
SAFE are deeply frustrated with MPI forย onlyย issuing a warning to a Timaru pig farm after anย investigation was prompted by shocking footage of illegal animal cruelty captured byย Farmwatch.
MPI animal welfare inspectors visited the Timaru pig farm in July this year afterย footage releasedย byย Farmwatchย showed pigs kept in sow stalls, which have been illegal since 2015. A recent statement made by MPI announced that the farm wasย onlyย issued with a warning.
SAFEโs Head of Campaigns, Marianne Macdonald, says this is further evidence that MPI is incapable of holding the pig industry to account when they break the lawย which is why weย are asking the Government to protect animal welfare with anย independentย crownย entity withย adequateย regulatory and enforcement powers.
โThe currentย monitoring andย enforcementย modelย isย
The same farm wasย shown to be using farrowing cratesย much too small for theย sowsย confined within them.
โAt the vulnerable timeย these mother pigsย wereย trying to nurture their babies, they were in crates so smallย that metalย barsย dug into their sides. Many were unable to lie down without having their faces wedged under their feeding troughs, as the crates were shorter than their bodies. This is an appalling way to treatย any animal, especially one who has just given birth.โ
Last weekย SAFEย gave anย oral submission to the Primary Production Select Committee, where they pressed theย Government to ban the use of farrowing crates.
โThisย weekย weโveย seen Countdownย supermarketsย


The link below is from the MPI website. It is most disappointing that it issued only a warning to the Timaru pig farmer but it will probably say that the new regulations which, according to the link came into force in October 2018, do not cover the Timaru pig farmer whose atrocious conduct was detected in July.
When you think about it, what will a warning achieve? Nothing. The animal abuser who obviously endorses cruelty to animals but who calls himself a pig “farmer” will treat it with contempt – like he does his animals.
Surely MPI could have taken more appropriate action against him even without the new regulations. But when you read the article it becomes obvious that they conduct a sort of triage type exercise and, in their own words, prosecute only the worst cases. Who decides what constitutes “the worst case”? Isn’t keeping pigs in the way this farmer did a “worst case” scenario?
So yes, it does look like MPI are incapable of holding the pig industry to account. They probably have skin in the game.
https://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/media-releases/one-month-until-new-animal-welfare-regulations/
Yes we need to take MPI apart and rebuild it again and throw the National cling-ons out.
Timaru is Cantebury, not Otago! Not that it makes a difference to animal cruelty, it just shows how Oblivious Aucklanders are regarding Provincial boundary’s north or south of the Auckland side of the Bombay hills.
Comments are closed.