Oranga Tamariki & the art of waving dead brown babies in our face

17
1065

When Stuff did their mea culpa to the way they had covered Maori as a clickbait, one way they covered dead Maori babies was noted. Despite waaaaaaaay more Pakeha babies dying at the hands of white parents, Stuff (and many other mainstream media) would amplify the dead brown babies and give graphic details of the deprivation they suffered where as white parents who killed were given empathy and sympathy.

It is to this turid time, 2007 to 2015 that we need to look at to understand why Oranga Tamariki is the basket case it is, and it’s to do with the art of waving dead brown babies in our faces and how easily we all capitulated.

Two things happened between 2007 and 2015 which built the blue print for Oranga Tamariki.

The first was a public outrage campaign run by the Sensible Sentencing Lynch Mob and their right wing mouthpieces who repeatedly used the deaths of brown babies and all the accompanying damage of their lives as an immediate reason for something to be done.

(I still laugh thinking about Jeremy Wells turning up at a Christine Rankin silent vigil in 2007 while Wells was on the opposite side of the road screaming into a cell phone that he couldn’t hear the silent vigil.)

- Sponsor Promotion -

Despite more white parents killing their kids, the babies waved in our faces had to be brown to get the right level of white anger to give the State extraordinary powers.

While the campaign of denigration played out, Bill English’s new experiment in welfare saw an opportunity.

His big data investment model argued that if CYFS uplifted children early it would save the State money downstream and using big data would make this more efficient.

Let’s be very clear, the mutation that Oranga Tamariki mutated into has at its heart the welfare of the State, NOT the vulnerable child. This is and has always been a cost saving measure and if you don’t understand that you don’t understand the problem.

In 2015 Anne Tolley held up damaging statistics showing hundreds of kids abused by the State and concluded there was more chance of a child being hurt in State care than left in the community!

Rather than use these shocking stats to demand more funding, Tolley renamed CYFs for the 18th time into an organization called Oranga Tamariki and using all those dead brown babies as the justification, removed parental legal powers, dumped the research units that found Maori homes, streamlined the 0800 numbers into immediate investigation units using little more than rumour and removed accused parents of gaining legal aid to defend charges.

This was all done to maximise the big data investment model, removing children from damaged families at birth was where the financial pay off was so National weaponised uplifts.

Oranga Tamariki was always a neoliberal welfare experiment using manufactured white outrage at dead brown babies to manifest an Agency drunk on its own power.

It wasn’t until Newsroom exposed what Oranga Tamariki was doing that it started to unravel. Suddenly having Political masters who cared about this threw OT into a panic and created a knee jerk critical race theory response where OT stopped uplifting Maori babies and started taking Maori kids off white step parents they had already placed.

Until Bill English’s funding model is dismantled, until we start funding this directly and appropriately, we will continue to fail these children in a land of plenty.

You all allowed the media’s shaking of dead brown babies in our faces to justify something must be done and never bothered to check the thing National did.

The horror of Oranga Tamariki is all on you and your ease to be manipulated.

 

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

17 COMMENTS

  1. I generally agree with you Martyn but I am kind of wondering where this statement came from – “Despite waaaaaaaay more Pakeha babies dying at the hands of white parents,”.

    I agree that there was iittle reporting of pakeha child abuse during this period but is the above statement really true? Or is it a case that there were higher numbers of Pakeha with kids than Maori because of the disparity between being up to 87% other with at that time about 13%? of Maori. Today the numbers in care are predominantly Maori AFAIK and you are saying that this is because of bias and flawed government policies and you may well be right. Or it may partly be that now there are more Maori youngsters relative to white youngsters.

    You are corrrect about the communal horror we all felt over Nia Glassie and the Kahui twins and how that may have created a backlash particularly from a National government. The conspiracy of silence over the Kahui twins especially generated a strong feeling of frustration that their were those in Maoridom that just werent ever going to be held accountable for their actions. So it did a lot of damage. The media didnt help but the lack of justice for those babies still rankles today.

    Appointing Paula Rebstock as Chair to the Cyfs review (which ended up recommending the uplift of children at birth) was always likely to have a Neo Liberal bent. She is an economist, and right of centre and a very practical person who would have looked for a solution that would keep the children the most safe in a operationally effective way. If we are looking to lay blame, it may be in the Terms of Reference of the enquiry, possibly the Review was told that the Safety of the Child was its paramount concern and in this respect, uplifts at birth are the most safe thing that can be done.

    So I guess what I am saying is, that this whole CYFs debacle has complex roots and that no government of over the last 20 years, seems to have found a way to make it work optimally for kids. Maybe the new iteration will succeed were others failed but I wouldnt hold my breath. As long as there are people who abuse their kids, OT will always be the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff as well as a political football.

  2. MB.
    When you say “you”, to whom are you referring?!!? Just sounds like another psychotic rant. You obviously have issues busting out through any channel you can lay your hands on. I suggest iou seek help.

  3. MB.
    When you say “you”, to whom are you referring?!!? Just sounds like another psychotic rant. You obviously have issues busting out through any channel you can lay your hands on. I suggest you seek help.

Comments are closed.