Tommy Robinson’s enormous 110 000+ protest in the UK last week are not about the Anglo Saxon values we whakapapa to in the West, they are white supremacy fears using mass immigration as the fuel…
Westminster’s hardening attitudes to immigration are leading anti-racist campaigners to warn a far-right UK government no longer seems unthinkable
…in his powerful 2013 polemic, ‘How we invented freedom & why it matters’, Conservative Politician and writer, Daniel Hannan makes a powerful case for the values of the Anglosphere by tracing the history of Anglo-Saxon democratic friction points from Crown vs Parliament, Protestant vs Catholic and Whig vs Tory.
Hannan argues that these friction points towards a common law where the individual was empowered against the Crown set in motion a raft of unique Anglo-Saxon political values that created an exceptionalism for Western Democracy.
Free Speech, free contract, free assembly, parliamentary control of the executive, an independent Judiciary, these Hannon argues sets in motion a collection of values that builds a democratic infrastructure that has been honed by Whig and Tory factions over centuries and diluted a system of Western Civilisation that empowers the individual and protects them from tyrants.
These Anglo-Saxon values of Free Speech, Freedom of Religion, no taxation without representation, the freedom of the individual, Independent Judiciary, free contract, free assembly – these are values that EVERY human wants, regardless of skin colour or culture.
Robinson is simply using fear to attack others coming into our countries and enjoying the universal freedoms that Anglo-Saxon tradition has built over 1000 years.
The Rule of Law, and not the whims of a brutal leader are something everyone wants.
The cultural friction of mass immigration has been allowed because cheap immigration is a lazy way to expand GDP by politicians who don’t give a fuck.
Take NZ.
National, ACT and NZF have over the last year let in 140,500 new mostly-young workers, predominantly from India, China, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Fiji and South Africa, while 201 Kiwis flee the country EVERY SINGLE DAY!
Both Labour and National over the last 3 decades have used mass immigration as a lazy GDP bump rather than invest in us as a people to expand our own population base.
Like everything, all Parties have allowed the free market to work it out rather than protect our own people AND migrant workers from being exploited!
Auckland has ground to a fucking gridlocked stand still because it’s size has grown by 17% without any of the extra revenue to pay for that growth!
At some point we are going to have to have a serious conversation about mass immigration and how it is killing this country!
You can’t bring that huge number of people into NZ each and every single year without there being intense cultural, political and social friction.
Here are 5 ideas.
1 – Halt all immigration coming in for 3 years so the infrastructure can catch up while offering amnesty for all current overstayers.
2 – We have to incentivise Kiwis into lifting their fertility rates and heavily subsidise childcare and maternity leave – we need us having more kids to keep up with the population requirements so we don’t need to keep importing so many people.
3 – Lift our refugee numbers with wrap around services – we have an obligation as a Liberal Progressive Democracy to provide haven for those being damaged on a warring planet.
4 – Ensure every single migrant worker coming into NZ are automatically enrolled in a migrant Union to ensure they are being paid the same as domestic workers so bosses can’t use
5 – Bonded education – pay the fees and provide a living allowance plus cheap accomodation to all domestic Kiwis training to be teachers, drs, nurses, and all other public service roles and jobs – they get the education for free in return for 5 years bonded service in NZ.
These 5 ideas allow us to show kindness, prudence and build our own population up while standing by our democratic values.
Allowing the free market to simply push out anyone with skills to bring in cheaper work forces for exploitation IS NOT AN IMMIGRATION POLICY!
As the planet burns, these trends are are only going to become more extreme, we will start seeing vast numbers of climate refugees fleeing parts of the planet that become increasingly inhospitable, so we need a plan to cope with that while holding onto the Anglo-Saxon values that make our Democracy so attractive in the first place.
Those Anglo-Saxon values don’t have a skin colour, they are universal, we welcome our migrant brothers and sisters because the values we stand for recognise the importance of the individual, but we also need to recognise the pressures generated by mass immigration when we are economically played off against each other.
Protecting our migrant communities from exploitation strengthens us all and a multi-cultural society is a strength, not a weakness.
Our Anglo-Saxon values of Free Speech, free contract, free assembly, parliamentary control of the executive, an independent Judiciary, no taxation without representation and the liberty of the individual are not a skin colour, Tommy Robinson, is trying to pretend that it is.
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.
Worth noting that ‘Tommy Robinson’- which isn’t even his real name, he was born Stephen Yaxley- isn’t opposed to mass immigration, regardless of how similar the immigrants are culturally to the British people. With one little exception- he only likes immigrants who support the genocidal zionist entity.
‘Tommy’ has never been an organic leader of any sort. From the start, he has been a creature of the zionist ‘counterjihad’ movement, funded by zionists infiltrators in Britain, they even made up his new name for him in one of their focus groups. Very similar to someone like a Brenton Tarrant in that regard.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/tommy-robinson-zionist-agenda-hidden-forces-behind-uk-race-riots/288108/
At least Tommo was able to reveal that the smiling Welsh Christian choirboy (ha) who murdered 3 young Southport girls was an active attendee at mosque in HMP Belmarsh.
Good, his Christian upbringing had obviously brought him to embrace some nasty anti-white beliefs in the godless failed s**thole that is Britain. Now he’s getting his head right with the world. Now he can learn about who’s behind the sort of anti-white hatred that people like you spout.
Certainly not Mo. He found the violent sunnah of your namesake much more appealing than the Christian love, forgiveness and peacenik stuff. Bit of a stain on 2 tier’s legacy as well; fronting for the violent father to be given asylum. Not that the vile commenters glorifying the death of Charlie Kirk care one iota about Bebe, Elsie and Alice
Ann E that kid was clearly a sick individual. The entire Israeli administration is littered with sick individuals but you celebrate that. They sure as hell don’t like Christians either.
Ask a Palestinian Christian why their numbers in Gaza, Ramallah and Bethlehem have been seriously depleted in recent decades and if they’re truthful you would get the same answer a Lebanese Christian would give to explain why that once Christian country is now majority Muslim. You can try and blame Jews for mistreating Christians in Israel if you want to but you sure as hell can’t blame them for driving Christians out of Muslim-held towns and regions.
mintpressnews
There’s a reliable source. Perhaps you can tell us who funded them.
Well, at least it isn’t funded by Israel or Murdoch.
Members of the general public, like myself, rather than international finance 🙂
Bullshit. Talk about where the start up money came from.
Why do you hate any media not run by pedophiles? Very disturbing.
Talk about where the start up money came from.
Not the paid Zionazi press that for sure
1-5 was more-or-less tried during CovidCult. It failed as did the Smug Hermit Nation
1. That would boost wages and cut unemployment.
2. Bring back the child benefit. There would be a que of trending Trad Mums. Hey if Russia can afford NZ$14,000 for the first child and $18000 for the second in the middle of a war surely NZ can.
3. Agree
4. Deport auckland townhouse builders that force labour to work 10-12 hour days 7 day weeks. Deport liquor store barons that refuse to employ kiwis and only employ immigrants, indebted to the baron for an immigration fee.
5. This scheme worked well in the past to train doctors nurses and teachers. There were also cadet schemes – accomodation plus on the job training in all sorts of industries. Any scheme to get young people into the workforce without enslaving debt is awesome.
“ We have to incentivise Kiwis into lifting their fertility rates. . . “
From New Zealand to Nigeria to Norway, from Japan to Jamaica to Jordan, given the chance and the choice, women have fewer or no children.
You need a different point 3.
What you call a choice is seriously flawed, the current choice is to have children, stay in poverty, struggling to pay for rentals or deep in debt if you can get a deposit for a house then having the children drowning in debt if they seek any higher education. Up to the 1960s a father could provide for a family, food and a house with enough of a section to grow a decent garden as well while the mother raised the children teaching them decent community values as well. While I am talking about 2 parent families there will always be single parent families unless we embrace sweeping moral reforms which is very unlikely so there needs to be a realistic way for them to survive as well. Actually I would want them to do a bit better than just survive.
Pretty straightforward if you have a government focused on building a good economy. You simply need to have a functioning economy (i.e. one not controlled by international finance) and decent wages.
A system of formal recognition for those who raise a truly impressive family wouldn’t hurt- I know at least 1 (Catholic) wife who would be eligible for the Mother Heroine award had she lived in the USSR, although we might need to set the criteria a little lower here.
I noticed Tommy was happy to import GROUP of Maori and have Musk ,an immigrant raving at his march how fucked is that .
Not to mention the notorious wife-beater Avi Yemini- although some British nationalists who had infiltrated Yaxley-Lennon’s little zionist riot did shout him down when he was trying to speak.
Hey, look it Stephen Yaxley Lennon aka Tommy Robinson the little zionazi paid psyop figure! And guess who was buying Kebabs, Chinese food, Indian food etc. when they got hungry during the protest? These fucken Britis are all contradiction’s hypocritical and Destiny Church Brian Tamaki crew were pathetic why were they even there in the first place??
The “far right” is making rapid progress in the US, UK, Germany and to a lesser extent in New Zealand.
What do these nations have in common? An “Anglo-Saxon heritage”, high rates of immigration, faltering economies and increasing social inequality. A potent mix. But these are not disconnected phenomena. They all relate to the way in which global capitalism has evolved in the late twentieth and early twenty first century.
Moving into the second half of the twentieth all four were successful high productivity, high wage economies. Because of their dominance of global production and their geo-political power exercised through their respective empires the Anglosphere powers came to dominate the global financial system which was then used to fund the development of industry and infrastructure in cheap labour countries. The US and UK reaped the financial benefits of their dominance of global finance, but their manufacturing industries paid a price. They could no longer compete with the combination of high productivity and cheap labour in countries like China and Vietnam.
The chosen solution for domestic manufacturing in the US and UK was cheaper labour through mass immigration. Immigration has the other advantage that it not only lowers the immediate cost of labour, it also lowers the cost of reproducing labour, with beneficial impacts for the state, the working class and society generally. When immigration replaces natural reproduction the costs of child rearing (fifteen or more unproductive years of feeding, housing and educating) are removed. But the advantage gained is only temporary and fifteen expensive unproductive years at the start of life are replaced by fifteen expensive unproductive years at life’s end. Further, to be fully effective immigrant labour would have had to completely destroy the conditions of the domestic working class. Instead immigration proved to be only a half measure. The working class share of the domestic product fell, but at the same time de-industrialization continued relentlessly. Immigration therefore only prolonged the agony for manufacturing capital and the working class.
This slow motion disaster provoked a slow motion reaction based on the working class idea of its “Anglo-Saxon heritage” which was equated with their perceived right to live in a similar manner to their betters.
While domestic manufacturing was in the doldrums financial capital, being global in its reach, was doing pretty well. So an elite upper class and its entourage in the upper middle class prospered while the working class sank into poverty.
Germany has gone through a similar process, though lagging some decades behind the US and UK, and has suffered a double hit through the escalating price of energy as a result of the war with Russia.
New Zealand as part of the Anglosphere has followed the track of the US and UK. It has suffered mass immigration along with the deindustrialization that mass immigration could only delay, not avert. The conditions of the working class have naturally declined as a result.
New Zealand also suffers an energy crisis due to bad policy decisions on a par with Germany’s and has the added disadvantage that it lacks finance capital on anything like the per capita scale of the US, UK and Germany. All that is saving New Zealand as a whole is the continuing strength of its primary industry. If that falters, New Zealand will be in a bigger pickle than the US, UK or Germany and the “far right” can be expected to make proportionate political gains.
Mass immigration as a policy was insufficient to address the problems caused by the concentration of industrial production in a global economy, and bringing an end to mass immigration will also be no answer to the problems caused by deindustrialization in the Anglosphere.
Can the left steal the right’s lunch as suggested above? Well, yes it could, but it would not solve our conundrum. It would just put a different bunch of politicians in charge of managing the catastrophe.
Last grasp of the angry whiteman to hold onto power they feel entitled to since they made God an old whiteguy who doesnt keep the sabbath.
You speak loudly for someone living in someone else’s country.
WTF u talkin bout Willis ? I’m from these parts!
As a migrant of almost forty years, a Lazy way to pump up GDP is the absolute truth about our immigration policy,but we can also add that it is what our politicians donors required of the governments they ‘brought shares in’. The problems of ‘unregulated’ immigration brings does not affect them and those that facilitated those policies. In fact it helps them for they will always require a dispensable mass of bodies to serve them.
“You can’t bring that huge number of people into NZ each and every single year without there being intense cultural, political and social friction.”
This is exactly the point. Robinson is a tool and immigration is a tool. Playing the immigration card is the gift that keeps on giving for the political class and their billionaire masters. It can be used to draw attention away from other, typically poor, political decisions (that primarily serve the 1% at the expense of the 99%). It can also be used to usher in greater controls over us all, whatever they may be, under the guise of protection us from bad immigrants. Playing the public safety card is another gift that keeps on giving for our political lackeys to the moneyed class. And it can be used just to keep the division between the people, frothing along nicely.
Immigration, like most other political choices of recent times, is pure and utter b/s.
” We have to incentivise Kiwis into lifting their fertility rates ”
Groan.
Increasing population is the last thing the planet needs.
The problem is not a lack of people in he nation or on the planet, the problem is the (capitalist) system that is based upon a fallacy of infinite resources and encourages infinite growth.
Address the system first instead of increasing the stress upon it by encouraging population growth.
Steady state systems persist longest.
The birth rate in New Zealand is well below replacement, let alone a steady state- and that’s without even taking emigration to Aus and elsewhere into account.
Mohammed, picture this. No oil, no tractors on farms…no trucks distributing food. No fertilizer on fields, current system collapses. Less mouths to feed may be a blessing.
As a Brit by ancestry, reason is our first thing.