Drug bust was a huge coup – but the surveillance should trouble free citizens
This latest huge bust, in a never-ending series of huge busts, is being touted as a coup in the War on Drugs, begun by Richard Nixon in 1971 – and indeed it is. This is Graham Greene level skullduggery by the boys and girls in blue. Congratulations to all involved.
But… wait.
Let’s stop and consider this. As a citizen of a free country it is my expectation that the state is not going to be listening to my communications without first convincing a judge that there is probable cause to be doing so.
Fireworks aficionado, poster boy for redemption and Libertarian stuntman, Damien Grant, fears a police state, and he should!
Every month there’s a new revelation that the NZ Police are abusing their power.
Last month Northland Police were caught illegally using drink-drive checkpoints to gather intelligence. The cops response was ‘oops’.
The month before that they were caught illegally taking photos of Māori teenagers.
In April their bullshit ‘formal warnings’ system also turned out to be a secret intelligence network…
A judge has ruled that police ‘formal warnings’ are illegal and akin to a conviction without trial
The police practice of issuing “formal warnings” to people who haven’t been convicted of any crime – and sharing that information with other parties – has been found to be illegal.
In a ruling that could change the way police officers do their job, High Court Judge Paul Davison found that the warnings – issued 20,000 times in the past 10 years – had no basis in statutory or common law and were a breach of the Bill of Rights Act.
Warren Pyke, the lawyer who sought the judicial review for a client who had been issued with one of the warnings, said most people would have no idea that such information was kept and shared.
…so that’s 3 off the record intelligence networks that have all been uncovered in the last 3 months.
Māori youth are targeted and identified illegally on the street and that data kept on an off the record real time system.
Drink-Drive check points are for drink diving NOT for illegal intel gathering!
And ‘formal warning’s have been used as a massive treasure trove of information.
Every single time they get caught, their response is ‘oooops’.
So why on earth would we give the Police enormous omnipotent Eye of Mordor powers with their mass surveillance face recognition tech?
Right now, the NZ Police are using mass surveillance facial recognition software from an Orwellian company that illegally sources photos without any sign off from the Privacy Commissioner or their own Police Boss!
The Police then held a ‘stocktake’ of these types of unapproved face recognition software trials and lo and fucking behold the Police quietly admit to a $9million face recognition network they are setting up with zero oversight from the Privacy Commissioner???
Police setting up $9m facial recognition system which can identify people from CCTV feed
Police have been quietly setting up a $9 million facial recognition system that can take a live feed from CCTV cameras and identify people from it.
This would push New Zealand into new territory for tracking citizens.
It will be run by a non-police contractor – US firm Dataworks Plus – and collect 15,000 facial images a year, with that expected to expand up to 10-fold.
Their latest move is to create some fake watchdog panel over mass surveillance powers that no on gave them!
Let’s not forget their sudden surge of warrantless searches…
…on top of this enormous state surveillance power, there is a constant push from the Maori Party and the SIS to gain even MORE power!
More data surveillance and less privacy? Spy chief says the public must decide
The public must decide if spies should conduct greater data surveillance to identify the next terrorist, Security Intelligence Service director-general Rebecca Kitteridge says.
Six months on from the Royal Commission of Inquiry in the Christchurch mosque terror attacks, Kitteridge wants to have a public campaign, akin to that of the Covid-19 pandemic, to talk about the possible “technology-privacy trade off” and unite New Zealanders behind national security threats.
…I spy with my 5 eyes, something beginning with 1984!
We have the capacity to catch terrorists by using the existing powers focused differently, not by importing Orwell’s Big Sister!
If any other political party asked to create a secret police force that hunts for word crimes and thought criminals there would be rioting in the street but because it’s the Maori Party and it’s aimed at something we all hate that’s somehow fine?
The duplicitous and underhand manner in which the NZ Police have quietly amassed a mass surveillance network alongside their constant abuse of power to get what they want is an incredibly dangerous combination for any State Agency to gain.
Are we sure we know what level of power we are blithely handing over here?
A Police State starts with the promise of security.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media
The police know that they are not meant to be using drink/drive checkpoints to collect data for other operations or purposes.
This is exactly what they did in Lower Hutt one Sunday afternoon, to dear old citizens attending an End of Life Choice meeting in a private home. Threat to security ? Not at all. I think the officer in charge of that operation was a Catholic, and therefore possibly more likely to be opposed to euthanasia, and some cops may have expressed unease about performing under false pretences, but there has to be another back story when tax payer funding was being diverted to an issue which posed no threat to the general public, and when it was an area of public debate at the time.
Like the busting of dear little old ladies hoping to sign off with dignity, the misuse of drink/drive checkpoints is unlikely to be police policy, but probably handy for cops wanting to improve their stats, and needing to impress their superiors whose knees tremble at a query from the Minister, so I’d start with the National Office and HQ officers – change the way they think – recycle them elsewhere or somewhere – but Kitteridge shouldn’t be asking the public to do her job for her when the outcome is fairly predictable.
That’s how they knew Lundy was guilty – they caught him in a speed camera, but speed cameras cannot be used as evidence in a trial for anything other than a speeding offence.
That would have been admissable, that would have clinched it at the first trial forever, game over. No way they’d walk from that. In that case you’re going to have to explain why they repudiated their own evidence from the first trial at the second trial and had Lundy going in the middle of the night instead of the evening rush hour when they were sitting on a photo of him from the evening. No matter how low one’s view of the police, there’s no world where they would make a case for a different time than speed camera evidence they had.
Andrew- Interesting about Lundy. Perhaps the regulation/law restricting speed camera evidence to speeding offences needs to be revisited if it means that major criminals might otherwise escape conviction and punishment for crimes they’ve committed.
Nothing to hide and nothing to fear. That’s part of the rationale some Remuera-ites probably had when they wanted the police to do over the houses of Mongel Mob members while they were at a funeral last week.
That’s why they were happy about South Auckland houses being done over at dawn for overstayers.
For the purposes of having a good clean, bad behaviour free society those same people will welcome dawn raids, house to house in the streets of Remuera, St Heliers, Fendalton and Khandallah on a “just-in-case” basis. Nothing to hide, nothing to fear.
It is the Millennial understanding of life as normal…having grown up revealing every private detail to all and sundry, forever on social media. It has set a new non-privacy social paradigm. Scary.
The cops photograph and video gang/bike activities and afterwards review the evidence and arrest them. They did that for the BOP and Hawkes Bay incidents a month or two back.
I didnt see any cyclists get arrested for resisting the cops and refusing to stop when they trespassed over the Harbour Bridge. They may have reviewed their videos later.
I wouldnt expect the cops to carry out large scale arrests at a gathering and cause a risk to them and public. Next we’ll see the Natz/Act bring in the army/SAS/helicopters/Tanks to quell a riot.
Comments are closed.