Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. My dear friend,
    Well over 51 % of the popular vote were against Trump but still … he was elected. Now, the question is how to fight fashistoide trends, how to safeguard or better improve democracy and its institutions which have not held up well in the last years. Not only an American phenomenon, among present day democracies (Turkey, Israel, Hungary, Poland, the French right, etc.) not speaking about China and esp. Russia or the many other small dictatorships, etc. Now fight this with a boycott, which inevitably hurts all parts of these countries and increases antagonisms between countries will lead – and quickly – to trade wars and real wars. On a personal level boycott where do you draw the line?
    I am afraid we need to find other ways.

    1. I am listening to John Pilger (http://johnpilger.com/), to some extent. The issue, unfortunately, is that it is not just Trump and his supporters who are the problem for the planet; nor just that the next US administration is looking more and more like a mid 1930s German nightmare. It is the fundamental collapse of economic, commercial and social ethics in the world’s largest economy that threatens the health of the planet. The fact is that America has for many years been behaving and continues to behave in the manner of the lead dog in a pack of huskies and taking us all to places I personally would like to avoid. I’m just saying people need to be either consciously in or out. How they express that is their business, but cruising along pretending the sun shines out of theirs is not an option for me.

    2. Yes Christian,

      I imagine many people will attempt to find other ways, but I had not intended to give the impression that Trump and his constituency are the only factors that revolt me about America today. John Pilger (http://johnpilger.com/) has been doing some very interesting investigative reporting that I trust.

      The American political, economic, commercial and social system are broken and not even the millions of very good people in America have been able to turn things around. I am under no illusion that my personal choice to Avoid American is a form of isolationism, but the argument that this will acerbate the situation is flawed.

      New Zealand has stood up to American nuclear militarism in the past. I have tried to make the case for people to have the courage to make the personal sacrifices required to let go of America as far as they can. It would seem to be a healthy thing to do.

  2. John,

    Firstly, thank you for your blogpost and taking the time to share your thoughts with us. As someone who has written a few myself, I know the time and dedication it requires.

    “Avoiding America” sounds fine in principle. Hell, I’ll probably do it as much as possible, especially at the supermarket where Country of Origin can be ascertained. (Who knew that the iconic ‘Oreo Cookies’ for sale at our supermarkets were made – not from our American cuzzies – but in China?! I kid you not. It’s there in tiny lettering, beneath where the ‘Ingredients’ are listed.)

    However, the reach of the American Empire is more than just the services (Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc); entertainment, or products it offers to the rest of the global population.

    The most far-reaching aspect of US cultural colonialism is with it’s ideas.

    Neo-liberalist ideas emanated from the Chicago School of Economics. They were picked up by Thatcher and Reagan. And by Roger Douglas and our local, home-grown “Business Roundtable” (now known as the so-called “NZ Initiative”).

    The ideas were largely “free”; promulgated globally, and picked up by misguided individuals who then applied it to their own nations.

    Herein New Zealand, we know how that went, from 1984 onward.

    Part of the enabling of neo-liberalism lay with the collapse of the former-Soviet Union.

    If we take the Cold War, in part, as a “contest of economic ideas”, then centralised economic planning failed, and western free enterprise capitalism won. The latter offered ‘goodies’ which the former often could not. (And Soviet repression of dissidents also added a nail to the coffin of their system.)

    Sure, it could be argued that Soviet-style socialism wasn’t real socialism. (Which I agree, it wasn’t.)

    But in the public’s mind, they identified the Soviet system with socialism; their system collapsed; and capitalism won the “race” for credibility.

    Neo-liberalism piggy-backed onto capitalism’s victory, and this was proven by Labour (1980s) and National rolling back many of our own socialist successes (asset sales, free prescriptions, greater reliance of private providers, etc).

    Neo-liberalism succeeded because there was no counter-weight to it with ideas. Socialism had been discredited by the failure of the Soviet system. So capitalism had been “proven to be correct”.

    The same can be applied to Trumpism.

    We can boycott US goods and services (not entirely possible), but it’s the ideas that remain influential and most pernicious.

    And one thing that the Left understands with crystal clarity is that ideas are more powerful than any physical weapon.

    How do we counter the ideas of Trumpism?

    The irony here is at it’s richest; Trump advocates economic nationalism and (perhaps) a form of isolationism. But Trumpism will cross borders like water through our fingers.

    Ideas do not respect national borders.

    1. Firstly, thank you Frank for taking the time to add some valuable historic context. Your observations lead me to many more questions. Thank you.

      I follow Noam Chomsky whose latest interview on Aljazeera is a cracker (http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2016/11/upfront-special-noam-chomsky-trump-era-161125114959227.html).

      One of the points Chomsky makes is that there is a significant difference between Adolf Hitler and Trump. Adolf was an ideologue. Trump is an ignorant, thin-skinned megalomaniac; vacuous; he has no known political positions, he’s basically a showman.

      I’m not sure there is such a thing as “Trumpism”, certainly not yet. His behaviour is too inconsistent. The fundamental danger the planet now faces, is the unpredictability of a narcissist who is likely to continue making decisions based on his ego-centric view of the world. He could throw a tantrum at any point in time and allow the random “ideas” that are carried by the people around him to vent.

      As John Minto pointed out yesterday, “We can analyse their {National’s} policies to death but unless we are prepared to act against them then we are complicit with them.” That same principle applies with American policies. Longe got at least that one right.

      At this point in time there seems little public appetite to act politically at all. We are all too busy consuming or keeping our noses out of the poverty trough. Our hope in the longer term, as Chomsky points out in the interview, is that a majority of young people who voted, voted against Trump. We need the majority of young people who vote in New Zealand, to vote – first against National as the greater of the two mainstream evils. I don’t have much faith in the current Labour or Green leadership, so perhaps the best we can do is to deliberately invite experienced activists out of the woodwork to help inject new voters with the type of political passion that my generation was fortunate enough to experience in the 60s and 70s. We fought ideas effectively then and we need to pass on what we learned in a more deliberate manner.

Comments are closed.