4 day working week for all state employees so that people’s quality of life is lifted rather than just wage growth.
The promise of Democracy is you can look in your kids face and know they will have a netter deal of it than you.
Allowing a parent to stay home with their kid for a year, provide free early education care and free after school care would do more to live up to that promise than anything else.
We need to start fighting for tomorrow because none of the politicians are.
All we need to do to fund this type of universal upgrade of the social infrastructure is tax the rich!
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media
Nationalise ECE, and it can perform as well as the polytechnic mega entity.
And the Education Ministry is another example of how well the state does when it is the centralised provider.
Why not nationalise taxis and restaurants as well, because those are essential and but not always available….
I though they gave…
the faulty fashionable theories currently in practice do not invalidate the concept ada
Well the State is doing such a great job of organization of the polytechnics why not let them stuff up the other end of the spectrum
That assumes that Polytechnics was producing enough carpenters, electricians and plumbers in the first place. What happened there oh great master of the armchiar economical greatness community?
Superb Sam.
Perfect
Privatised rest homes and trades training were also a disaster, when no such issues existed in the past. The whole lot should be folded back into the government departments, along with daycare nurseries, kindergarten-level crèches and after-school programmes.
Turning the technical colleges into one giant state enterprise is surely a preparation for privatisation, and so to the water board fiasco.
Not sure the aged care sector was ever outside of the charitable sector.
And faith in government-run care facilities needs to be balanced against what we know happened in borstals and mental health facilites like Lake Alice.
@Ada: In 1885, the government set up the national system of provincial Charitable Aid Boards, part of the wider Hospital Board system. These were funded by both council rates and general taxation — and in areas where no parish institutions for the elderly existed, the Board would build rest homes.
These included Otago Benevolent Institution Asylum (Refuge Wing, Caversham), Queen Jubilee Memorial Home (Woolston), Lorne Farm Home (formerly Invercargill Refuge Home), and the Waipukerau Asylum (formerly Napier Asylum, Hospital Hill).
because they can’t do any worse than the private sector TREV it’s a prime example of why private business can’t organise a piss up in a brewery
It is private business that employs a vast proportion of the working people .They make money to pay wages ,taxes , compliance costs , and shareholders they range from corner dairies with 2 or 3 staff to global businesses that export our goods. Dispite your claim there are many successful breweris and our wine takes prizes for its quality even in Europe . The airline run by Luxon has won top place many times which will hopefully carry over to this country after October. There will be plenty of piss ups to organise on that day .Perhaps you can show us all how you would do it
The age of two does not come under Early Childhood Education. You should do your research first.
Change it to baby care. Another complete arrogant point of view which changes early childhood employment terms with the keyboard banging.
It wouldn’t be a problem if the women with babies (can we even say that these days? LOL) had good working husbands to look after them.
Because that’s how society used to function before DPB.
@Andrew:— Of course this is a canard, because breadwinners were paying for every mother to be a homemaker at that time. Every mother was “being subsidised”, but nobody was complaining about that. The Arbitration Court set the minimum wage to the level required for two adults and three children “in a civilised community”, and the Award System ensured people soon earned more than that.
It is even more misleading when you consider the Full Employment Policy. The earliest children of the Windrush Generation went straight into daycare, because employment was so high that all the West Indian mothers were out working — well before most other homemakers were pushed into the workforce.
Andrew. No, the pre-DPB situation for single mothers, was horrendous and barbaric, and even women with ‘ good working husbands’ did not necessarily fare well at the hands, and many still do not.
But considering the dreadful capture of the Department of Education by the socially and psychologically destructive gender ID ideological cult, and the sexualisation of young school children, I think it would be madness to nationalise ECE and entrust it to this type of damaging government agency.
The Labour government does not like children, and this may have its genesis with Helen Clark, whose recorded negative attitude towards children and towards motherhood, was, IMO, ignorant, misguided, and pathological. The shocking abolition of the Commissioner for Children may be an inevitable result of Clark’s seeming antipathy to children who she seemed, IMO, to regard as vermin, and Clark herself was a bigger control freak than Rob Muldoon, IMO, and her influence within the party, considerable.
Unfortunately ECE is also very much a commercial enterprise nowadays, and apparently being bought into by one particular immigrant group with varying outcomes, so the answers are not clear. The ideal, of course, is a nurturing home environment with a parent caring for kiddies, and another parent bringing home the bacon. It can be done, and it can be a pleasurable experience, but alternatives still need to be available, and so do the economic circumstances to make home care a practical reality.
One thing is clear though, and that is that the low wage economy of neoliberalism only benefits the “haves” and this is what needs to be changed. It may take a biffing-out of both mainstream political parties to achieve the just and free society which we owe all its participants, and especially the vulnerable.
Agree best day care is with House Husband or Housewife. Kindy’s are over crowded he’ll holes. With some awful owner, who hates kids
trying to make money from babies.
True but more often caring people who respond to regulations and increase the cost to provide the service required or reluctantly withdraw their services.
Kindergarten is not over crowded as they must stick to ratio and they are not privately owned and all teachers are fully or provisionally qualified. However, many private owned who are not with fully or provisionally qualified ece teachers may just go for numbers and crap carers for profit.
Incorrect labelling with ignorance sorry.
Everything needs nationalising.
Tax the rich
Nationalise wealth.
What would you do with Playcentre?
Is there anything the Far Left don’t want the State to nationalise? All part of the “I don’t want communism, just well-regulated capitalism” schtick.
if only we could nationalise right wing bots acies, what’s up starting to realise private enterprise has fucked up so badly that many NZers now consider nationalisation an option??? is that your problem? that business has royally fucked up…trains and ferries for 2 lack of investment and profit taking ensures chaos
… trains and ferries for 2 lack of investment and profit taking ensures chaos
This may come as a surprise to you (I imagine many things do), but the trains have been owned by government now for some fifteen years, almost six of them under Labour, so if there’s still a “lack of investment” that’s on your side.
Now I know you loath this “neoliberal” Labour Party, but actually neither they nor – regrettably – National, have skimped on ploughing money into rail. What they’ve been willing to accept is that the damned thing is not fit for purpose in 21st century NZ and that no matter how much money you spent, it wouldn’t make more people want to use it and it would still be useless.
Rather like all the money ploughed into Public Health and Public Education, the failures of which are increasingly seeing private options being taken, so thanks for that.
Still, I get that commies have always loved trains. All that central command and control.
I think a ‘netter’ deal is the new word for today. It means that on the whole things will be better even if there are some small annoying things that detract from the gains. Can we please have more netter deals gummint?
Do something positive for everyone, let’s not have racism, reverse racism etc. – just sexism now and then ie better situations for mothers or fathers to do their job and workshops to help them do that. Perhaps regular block courses for skills required in the workplace, with excellent kid-care alongside in an adjacent classroom or playpen. Talk about getting two flowers to grow from a withered plant! What a good idea I have had. Let’s do it – oh it;’s already been done? Well start again and keep on doing it – not just a wee pilot to go on someone’s CV as having run one successful new course. Longevity, not throw away courses like throw away clothes, shoes – people?
Grey Warbler. “ … excellent kid-care alongside…” Lane Walker Rudkin, then a high quality clothing manufacturer in Christchurch, established the first on site crèche for its working mothers, mainly machinists, back in the late 1950’s I think. Consequently they had no difficulty getting and keeping staff. Mothers had peace of mind knowing their babies and toddlers were nearby and they could check on them, breast feed, interact in their downtime. Lane Walker Rudkin was later bought out, became something else, and I gather that the crèche went. Today much of their product- type is crap made by slave labour in Asia and guaranteed not to last.
There’s no reason why eg government departments could not provide similar, including for the large number of public servants who pour into Wellington each day by train, and whose domestic routines are disrupted every time that the train services are, which is frequently. The biggest number of out-calls on workplace phone lines used to be made by parents checking on children and each other, but they probably text now.
Unfortunately, the well-being of children is not a priority for this government any more than having a healthy and stable society is, as evidenced by their disestablishing the Commissioner for Children and underfunding just about everything necessary to help the children of the poor.
Mothercraft used to be taught in girls’ schools, as part of homecraft or domestic science, but that all got tossed out, possibly for perpetuating gender stereotypes, and as usual, the children were the ones who missed out. With no Commissioner, and an effete Minister, the government cannot claim to care about children.
Comments are closed.